The Efficacy of Involuntary Outpatient Treatment in Massachusetts

  • Jeffrey Geller
  • Albert J. GrudzinskasJr.
  • Melissa McDermeit
  • William H. Fisher
  • Ted Lawlor

DOI: 10.1023/A:1022239322212

Cite this article as:
Geller, J., Grudzinskas, A.J., McDermeit, M. et al. Adm Policy Ment Health (1998) 25: 271. doi:10.1023/A:1022239322212


One means to address some of the unintended consequences of the shift of treatment for individuals with serious mental illness from hospitals to communities has been involuntary outpatient treatment (IOT). Using Massachusetts data, 19 patients with court orders for IOT were matched to all and to best fits on demographic and clinical variables, and then to individuals with the closest fit on utilization before the IOT date. Outcomes indicated the IOT group had significantly fewer admissions and hospital days after the court order. The full impact of IOT requires more study, particularly directed toward IOT's effects on insight and quality of life.

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Geller
    • 1
    • 2
  • Albert J. GrudzinskasJr.
    • 3
  • Melissa McDermeit
    • 4
  • William H. Fisher
    • 5
    • 6
  • Ted Lawlor
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
  1. 1.Public Sector PsychiatryUniversity of Massachusetts Medical CenterUSA
  2. 2.University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolUSA
  3. 3.University of Massachusetts Medical CenterUSA
  4. 4.Chestnut Health SystemsLighthouse InstituteBloomington
  5. 5.Center for Psychosocial and Forensic Services ResearchUniversity of Massachusetts Medical CenterUSA
  6. 6.University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolUSA
  7. 7.Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction ServicesUSA
  8. 8.University of Connecticut Health Center;USA
  9. 9.University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolUSA

Personalised recommendations