Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 93–104 | Cite as

Pathways to Recovery from Gambling Problems: Follow-Up from a General Population Survey

  • David C. Hodgins
  • Harold Wynne
  • Karyn Makarchuk
Article

Abstract

One goal of the present investigation was to determine the proportion of “recovered” problem and pathological gamblers in a community sample who specifically identify themselves as recovered or improved. From this group we sought to obtain a description of the precipitants of recovery and pathways to recovery. A follow-up telephone survey was conducted of participants reporting lifetime but not last year gambling problems in a recent provincial prevalence survey. Forty-two respondents were interviewed by telephone (76% response rate). A very small proportion of the group of potentially recovered problem gamblers confirmed their recovery status. In fact, the vast majority did not acknowledge a lifetime problem with gambling. Only 6 of the 42 in the target sample acknowledged ever having experienced a problem with gambling and all reported that they were not experiencing present gambling problems. The majority of this recovered group were “naturally recovered” and reported that they felt that treatment was unnecessary (5 of the 6). Reasons for recovery included financial and emotional factors and actions were dominated by stimulus control strategies and engaging in new activities. This follow-up survey provides evidence that the recovered group of gamblers is small and smaller than estimates derived from prevalence survey results.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Angus Reid Group. (1996). Problem gambling survey 1996. Vancouver: British Columbia Lottery Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Baseline Market Research Ltd. (1992). Final report: Prevalence study: Problem gambling (Prepared for Department of Finance, Province of New Brunswick). New Brunswick: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Baseline Market Research Ltd. (1996). Final report: 1996 prevalence study on problem gambling in Nova Scotia (Prepared for Nova Scotia Department of Health). Halifax, Nova Scotia: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Baseline Market Research Ltd. (1996). Final report: Prevalence study: Problem gambling: Wave 2 (Prepared for Department of Finance). Fredericton, New Brunswick: New Brunswick Department of Finance.Google Scholar
  5. Bland, R. C., Newman, S. C., Orn, H., & Stebelsky, G. (1993). Epidemiology of pathological gambling in Edmonton. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 108–112.Google Scholar
  6. Blomqvist, J. (1996). Paths to recovery from substance misuse: Change of lifestyle and role of treatment. Substance Use and Misuse, 31, 1807–1852.Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham, J. (in press). Untreated remissions from drug use: The predominant pathway. Addictive Behaviors.Google Scholar
  8. Ferris, J., & Stirpe, T. (1995). Gambling in Ontario: A report from a general population survey on gambling-related problems and opinions. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, Problem and Compulsive Gambling Project.Google Scholar
  9. Gemini Research, & Angus Reid Group. (1994). Social gaming and problem gambling in British Columbia (Report to the British Columbia Lottery Corporation). Roaring Spring, PA: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  10. Hodgins, D.C. & el-Guebaly, N. (in press). Natural and treatment-assisted recovery from gambling problems: A comparison of resolved and active gamblers. Addiction.Google Scholar
  11. Lesieur, H., & Blume, B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.Google Scholar
  12. Shaffer, H.J., Hall, M.N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis. Boston: Harvard Medical School, Division on Addictions, Harvard Project on Gambling & Health. A project funded by the National Center for Responsible Gaming.Google Scholar
  13. Shaffer, H.J., Hall, M.N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1998). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis. Unpublished raw data. Boston: Harvard Medical School, Division on Addictions, Harvard Project on Gambling & Health. A project funded by the National Center for Responsible Gaming.Google Scholar
  14. Sobell, L.C., Sobell, M.B., & Toneatto, T. (1992). Recovery from alcohol problems without treatment. In Heather, N., Miller, W.R., & Greeley, J. (Eds). Self-control and the Addictive Behaviors. New York: Maxwell MacMillan.Google Scholar
  15. Volberg, R. A. (1992). Gambling involvement and problem gambling in Montana. Albany, NY: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  16. Volberg, R. A. (1993). Gambling and problem gambling in Washington state (Report to the Washington state lottery). Albany, NY: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  17. Volberg, R. A. (1994). Gambling and problem gambling in Saskatchewan (Report to the Minister's Advisory Committee on Social Impacts of Gaming). Northampton, MA: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  18. Volberg, R. A. (1995). Gambling and problem gambling in Iowa: A replication study (Report to the Iowa Department of Human Services). Roaring Spring, PA: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  19. Volberg, R. A. (1995). Wagering and problem wagering in Louisiana (Report to the Louisiana Economic Development & Gaming Corporation). Roaring Spring, PA: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  20. Volberg, R. A. (1996). Gambling and problem gambling in New York: A 10–year replication survey, 1986 to 1996 (Report to the New York Council on Problem Gambling). Roaring Spring, PA: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  21. Volberg, R. A. (1997). Gambling and problem gambling in Mississippi: A report to the Mississippi Council on Compulsive Gambling (Social Research Report Series 97–1). Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University, Social Science Research Center.Google Scholar
  22. Volberg, R. A., & Boles, J. (1995). Gambling and problem gambling in Georgia (Report to the Georgia Department of Human Resources). Roaring Spring, PA: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  23. Volberg, R. A., & Silver, E. (1993). Gambling and problem gambling in North Dakota (Report to the North Dakota Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health). Albany, NY: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
  24. Volberg, R. A., & Stuefen, R. M. (1994). Gambling and problem gambling in South Dakota: A follow-up survey. Vermillion: Business Research Bureau, University of South Dakota.Google Scholar
  25. Volberg, R. A., Stuefen, R. M., & Madden, M. K. (1991). Gaming in South Dakota: A study of gambling participation and problem gambling and a statistical description and analysis of its socioeconomic impacts. Vermillion: Business Research Bureau, University of South Dakota.Google Scholar
  26. Wallisch, L. S. (1993). Gambling in Texas: 1992 Texas survey of adult gambling behavior. Austin, TX: Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  27. Wallisch, L. S. (1996). Gambling in Texas: 1995 surveys of adult and adolescent gambling behavior. Austin, TX: Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  28. WEFA Group. (1997). A study concerning the effects of legalized gambling on the citizens of the state of Connecticut. Newington, CT: State of Connecticut Department of Revenue Services, Division of Special Revenue.Google Scholar
  29. Wynne, H. J., Smith, G. J., & Volberg, R. A. (1994). Gambling and problem gambling in Alberta (Report prepared for Alberta Lotteries and Gaming). Edmonton, Alberta: Author.Google Scholar
  30. Wynne Resources & Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission (AADAC). (1998). Adult gambling and problem gambling in Alberta, 1998. Edmonton, Alberta: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Hodgins
    • 1
  • Harold Wynne
    • 2
  • Karyn Makarchuk
    • 3
  1. 1.Addiction Centre, Calgary Regional Health Authority. David C. Hodgins, Addiction Centre, Foothills Medical CenterUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Wynne Resources LtdCanada
  3. 3.University of CalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations