Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 891–904 | Cite as

Identification and Distribution of Oviposition Stimulants for Monarch Butterflies in Hosts and Nonhosts

  • Meena Haribal
  • J. A. A. Renwick
Article

Abstract

Flavonol glycosides that act as oviposition stimulants for monarch butterflies were surveyed from a range of asclepiad hosts and some nonhosts. Major stimulants also were identified as quercetin-3-O-(2″-O-β-xylosyl)-β-D-galactoside and quercetin-3-O-β-D-galactoside from Asclepias syriaca and A. incarnata, respectively. The flavonol glycosides in A. curassavica, A. tuberosa, A. incarnata, A. syriaca, A. humistrata, A. albicans, A. eriocarpa, Calotropis procera, Cynanchum acutum, Vincetoxicum (Cynanchum) nigrum and in nonhosts Hoya australis and Nerium oleander were compared and characterized by HPLC and spectral studies. There was great variation in quercetin glycoside content. On the basis of the sugar moieties attached to quercetin, the asclepiad glycosides were classified broadly as those containing: (1) galactose, glucose, and rhamnose; (2) galactose, glucose, and xylose; and (3) galactose, glucose, xylose, and rhamnose. In most cases, galactose was attached to the 3-O-position (1″) of quercetin and other sugars were attached either to the 2″ or 6″ position of galactose. The sugars of triglycosides were attached at both 2″ and 6″ positions. A geographical pattern of flavonol distribution that may have affected the evolution of host recognition by the butterflies is suggested.

Danaus plexippus monarch butterflies Nymphalidae Asclepiadaceae Apocynaceae oviposition stimulants flavonol glycosides Asclepias Calotropis Nerium Cynanchum Hoya 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ackery, P. R., and Vane-Wright, R. I. 1984. Milkweed Butterflies. British Museum, London, pp. 201–205.Google Scholar
  2. Baur, R., Haribal, M., Renwick, J. A. A., and StÄdler, E. 1997. Contact chemoreception related to oviposition behavior in the Monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus. Physiol. Entomol. In press.Google Scholar
  3. Brower, L. P. 1995. Understanding and misunderstanding the migration of the monarch butterfly (Nymphalidae) in North America: 1857–1995. J. Lepid. Soc. 49:304–385.Google Scholar
  4. Good, R. 1952. An atlas of the asclepiadaceae. The New Phytologist. 51:198–209.Google Scholar
  5. Harborne, J. B. 1973. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, 216 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Haribal, M., and Renwick, J. A. A. 1996. Oviposition stimulants for the monarch butterfly: Flavonol glycosides from Asclepias curassavica. Phytochemistry 41:139–144.Google Scholar
  7. Larsen, L. M., Nielsen, J. K., and SØrensen, H. (1982). Identification of 3-O-[2-O-(β-D-xylopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranosyl] flavoids in horse radish leaves acting as feeding stimulants for flea beetle, Phytochemistry 21:1029–1033.Google Scholar
  8. Liede, S., and Albers, F. 1994. Tribal disposition of genera in the Asclepiadaceae. Taxon 43:201–231.Google Scholar
  9. Mossa, J. S., Tariq, M., Moshin, A., Ageel, A. M., Al-Yahya, M. A., Al-Said, M. S., and Rafatullah, S. 1991. Pharmacological studies on aerial parts of Calotropis procera. Am. J. Chin. Med. 19:223–231.Google Scholar
  10. Nishida, R. 1995. Oviposition stimulants of swallowtail butterflies, pp. 17–26, in J. M. Scriber, Y. Tsubaki, and R. C. Lederhouse (eds.). Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Rahaman, M. A., and Wilcock, C. C. 1991. A report on flavonoid investigation in some Bangladesh asclepiads. Bangladesh J. Bot. 20:175–178.Google Scholar
  12. Sheeley, S. E., and Raynal, D. J. 1996. The distribution and status of species of Vincetoxicum in North America. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 123:148–156.Google Scholar
  13. Siegel, S., and Castellan, J. N. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 87.Google Scholar
  14. Webby, R. F., and Markham, K. R. 1990. Flavonol 3-O-triglycosides from Actinida species. Phytochemistry 29:289–292.Google Scholar
  15. Woodson, R. E., Jr. 1954. The North American species of Asclepias L. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 41:1–211.Google Scholar
  16. Wyatt, R., and Hunt, D. M. 1991. Hybridization in North American Asclepias. II. Flavonoid evidence. Syst. Bot. 16:132–142.Google Scholar
  17. Zalucki, M. P., Brower, L. P., and Malcolm, S. B. 1990. Oviposition by Danaus plexippus in relation to cardenolide content of three Asclepias species in southeastern U.S.A. Ecol. Entomol. 15:231–240.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meena Haribal
    • 1
  • J. A. A. Renwick
    • 1
  1. 1.Boyce Thompson InstituteIthaca

Personalised recommendations