Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 225–231 | Cite as

1994–1996 U.S. Singleton Birth Weight Percentiles for Gestational Age by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Gender

  • Greg R. AlexanderEmail author
  • Michael D. Kogan
  • John H. Himes


Objectives: Establishing and comparing race, ethnic, and gender-specific birth weight percentiles for gestational age is requisite for investigating the determinants of variations in fetal growth. In this study, we calculate percentiles of birth weight for gestational age for the total 1994–1996 U.S. population and contrast these percentiles by racial/ethnic and gender groups. Methods: Single live births to U.S. resident mothers were selected from the 1994–1996 U.S. Natality Files. After exclusions, 5,973,440 non-Hispanic Whites, 1,393,908 non-Hispanic African Americans, 1,683,333 Hispanics, 80,187 Native Americans, and 510,021 other racial/ethnic groups were used to calculate distribution percentiles of birth weight for each gestational age for which there were at least 50 cases to calculate the 50th percentile and 100 cases to calculate the 10th percentile. Results: Fetal growth patterns among the four U.S. racial/ethnic groups varied markedly and, across the gestational age range, there was considerable oscillation in the relative ranking of any one group's birth weight percentile value in comparison to the others. Males had relatively higher birth weight percentile values than females. The proportion of infants with a birth weight value less than 1994–1996 U.S. population's 10th percentile value of birth weight for their corresponding gestational age was 7.87 for non-Hispanic Whites, 15.43 for non-Hispanic African Americans, 9.30 for Hispanics, and 8.81 for Native Americans. Conclusions: While the factors underlying trends and population subgroup differences in fetal growth are unclear, nutrition, smoking habits, health status, and maternal morbidity are possible precursors for part of the variations in patterns of fetal growth. As prenatal care has been touted as a means to reduce the risk of fetal growth restriction at term, assuring the availability and accessibility of comprehensive prenatal care services is viewed as an essential corollary in the effort to improve fetal growth patterns in the United States.

Birth weight gestational age fetal growth restriction small-for-gestational age large-for-gestational age gender, race ethnicity, Hispanic 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 1963;32:793–800.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brenner WE, Edelman DA, Hendricks CH. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126:555–64.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wen SW, Goldenberg RL, Cutter GR, Hoffman HJ, Cliver SP. Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery: prenatal risk factors in an indigent population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:213–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kramer MS. Intrauterine growth and gestational duration determinants. Pediatrics 1987;80:502–11.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:163–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang J, Bowes WA. Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:200–208.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams RL. Intrauterine growth curves: intra-and international comparisons with different ethnic groups in California. Prevent Med 1975;4:163–72.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Overpeck MD, Hediger ML, Zhang J, Trumble AC, Klebanoff MA. Birth weight for gestational age of Mexican American infants born in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93(6):943–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH, Mor J, Goldenberg R. Racial differences in birth weight for gestational age and infant mortality in extremely-low-risk U.S. populations. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1999;13:205–17.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Martin J, Papiernik E. What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins and triplets in the United States? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998;41(1):115–25.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kieffer EC, Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH, Herman WM, Mor JM, Hayashi R. Influence of diabetes during pregnancy on gestational age-specific newborn weight among U.S. Black and U.S. White infants. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147(11):1053–61.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexander GR. Using vital record data to explore perinatal health issues of Asian-Americans. In Proceedings of the 1997 Joint Meeting of the Public Health Conference of Records and Statistics and the Data User's Conference, Washington, D.C., July 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Center for Health Statistics, Taffel S, Johnson D, Heuser R. A method for imputing length of gestation on birth certificates. Vital Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 93. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82-1367. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kogan MD, Martin J, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Ventura S, Frigoletto F. The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the U.S., 1981–1995: a comparison of prenatal care indices. JAMA 1998;279(20):1623–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alexander GR, Korenbrot CC. The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight. Future of Children 1995;5(1):103–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg R. Alexander
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael D. Kogan
    • 2
  • John H. Himes
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Public Health, Department of Maternal and Child HealthUniversity of Alabama atBirmingham
  2. 2.Office of Data and Information ManagementMaternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesRockville
  3. 3.School of Public Health, Division of EpidemiologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations