Autonomous Robots

, Volume 14, Issue 2–3, pp 239–254 | Cite as

The Development of Hopping Capabilities for Small Robots

  • Paolo Fiorini
  • Joel Burdick
Article

Abstract

This paper describes the development of small hopping robots that are useful for many tasks in unknown, rugged terrain, and are especially suited to celestial exploration in small gravity environments. The family of hopping, or jumping, robots described here is characterized by discontinuous motion, whereby the robot stops after each jump to regain the upright position, recharge its jumping mechanism and localize itself. We describe the evolution of our hopping robot concept by way of the main prototypes that we have developed. These prototypes show that a small robot can move effectively by hopping provided that it is equipped with steering, jumping, and self-righting capabilities. The last prototype is also equipped with wheels to achieve precision motion after landing. Lessons learned during the development of these prototypes have general applicability to the design of hopping or jumping robots. In addition to reviewing some of the key aspects of the design of jumping systems, this paper gives detailed pictures and descriptions of the mechanism of the various prototypes.

hopping robots small robots nano rovers planetary rovers planetary exploration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bares, J., Hebert, M., Kanade, T., Krotkov, E., Mitchell, T., Simmons, R., and Whittaker, W. 1989. Ambler: An autonomous rover for planetary exploration. IEEE Computer, 22(6):18–26.Google Scholar
  2. Bares, J. and Wettergreen, D. 1999. Dante II: Technical description, results, and lessons learned. Int. J. of Robotics Research, 18(7):621–649.Google Scholar
  3. Berkemeier, M.D. and Fearing, R.S. 1998. Sliding and hopping gaits for the underactuated acrobot. IEEE Tran. on Robotics and Automation, 14(4):629–634.Google Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya, S. and Agrawal, S.K. 2000. Spherical rolling robot: A design and motion planning study. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 16(6):835–839.Google Scholar
  5. Bicchi, A., Balluchi, A., Prattichizzo, D., and Gorelli, A. 1997. Introducing the sphericle: An experimental testbed for research and teaching in nonholonomy. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Budenske, J.R., Dvorak, M., Gini, M., Krantz, D.G., Li, P.Y., Malver, F., Nelson, B., Papanikolopoulos, N., Rybski, P.E., Stoeter, S.A., Voyles, R., and Yesin, K.B. 2000. A miniature robotic system for reconnaissance and surveillance. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 501–507.Google Scholar
  7. De Luca, A. and Oriolo, G. 1998. Stabilization of the acrobot via iterative state steering. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics andAutomation, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 3581–3587.Google Scholar
  8. Fiorini, P., Hayati, S., Heverly, M., and Gensler, J. 1999. A hopping robot for planetary exploration. In Proc. of IEEE Aerospace Conference, Snowmass, CO.Google Scholar
  9. Hauser, J. and Murray, R.M. 1990. Nonlinear controllers for nonintegrable systems: The acrobot example. In American Control Conference, pp. 669–671.Google Scholar
  10. Kaplan, M.H. and Seifert, H. 1969. Hopping transporters for lunar exploration. J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 6(8):917–922.Google Scholar
  11. Koditschek, D.E. and Bühler, M. 1991. Analysis of a simplified hopping robot. Int. J. Robotics Reseach, 10(6):587–605.Google Scholar
  12. Li, Z. and Montgomery, R. 1990. Dynamics and optimal control of a legged roboti in flight phase. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 1816–1821.Google Scholar
  13. Lorigo, L., Paul, C., Brooks, R., McLurkin, J., and Moy, M. 1997. Autonomy for Mars exploration. In Workshop on Planetary Rovers at IROS'97, Grenoble, FR.Google Scholar
  14. M'Closkey, R.T. and Burdick, J.W. 1993. Periodic motion of a hopping robot with vertical and forward motion. Int. J. Robotics Reseach, 12(3):197–218.Google Scholar
  15. Mishkin, A., Morrison, J., Nguyen, T., Stone, H., and Cooper, B. 1998. Operations and autonomy of the mars pathfinder microrover. In IEEE Aerospace Conf. Google Scholar
  16. Oberth, J. 1959. The Moon Car. Harper and Brothers: New York.Google Scholar
  17. Raibert, M.H. 1986. Legged Robots that Balance. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Seifert, H.S. 1967. The lunar pogo stick. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 4(7):941–943.Google Scholar
  19. Shigley, J.E. and Mischke, C.R. 1989. Mechanical Engineering Design. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
  20. Spong, M.W. 1995. The swing up control problem for the acrobot. IEEE Control System Magazine, pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
  21. Volpe, R. 1999. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  22. Weiss, P. 2001. Hop..Hop...Hopbots! Science News, pp. 88–90.Google Scholar
  23. Welch, R., Wilcox, B., and Nasif, A. 1998. Nanorover for Mars. Space Technology, 17(3/4):163–172.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Fiorini
    • 1
  • Joel Burdick
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Mechanical EngineeringCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations