Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 281–304 | Cite as

What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features?

  • Pat Auger
  • Paul Burke
  • Timothy M. Devinney
  • Jordan J. Louviere
Article

Abstract

The importance of ethical consumerism to many companies worldwide has increased dramatically in recent years. Ethical consumerism encompasses the importance of non-traditional and social components of a company's products and business process to strategic success – such as environmental protectionism, child labor practices and so on. The present paper utilizes a random utility theoretic experimental design to provide estimates of the relative value selected consumers place on the social features of products.

animal rights choice modeling ethical consumerism willingness-to-pay workers' rights 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaker, J.: 1997, ‘Dimensions of Brand Personality’, Journal of Marketing Research 34(3), 347–356.Google Scholar
  2. Aaker, J. and D. Mahaeswaran: 1997, ‘The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion’, Journal of Consumer Research 24(4), 315–328.Google Scholar
  3. Abratt, R. and D. Sacks: 1988, ‘The Marketing Challenge: Towards Being Profitable and Socially Responsible’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 497–508.Google Scholar
  4. Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein: 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NY).Google Scholar
  5. AsiaWeek: 2001, ‘Fair Pay’, 27(1).Google Scholar
  6. Bhate, S. and K. Lawler: 1997, ‘Environmentally Friendly Products: Factors That Influence Their Adoption’, Technovation 17(8), 457–465.Google Scholar
  7. CAFOD: 1998, ‘Views from the South, Conference Report on Ethical Trade’, September, http://www. cafod.org/uk/policyviews.htm.Google Scholar
  8. Calder, B., L. Phillips and A. Tybout: 1981, ‘Designing Research for Application’, Journal of Consumer Research 8(3), 197–207.Google Scholar
  9. Calder, B.: 1982, ‘The Concept of External Validity’, Journal of Consumer Research 9(4), 240–244.Google Scholar
  10. Christie, R. and F. L. Geis: 1970, Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  11. Click, J.: 1996, ‘New Business Standards Focus on Human Rights’, HRMagazine 41(6), 65–72.Google Scholar
  12. Crane, A.: 2001, ‘Unpacking the Ethical Product’, Journal of Business Ethics 30, 361–373.Google Scholar
  13. Economist: 1999, ‘Business Ethics: Sweatshop Wars’, 27 February, 68–69.Google Scholar
  14. Edmonds, E. and N. Pavcnik: 2002, ‘Does Globalization Increase Child Labor? Evidence from Vietnam’, Working paper No. 8760, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, K. A. and R. B. Freeman: 2001, ‘White Hats or Don Quixotes? Human Rights Vigilantes in the Global Economy’, Working paper No. 8102, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Erdem, T. and J. Swait: 1998, ‘Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon’, Journal of Consumer Psychology 7(2), 131–157.Google Scholar
  17. Fairclough, G.: 1996, ‘It Isn't Black and White’, Far Eastern Economic Review 159(10), 54–57.Google Scholar
  18. Folkes, V. S. and M. A. Kamins: 1999, ‘Effects of Information About Firms' Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers' Attitudes’, Journal of Consumer Psychology 8(3), 243–259.Google Scholar
  19. Fullerton, S., K. B. Kerch and H. R. Dodge: 1996, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Assessment of Individual Behavior in the Market Place’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(7), 805–814.Google Scholar
  20. Garrett, D. E.: 1986, ‘Consumer Boycotts: Are the Targets Always the Bad Guys' Business and Society Review (Summer), 17–21.Google Scholar
  21. Glendon, M. A.: 1998, ‘Propter Honoris Respectum: Knowing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, Notre Dame Law Review 73(5), 1153–1190.Google Scholar
  22. Lerner, L. D. and G. E. Fryxell: 1988, ‘An Empirical Study of the Predictors of Corporate Performance: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics 7(12), 951–959.Google Scholar
  23. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher and J. D. Swait: 2000, Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.).Google Scholar
  24. Luh, S. S.: 2001, ‘Nike Factories Accused of Intimidating Workers’, Asian Wall Street Journal (17 May).Google Scholar
  25. Luzar, E. J. and K. J. Cossé: 1998, ‘Willingness to Pay or Intention to Pay: The Attitude-Behavior Relationship in Contingent Valuation’, Journal of Socio-Economics 27(3), 427–444.Google Scholar
  26. Manrai, L. A., A. K. Manrai, D. N. Lascu and J. R. Ryans Jr.: 1997, ‘How Green-Claim Strength and Country Disposition Affect Product Evaluation and Company Image’, Psychology and Marketing 14(5), 511–537.Google Scholar
  27. Marymount University Center for Ethical Concerns: 1999, ‘The Consumers and Sweatshops’, November, http://www.marymount.edu/news/ garmentstudy/overview.html.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, C.: 1997, ‘Marketers Weigh the Effects of Sweatshop Crackdown’, Marketing News 31(10), 1, 19.Google Scholar
  29. Osterhus, T. L.: 1997, ‘Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and How Do They Work?’, Journal of Marketing 61(4), 16–29.Google Scholar
  30. Pitts, R. E., J. K. Wong and D. J. Whalen: 1991, ‘Consumers' Evaluative Structures in Two Ethical Situations: A Means-End Approach’, Journal of Business Research 22(2), 119–130.Google Scholar
  31. Ranjan, P.: 2001, ‘Credit Constraints and the Phenomenon of Child Labor’, Journal of Development Economics 64, 81–102.Google Scholar
  32. Rest, J.: 1983, ‘Morality’, in P. H. Mussein (series ed.), and J. Flavell and E. Markman (vol. eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive Development, 4th Edition (Wiley, New York), pp. 556–629.Google Scholar
  33. Rest, J.: 1984, ‘The Major Components of Morality’, in W. Kurtines and J. Gerwitz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (Wiley, New York), pp. 24–40.Google Scholar
  34. Rest, J.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York).Google Scholar
  35. Rest, J., L. Edwards and S. Thoma: 1997, ‘Designing and Validating a Measure of Moral Judgment: Stage Preference and Stage Consistency Approaches’, Journal of Educational Psychology 89(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
  36. Rest, J., D. Narvaez, M. J. Bebeau and S. J. Thoma: 1999, Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach (Lawrence Erlbaum Press, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
  37. Roberts, J. A.: 1996, ‘Will the Real Socially Responsible Consumer Please Step Forward?’, Business Horizons 39(1), 79–83.Google Scholar
  38. Shrum, L. J., J. A. McCarty and T. M. Lowrey: 1995, ‘Buyer Characteristics of the Green Consumer and Their Implications for Advertising Strategy’, Journal of Advertising 24(2), 71–82.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, C. S. and A. C. Copetas: 1998, ‘Former Chinese Prisoner Claims Adidas Balls Were Made in Prison’, Wall Street Journal (26 June).Google Scholar
  40. Sriram, V. and A. M. Forman: 1993, ‘The Relative Importance of Products' Environmental Attributes: A Cross-Cultural Comparison’, International Marketing Review 10(3), 51–70.Google Scholar
  41. Teoh, S. H., I. Welch and C. P. Wazzan: 1999, ‘The Effect of Socially Activist Investment Policies on the Financial Markets: Evidence from The South African Boycott’, Journal of Business 72(1), 35–89.Google Scholar
  42. Thoma, S. J., J. Rest and R. Barnett: 1986, ‘Moral Judgment, Behavior, Decision Making, and Attitudes, in J. Rest (ed.), Moral Development: Advances in Theory and Research (Praeger, New York), pp. 133–175.Google Scholar
  43. Whalen, D. J., R. E. Pitts and J. K. Wong: 1991, ‘Exploring the Structure of Ethical Attributions as a Component of the Consumer Decision Model: The Vicarious Versus Personal Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(4), 285–293.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pat Auger
    • 1
  • Paul Burke
    • 2
  • Timothy M. Devinney
    • 2
  • Jordan J. Louviere
    • 3
  1. 1.Melbourne Business SchoolCarlton, VictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Graduate School of ManagementSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.University of TechnologyHaymarket, SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations