Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 29–120 | Cite as

A Plea For Monsters

  • Philippe Schlenker
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abusch, Dorit: 1997, ‘Sequence of Tense and Temporal De Re’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 1–50.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. R. and E. L. Keenan: 1985, ‘Deixis’, in M. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Grammatical Categories in the Lexicon, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1975, ‘The First Person’, reprinted in Quassim Cassam (ed.), Self-Knowledge.Google Scholar
  4. Banfield, Ann: 1982, Unspeakable Sentences (Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  5. Barentsen, Adrian: 1996, ‘Shifting Points of Orientation in Modern Russian: Tense Selection in “Reported Perception”’, in Theo Janssen and Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Reported Speech.Google Scholar
  6. Bäuerle, R.: 1983, ‘Pragmatisch-semantische Aspekte der NP-Interpretation’, in M. Faust et al. (eds.), Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie und Textlinguistik, Tübingen, pp. 121–131.Google Scholar
  7. Benthem, J. van: 1978, ‘Tense Logic and Standard Logic’, Logique et Analyse 80, 47–83.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, Patrick, M. de Rijke and Y. Venema: 2001: Modal Logic, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 53.Google Scholar
  9. Boolos, George: 1984, ‘To Be is to Be a Value of a Variable (or to Be Some Values of Some Variables)’, Journal of Philosophy 81, 430–449.Google Scholar
  10. Burge, Tyler: 1974, ‘Demonstrative Constructions, Reference, and Truth’, The Journal of Philosophy 71(7), 205–223.Google Scholar
  11. Cassam, Quassim (ed.): 1994, Self-Knowledge, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1966, ‘He: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness’, Ratio 7.Google Scholar
  13. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1967, ‘Indicators and Quasi-Indicators’, American Philosophical Quarterly 4(2).Google Scholar
  14. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1968, ‘On the Logic of Attributions of Self-Knowledge to Others’, The Journal of Philosophy 65(15).Google Scholar
  15. Chierchia, Gennaro: 1989, ‘Anaphora and Attitudes De Se’, in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem and van Emde Boas (eds.), Language in Context, Foris, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  16. Clements, George N.: 1975, ‘The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse’, Journal of West African Languages 10, 141–177.Google Scholar
  17. Comrie, Bernard: 1985, Tense, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, Robin: 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  19. Cresswell, Max: 1990, Entities and Indices, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Dekker, Paul: 2000, ‘Coreference and Representationalism’, in K. von Heusinger and U. Egli (eds.), Reference and Anaphoric Relations, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  21. Doron, Edit: 1991, ‘Point of View as a Factor of Content’, SALT I.Google Scholar
  22. Farkas, Donka: 1997, ‘Evaluation Indices and Scope’, in Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope-Taking, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. Fintel, Kai von: 1997, ‘The Presupposition of Subjunctive Conditionals’, in Orin Percus and Uli Sauerland (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25.Google Scholar
  24. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt: 1985, ‘Logophoric Systems in Chadic’, J. African Languages and Linguistics 7, 23–37.Google Scholar
  25. Frege, Gottlob: 1892, ‘Ñber Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, pp. 25–50. Reprinted in Frege, ‘Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung’, in G. Patzig (ed.), Göttingen (1986).Google Scholar
  26. Haas-Spohn, Ulrike: 1995, Versteckte Indexikalität und subjektive Bedeutung, Studia Grammatica 38, Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Hagège, Claude: 1974, ‘Les Pronoms Logophoriques’, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69, 287–310.Google Scholar
  28. Hale, Kenneth and Paul Platero: 1996, ‘Negative Polarity Expressions in Navajo’, ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  29. Heim, Irene: 1991a, ‘Artikel und Definitheit’, in A. v. Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Handbuch der Semantik, de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  30. Heim, Irene: 1991b, Class hand-outs on ‘Control’ (Seminar taught by Heim & Higginbotham, Spring 1991): ‘Interpretation of PRO’ (Feb. 22), ‘The First Person’ (March 8), and a hand-out on ‘Connectedness’ (April 12).Google Scholar
  31. Heim, Irene: 1994a, ‘Puzzling Reflexive Pronouns in de se Reports’, hand-out, Bielefeld Conference, March.Google Scholar
  32. Heim, Irene: 1994b, ‘Comments on Abusch's Theory of Tense’, in H. Kamp (ed.), Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, University of Amsterdam, pp. 143–170.Google Scholar
  33. Heim, Irene: 2002, ‘Features of Pronouns in Semantics and Morphology’, hand-out of a talk given at USC on 01.13.02.Google Scholar
  34. Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. Higginbotham, James: 2000, ‘Competence with Demonstratives’, to appear in B. Ramberg and M. Hahn (eds.), Festschrift for Tyler Burge.Google Scholar
  36. Hyman, Larry M. (ed.): 1979, Aghem Grammatical Structure, Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 7.Google Scholar
  37. Hyman, Larry M. and Bernard Comrie: 1981, ‘Logophoric Reference in Gokana’, Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3, 19–37.Google Scholar
  38. Iatridou, Sabine: 1994, ‘On the Contribution of Conditional Then’, Natural Language Semantics 2, 171–199.Google Scholar
  39. Israel, David and John Perry: 1996, ‘Where Monsters Dwell’, in Seligman and Westerståhl (ed.), Logic, Language and Computation Vol. 1.Google Scholar
  40. Jacobson, Pauline: 1999, ‘Towards a Variable-Free Semantics’, Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 117–184.Google Scholar
  41. Jäger, Siegfried: 1971, Der Konjunktiv in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart, Max Hueber, Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Janssen, Theo and Wim van der Wurff (ed.): 1996, Reported Speech, John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  43. Kadmon, Nirit: 2001, Formal Pragmatics, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Kaplan, David: 1969, ‘Quantifying In’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplan, David: 1990, ‘Thoughts on Demonstratives’, in P. Yourgrau (ed.), Demonstratives, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kaplan, David: 1977/1989, ‘Demonstratives’, in Almog, Perry, and Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kaplan, David: 1989, ‘Afterthoughts’, in Almog, Perry, and Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kaplan, David: 2001, ‘The Meaning of Ouch and Oops (Explorations in the Theory of Meaning as Use)’, Draft #3, ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
  49. Kondrashov, D. and N. Kondrashova: 1999, ‘Double-Access Double-Decker: Where Semantics can get a Free Ride on Syntax’, hand-out, Thermi Conference on Tense, Aspect and Mood.Google Scholar
  50. Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche: 1989, ‘Pronouns, Logical Variables, and Logophoricity in Abe’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 4.Google Scholar
  51. Kratzer, Angelika: 1991, ‘Conditionals’, in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung.Google Scholar
  52. Kratzer, Angelika: 1997, ‘Impersonal Pronouns and Logophoricity’, Hand-out of a talk given at Sinn und Bedeutung – II, Berlin, December.Google Scholar
  53. Kratzer, Angelika: 1998, ‘More Structural Analogies between Pronouns and Tenses’, Proceedings of SALT VIII.Google Scholar
  54. Kuhn, Steven: 1980, ‘Quantifiers as Modal Operators’, Studia Logica 39, 145–158.Google Scholar
  55. Kuno, Susumu: 1972, ‘Pronominalization, Reflexivization, and Direct Discourse’, Linguistic Inquiry 3(2): 161–195.Google Scholar
  56. Kusumoto, Kiyomi: 1998, ‘Tenses as Logophoric Pronouns’, Handout of talk given at the MIT/UConn/UMass Semantics Workshop, October 31, 1998 (UConn).Google Scholar
  57. Larson, Richard and G. Segal: 1995, Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Leslau, Wolf: 1995, Reference Grammar of Amharic, Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  59. Lewis, David: 1979, ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, The Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.Google Scholar
  60. Lewis, David: 1983, 'Postscript to 'General Semantics'', in Philosophical Papers I, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mitchell, Jonathan: 1986, The Formal Semantics of Point of View, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  62. Morgan, Jerry: 1970, ‘On the Criterion of Identity for Noun Phrase Deletion’, CLS 6.Google Scholar
  63. Pan, Hai-Hua: 1997, Constraints on Reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese, Garland.Google Scholar
  64. Partee, Barbara: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English’, J. Philosophy 70, 601–609.Google Scholar
  65. Partee, Barbara: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’, Linguisics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.Google Scholar
  66. Partee, Barbara: 1989, ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’, CLS 25.Google Scholar
  67. Perry, John: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review 86.Google Scholar
  68. Perry, John: 1979, ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs 13, 3–21. Reprinted in N. Salmon and S. Soames (eds.), Propositions and Attitudes, Oxford University Press (1988).Google Scholar
  69. Predelli, Stefano: 1998, ‘Utterance, Interpretation and the Logic of Indexicals’, Mind and Language 13, 400–414.Google Scholar
  70. Quine, W. V.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, J. Philosophy 53.Google Scholar
  71. Quine, W. V.: 1960, ‘Variables Explained Away’, reprinted in Quine, Selected Logic Papers, Harvard University Press (1995).Google Scholar
  72. Recanati, François: 1993, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  73. Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, ‘Point of View in Language – The Use of Parentheticals’, in Gisa Rauh (ed.), Essays on Deixis, Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  74. Reinhart, Tanya: 1991, ‘Self-Representation’, Manuscript.Google Scholar
  75. Roncador, Manfred von: 1988, Zwischen direkter und indirekter Rede, Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  76. Rooth, Mats: 1996, ‘Focus’, in Lappin (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
  77. Schlenker, Phlippe: 1999, Propositional Attitudes and Indexicality (A Cross-Categorial Approach), Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  78. Scott, Dana: 1970, ‘Advice on Modal Logic’, in K. Lambert (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Logic. Recent Developments, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 143–173.Google Scholar
  79. Sharvit, Yael: 2001, ‘Hebrew “Past-under-Past” Sentences and the SOT Parameter’, Hand-out of a talk given at the Conference on the Syntax and Semantics of Semitic Languages, USC, May 4–5.Google Scholar
  80. Speas, Peggy: 1999, ‘Person and Point of View in Navajo Direct Discourse Complements’, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  81. Stalnaker, Robert: 1975, ‘Indicative Conditionals’, Philosophia 5, 269–286.Google Scholar
  82. Stalnaker, Robert: 1978, ‘Assertion’, in Syntax and Semantics,Vol.9, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  83. Stalnaker, Robert: 1981, ‘Indexical Belief’, Synthese 49.Google Scholar
  84. Stalnaker, Robert: 1999, Context and Content, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Stechow, Arnim von: 1982, ‘Structured Propositions’, Papier Nr. 59, SFB 99, Konstanz.Google Scholar
  86. Stechow, Arnim von: 2001, ‘Schlenker's Monsters’, Hand-out of a Talk Given at UCLA, April 4th, 2001 (available at http://www2.sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de/arnim/Schlenkers.Monster.pdf)Google Scholar
  87. Stechow, Arnim von: 2002, ‘Binding by Verbs: Tense, Person and Mood under Attitudes’, manuscript, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  88. Stone, Matthew: 1997, ‘The Anaphoric Parallel between Modality and Tense’, IRCS Report 97-06, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  89. Thomas, Elaine: 1978, A Grammatical Description of the Engenni Language, Summer Institute of Linguistics Publication Number 60.Google Scholar
  90. Weinstein, Scott: 1974, ‘Truth and Demonstratives’, Noûs 8, 179–184.Google Scholar
  91. Zimmermann, Thomas Ede: 1991, ‘Kontextabhängigkeit’, in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Schlenker
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut Jean-NicodParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsUCLALos AngelesU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations