Plant and Soil

, Volume 248, Issue 1–2, pp 297–303 | Cite as

Chickpea facilitates phosphorus uptake by intercropped wheat from an organic phosphorus source

  • Long LiEmail author
  • Caixian Tang
  • Zdenko Rengel
  • Fusuo Zhang


Pot experiments were conducted to investigate interspecific complementation in utilization of phytate and FePO4 by plants in the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) intercropping under sterile and non-sterile conditions. The pots were separated into two compartments by either a solid root barrier to eliminate root contact and solute movement, by a nylon mesh (30 μM) to prevent root contact but permit solute exchange, or not separated between the compartments. Wheat plants were grown in one compartment and chickpea in the other. Two P sources were tested at 60 mg P kg−1 soil (sodium phytate or FePO4). Under non-sterile conditions, the biomass of wheat was significantly greater when the roots were intermingled with chickpea than when the roots were separated from chickpea roots by a solid root barrier or nylon mesh. When phytate–P was applied, P concentrations in wheat (2.9 g kg−1 in shoots and 1.4 g kg−1 in roots) without root barrier between the two species were higher than those in the treatments with nylon mesh or with the solid root barrier separation (1.9 g kg−1 in shoots and 1.0 g kg−1 in roots). In contrast, P concentrations in wheat supplied with FePO4 were similar between the root separation treatments. There was no significant difference in P uptake by chickpea between the P sources or between the root separation treatments, except that P uptake was greater in the phytate treatment with the root barrier. Total P uptake from phytate was increased by 25% without root separation compared to the root separation treatments. Under sterile conditions and supply of phytate–P, the biomass of wheat was doubled when the roots were intermingled with chickpea and increased by a third with the nylon mesh separation compared to that with the solid root barrier. Biomass production in wheat at various treatments correlated with P concentration in shoot. Biomass production and P concentration in chickpea were unaffected by root separation. Total P uptake by plants was 68% greater with root intermingling and 37% greater with nylon mesh separation than that with the solid root barrier. The results suggest that chickpea roots facilitate P utilization from the organic P by wheat.

inorganic phosphorus interspecific interaction phosphorus uptake phytate–P root box wheat/chickpea intercropping 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K, Yoshihara T and Johansen C 1990 Phosphorus uptake by pigeon pea and its role in cropping systems of the Indian subcontinent. Science 248, 477-480.Google Scholar
  2. Callaway R M and Pugnaire F I 1999 Facilitation in plant community. In Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology. Ed. F I Pugnaire. pp. 623-648. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Casper B B and Jackson R B 1997 Plant competition underground. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 545-570.Google Scholar
  4. Dalal R C 1977 Soil organic phosphorus. Adv. Agron. 29, 83-117.Google Scholar
  5. Francis C A 1986 Multiple Cropping Systems. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Gardner W K and Boundy K A 1983 The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L. IV. The effect of interplanting wheat and white lupin on the growth and mineral composition of the two species. Plant Soil 70, 391-402.Google Scholar
  7. Grierson P F and Adams M A 2000 Plant species affect acid phosphatase, ergosterol and microbial P in a jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Sm.) forest in south-western Australia.Soil Bio. Biochem. 32, 1817-1827.Google Scholar
  8. Gupta A K, Kaur V and Kaur N 1998 Appearance of different phosphatase forms and phosphorus partitioning in nodules of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) during development. Acta Physiol. Plant. 20, 369-374.Google Scholar
  9. Horst W J and Waschkies C 1987 Phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in mixed culture with white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenkd. 150, 1-8Google Scholar
  10. Li L, Zhang F S, Li X L, Christie P, Sun J H, Yang S C and Tang C 2002 Interspecific facilitation of nutrient uptake by intercropped maize and faba bean. Nut. Cycl. Agroecosys. (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Li M G, Osaki M, Rao I M and Tadano T 1997 Secretion of phytase from the roots of several plant species under phosphorus-deficient conditions. Plant Soil 195, 161-169.Google Scholar
  12. Rao I M, Borrero V, Ricaurte J and Garcia R 1999 Adaptive attributes of tropical forage species to acid soils. V. Differences in phosphorus acquisition from less available inorganic and organic sources of phosphate. J. Plant Nutr. 22, 1175-1196.Google Scholar
  13. Richardson A E, Hadobas P A and Hayes J E 2000 Acid phosphomonoesterase and phytase activities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots and utilization of organic phosphorus substrates by seedlings grown in sterile culture. Plant Cell Environ. 23, 397-405.Google Scholar
  14. SAS Institute 1985 SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  15. Tang C, McLay C D A and Barton L 1997 A comparison of proton excretion of twelve pasture legumes grown in nutrient solution. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 37, 563-570.Google Scholar
  16. Tang C, Unkovich M J and Bowden J W 1999 Factors affecting soil acidification under legumes. III. Effects of nitrate supply. New Phytol. 143, 513-521.Google Scholar
  17. Van Der Meer J H 1989 The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Yan F, Schubert S and Mengel K 1996 Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic anions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 617-624.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Long Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Caixian Tang
    • 2
  • Zdenko Rengel
    • 2
  • Fusuo Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant NutritionChina Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil InteractionsMOE BeijingP.R. China
  2. 2.Soil Science and Plant NutritionThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations