Climatic Change

, Volume 57, Issue 1–2, pp 9–42 | Cite as

Understanding Climatic Impacts, Vulnerabilities, and Adaptation in the United States: Building a Capacity for Assessment

  • Edward A. Parson
  • Robert W. Corell
  • Eric J. Barron
  • Virginia Burkett
  • Anthony Janetos
  • Linda Joyce
  • Thomas R. Karl
  • Michael C. MacCracken
  • Jerry Melillo
  • M. Granger Morgan
  • David S. Schimel
  • Thomas Wilbanks


Based on the experience of the U.S. National Assessment, we propose a program of research and analysis to advance capability for assessment of climate impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation options. We identify specific priorities for scientific research on the responses of ecological and socioeconomic systems to climate and other stresses; for improvement in the climatic inputs to impact assessments; and for further development of assessment methods to improve their practical utility to decision-makers. Finally, we propose a new institutional model for assessment, based principally on regional efforts that integrate observations, research, data, applications, and assessment on climate and linked environmental-change issues. The proposed program will require effective collaboration between scientists, resource managers, and other stakeholders, all of whose expertise is needed to define and prioritize key regional issues, characterize relevant uncertainties, and assess potential responses. While both scientifically and organizationally challenging, such an integrated program holds the best promise of advancing our capacity to manage resources and the economy adaptively under a changing climate.


United States Resource Manager Impact Assessment Assessment Method National Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adger, W. N. and Kelly, P. M.: 1999, ‘Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and the Architecture of Entitlements’, Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change 4, 253–266.Google Scholar
  2. Alberto, A. M. P., Ziska, L. H., Cervancia, C. R., and Manalo, P. A.: 1996, ‘The Influence of Increasing Carbon Dioxide and Temperature on Competitive Interactions between a C3 Crop, Rice (Oryza sativa), and a C4 Weed (Echinochloa glabrescens)’, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23, 795–802.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, M. P. and Lombardero, M. J.: 2000, ‘Assessing the Consequences of Global Change for Forest Disturbance from Herbivores and Pathogens’, Sci. Total Environ. 26, 263–286.Google Scholar
  4. Berkhout, F. and Hertin, J.: 2000, ‘Socio–Economic Scenarios for Climate Impact Assessment’, Global Environ. Chang 10, 165–168.Google Scholar
  5. Boer, G. J., Flato, G. M., and Ramsden, D.: 1999b, ‘A Transient Climate Change Simulation with Historical and Projected Greenhouse Gas and Aerosol Forcing: Projected Climate for the 21st Century’, Clim. Dyn. 16, 427–450.Google Scholar
  6. Boer, G. J., Flato, G. M., Reader, M. C., and Ramsden, D.: 1999a, ‘A Transient Climate Change Simulation with Historical and Projected Greenhouse Gas and Aerosol Forcing: Experimental Design and Comparison with the Instrumental Record for the 20th Century’, Clim. Dyn. 16, 405–426.Google Scholar
  7. Bohle, H. G., Downing, T. E., and Watts, M. J.: 1994, ‘Climate Change and Social Vulnerability: Toward a Sociology and Geography of Food Insecurity’, Global Environ. Change 4, 37–48.Google Scholar
  8. Broecker, W. S.: 1987, ‘Unpleasant Surprises in the Greenhouse’, Nature 328, 123–126.Google Scholar
  9. Broecker, W. S: 1997, ‘Thermohaline Circulation, the Achilles Heel of our Climate System: Will Manmade CO2 Upset the Current Balance?’, Science 278, 1582–1588.Google Scholar
  10. Bryant, C. R., Smit, B., Brklacich, M., Johnston, T. R., Smithers, J., Chiotti, Q., and Singh, B.: 2000, ‘Adaptation in Canadian Agriculture to Climatic Variability and Change’, Clim. Change 45, 181–201.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, G. E., Moser, S. C., Ratick, S. J., Dow, K., Meyer, W. B., Emani, S., Jin, W., Kasperson, J. X., Iasperson, R.K, and Schwarz, H. E.: 1998, ‘Assessing the Vulnerability of Coastal Communities to Extreme Storms: The Case of Revere, MA, U.S.A.’, Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change 3, 59–82.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, W. C., Jaeger, J., Corell, R., Kasperson, R., McCarthy, J. J., Cash, D., Cohen, S. J., Desanker, P., Dickson, N. M., Epsteon, P., Guston, D. H., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C., Janetos, A., Leary, N., Levy, M. A., Luers, A., MacCracken, M., Melillo, J., Moss, R., Nigg, J. M., Parry, M. L., Parson, E.A., Ribot, J. C., Schellnhuber, H.–J., Schrag, D. P., Seilestad, G. A., Shea, E., Vogel, C., and Wilbanks, T. J.: 2000, ‘Assessing Vulnerability to Global Environmental Risks’, Report of the Workshop on Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change: Challenges for Research, Assessment and Decision Making. May 22–25, 2000, Airlie House, Warrenton, Virginia. BCSIA Discussion Paper 2000–12, Environment and Natural Resources Program, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  13. Conroy, J. P., Seneweera, S., Basra, A. S., Roger, G., and Nissenwooler, B.: 1994, ‘Influence of Rising Atmospheric CO2 Temperature on Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality of Cereal Crops’, Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 21, 741–758.Google Scholar
  14. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton, P., and van den Belt, M.: 1997, ‘The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital’, Nature 387, 259.Google Scholar
  15. Cramer, W., Shugart, H. H., Noble, I. R., Woodward, F. I., Bugmann, H., Bondeau, A., Foley, J. A., Gardner, R. H., Lauenroth, W. K., Pitelka, L. F., and Sutherst, R.W.: 1999, ‘Ecosystem Composition and Structure’, in Walker, B., Steffen, W., Canadell, J., and Ingram, J. (eds.), The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change, Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 190–228.Google Scholar
  16. Cutter, S. L.: 1996, ‘Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards’, Prog. Hum. Geog. 20, 529–539.Google Scholar
  17. Downing, T. E. (ed.): 1996, Climate Change and World Food Security, Springer, Berlin, 662 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Downing, T. E., Butterfield, R., Cohen, S., Huq, S., Moss, R., Rahman, A., Sokona, Y., and Stephen, L.: 2000, ‘Climate Change Vulnerability: Toward a Framework for Understanding Adaptability to Climate Change Impacts’, Report to the United Nations Environment Programme, Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  19. Duke, J. S. and Mooney, H. A.: 1999, ‘Does Global Change Increase the Success of Biological Invaders?’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14, 135–139.Google Scholar
  20. Easterling, W. E., Crosson, P. R., Rosenberg, N. J., McKenney, M. S., Katz, L.A., and Lemon, K. M.: 1993, ‘Agricultural Impacts of and Responses to Climate Change in theMissouri–Iowa–Nebraska–Kansas (MINK) Region’, Clim. Change 24, 23–61.Google Scholar
  21. Glantz, M. H. (ed.): 1998 Societal Responses to Regional Climatic Change: Forecasting by Analogy. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  22. Gregory, P. J., Ingram, J. S. I., Campbell, B., Goudriaan, J., Hunt, L. A., Landsberg, J. J., Linder, S., Stafford Smith, M., Sutherst, R. W., and Valentin, C.: 1999, ‘Managed Production Systems’, in Walker, B., Steffen, W., Canadell, J., and Ingram, J. (eds.), The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change, Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 229–270.Google Scholar
  23. Heal, G.: 1997, ‘Discounting and Climate Change’, Clim. Change 37, 335–343.Google Scholar
  24. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2000, Emissions Scenarios, Special Report of Working Group III, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2001a, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Third Assessment Report of Working Group I, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2001b, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Third Assessment Report of Working Group II, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. IRICP (International Research Institute for Climate Prediction): 2000, ‘Recent Information and References on El Nino Prediction’, Available at Scholar
  28. Johns T. C., Carnell, R. E., Crossley, J. F., Gregory, J. M., Mitchell, J. F. B., Senior, C. A., Tett, S. F. B., and Wood, R. A.: 1997, ‘The Second Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere GCM: Model Description, Spinup, and Validation’, Clim. Dyn. 13, 103–134.Google Scholar
  29. Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X., Turner II, B. L., Dow, K., and Meyer, W. B.: 1995, ‘Critical Environmental Regions: Concepts, Distinctions, and Issues’, in Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., and Turner II, B. L. (eds.), Regions at Risk: Comparisons of Threatened Environments, United Nations University Press, New York, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  30. Kane, S. and Yohe, G.: 2000, ‘Societal Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change: An Introduction’, Clim. Change 45, 1–4.Google Scholar
  31. Kates, R. W., Ausubel, J. H., and Berberian, M. (eds.): 1985. Climate Impact Assessment: Studies of the Impact of Climate and Society, John Wiley, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  32. Keith, D. W.: 1996, ‘When is it Appropriate to Combine Expert Judgments?’, Clim. Change 33, 139–144.Google Scholar
  33. Kelly, P. and Adger, W. N.: 2000, ‘Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change and Facilitating Adaptation’, Clim. Change 47, 325–352.Google Scholar
  34. Klein, R. J. T. and Nicholls, R. J.: 1999, ‘Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability to Climate Change’, Ambio 28, 182–187.Google Scholar
  35. Körner, C., Bazzaz, F. A., and Field, C. B.: 1996, ‘The Significance of Biological Variation, Organism Interactions, and Life Histories in CO2 Research’, in Körner, C. and Bazzaz, F. A. (eds.), Carbon Dioxide, Populations, and Communities, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 443–456.Google Scholar
  36. Lincoln D. E., Fajer, E. D., and Johnson, R. H.: 1993. ‘Plant–Insect Herbivore Interactions in Elevated CO2 Environments’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 64–68.Google Scholar
  37. Lorenzoni, I., Jordan, A., Hulme, M., Turner, R. K., and O'Riordan, T.: 2000, ‘A Co–Evolutionary Approach to Climate Change Impact Assessment: Part 1, Integrating Socio–Economic and Climate Change Scenarios’, Global Environ. Change 10, 57–68.Google Scholar
  38. MacCracken, M. C.: 2002, ‘Do the Uncertainty Ranges in the IPCC and U.S. National Assessments Account Adequately for Possibly Overlooked Climatic Influences?’, Clim. Change 52, 13–23.Google Scholar
  39. Mack, M. C. and D'Antonio, C. M.: 1998, ‘Impacts of Biological Invasions on Disturbance Regimes’, Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 195–198.Google Scholar
  40. Matsui T., Namuco, O. S., Ziska L. H., and Horie, T.: 1997, ‘Effects of High Temperature and CO2 Concentration on Spikelet Sterility in Indica Rice’, Field Crop. Res. 51, 213–219.Google Scholar
  41. Mayewski, P. A., Meeker, L. D., Twickler, M. S., Whitlow, S., Yang, Q. Z., Lyons, W. B., and Prentice, M.: 1997, ‘Major Features and Forcing of High–Latitude Northern Hemisphere Atmospheric Circulation using a 110 000 Year–Long Glaciochemical Series’, J. Geophysical. Res. Oceans 102, 345–366.Google Scholar
  42. Maxwell, B., Mayer, N., and Street, R.: 1997, The Canada Country Study: Climate Impacts and Adaptation, Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Environment Canada, Downsview, Ontario.Google Scholar
  43. Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. D., and Shaw, D.: 1994, ‘The Impact of Global Warming on Agriculture: A Ricardian Analysis’, Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 753–771.Google Scholar
  44. Meyer, W. B., Butzer, K. W., Downing, T. E., Turner II, B. L., Wenzel, G. W., and Wescoat, J. L.: 1998, ‘Reasoning by Analogy’, in Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 3: Tools for Analysis, Battle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 217–289.Google Scholar
  45. Miller, K. A., Rhodes, S. L., and MacDonnell, L. J.: 1997, ‘Water Allocation in a Changing Climate: Institutions and Adaptation’, Clim. Change 35, 157–177.Google Scholar
  46. Mimura, N. and Harasawa, H. (eds.): 2000, Data Book of Sea–Level Rise, 2000, Centre for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Environment Agency of Japan, Ibaraki, 280 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Mitchell J. F. B., Johns, T. C., Gregory, J. M., and Tett, S.: ‘Climate Response to Increasing Levels of Greenhouse Gases and Sulphate Aerosols’, Nature 376, 501–504.Google Scholar
  48. Morgan, M. G. and Dowlatabadi, H.: 1996, ‘Learning from Integrated Assessment of Climate Change’, Clim. Change 34, 337–368.Google Scholar
  49. Morgan, M. G. and Henrion, M.: 1990, Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Morgan, M. G., Kandlikar, M., Risbey, J., and Dowlatabadi, H.: 1999, ‘Why Conventional Tools for Policy Analysis Are often Inadequate for Problems of Global Change’, Clim. Change 41, 271–281.Google Scholar
  51. Morgan, M. G., Pitelka, L., and Shevliakova, E.: 2001, ‘Elicitation of Expert Judgments of Climate Change Impacts on Forest Ecosystems’, Clim. Change 49, 279–307.Google Scholar
  52. Moss, R. H. and Schneider, S. H.: 2000, ‘Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: Recommendations to Lead Authors for more Consistent Assessment and Reporting’, in Pachauri, R., Taniguchi, T., and Tanaka, K. (eds.), Guidance Papers on Cross–Cutting Issues in the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, Inter–governmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, pp. 33–51. Available at Scholar
  53. NAST (National Assessment Synthesis Team): 2000, Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. Overview, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  54. NAST (National Assessment Synthesis Team): 2001, Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. Foundation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  55. Nordhaus, W. D.: 1997, ‘Discounting in Economics and Climate Change’, Clim. Change 37, 315–328.Google Scholar
  56. NRC (National Research Council), Climate Research Committee: 1995, Natural Climate Variability on Decade–to–Century Time Scales, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  57. NRC (National Research Council), Committee on Risk Characterization: 1996, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  58. NRC (National Research Council), Climate Research Committee: 1998, Capacity of U.S. Climate Modeling to Support Climate Change Assessment Activities, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  59. NRC (National Research Council), Board on Sustainable Development: 1999a, Our Common Journey: A Transition toward Sustainability, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  60. NRC (National Research Council), Committee on Global Change Research: 1999b, Global Environmental Change, Research Pathways for the Next Decade, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  61. NRC (National Research Council), Panel on the Human Dimensions of Seasonal–to–Interannual Climate Variability: 1999c, Making Climate ForecastsMatter, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  62. Parry, M. and Livermore, M. (eds.): 1999, ‘A New Assessment of the Global Effects of Climate Change’, Global Environ. Change 9, Supp.Google Scholar
  63. Parson, E. A. and Fisher–Vanden, K.: 1997, ‘Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change’, Ann. Rev. Energ. Env. 22, 589–628.Google Scholar
  64. Parson, E. A. and Morgan, M. G.: 1998, ‘Guidance to Regional and Sectoral Teams for Analizing Socio–Economic and Ecological Impacts’, National Assessment Synthesis Team, U.S. Global Change Research Program. April 23, 1998. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  65. Patterson, D. T.: 1995, ‘Weeds in a Changing Climate’, Weed Sci. 43, 685–701.Google Scholar
  66. Patterson, D. T., Westbrook, J. K., Joyce, R. J. V., Lingren, P. D., and Rogasik, J.: 1999, ‘Weeds, Insects, and Diseases’, Clim. Change 43, 711–727.Google Scholar
  67. PCAST (President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology): 1997, Federal Energy Research and Development for the Challenges of the 21st Century, Report of the Energy Research and Development Panel, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  68. Petschel–Held, G., Block, A., Cassel–Gintz, M., Kropp, J., Ludeke, M. K. B., Moldenhauer, O., Reusswig, F., and Schellnhuber, H. J.: 1999, ‘Syndromes of Global Change: A Qualitative Modeling Approach to Assist Global Environmental Management’, Environ. Model. Assess. 4, 195–314.Google Scholar
  69. Prinn, R., Jacoby, H., Sokolov, A., Wang, C., Xiao, X., Yang, Z., Eckhaus, R., Stone, P., Ellerman, D., Melillo, J., Fitzmaurice, J., Kicklighter, D., Holian, G., and Liu, Y.: 1999, ‘Integrated Global System Model for Climate Policy Assessment: Feedbacks and Sensitivity Studies’, Clim. Change 41, 469–546.Google Scholar
  70. Reilly, J., Hohmann, N., and Kane, S.: 1994, ‘Climate Change and Agricultural Trade:Who Benefits, Who Loses?’ Global Environ. Change 4, 24–36.Google Scholar
  71. Reilly, J. and Schimmelpfennig, D.: 2000, ‘Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Learning: Portrait of Adaptation to Long–Term Climate Change’, Clim. Change 45, 253–278.Google Scholar
  72. Ribot, J. C.: 1995, ‘The Causal Structure of Vulnerability: Its Application to Climate Impact Analysis’, GeoJournal 35, 119–122.Google Scholar
  73. Ribot, J. C., Najam, A., and Watson, G.: 1996, ‘Climate Variation, Vulnerability and Sustainable Development in the Semi–arid Tropics’, in Ribot, J. C., Magalhães, A. R., and Panagides, S. S. (eds.), Climate Variability, Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the Semi–arid Tropics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 13–54.Google Scholar
  74. Risbey, J., Kandlikar, M., Dowlatabadi, H., and Graetz, D.: 1999, ‘Scale, Context, and Decision Making in Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change’, Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change 4, 137–165.Google Scholar
  75. Rosenberg, N. and Crosson, P.: 1993, ‘An Overview of the MINK Study’, Clim. Change 24, 159–173.Google Scholar
  76. Rosenzweig, C. and Parry, M.: 1994, ‘Potential Impacts of Climate Change on World Food Supply’, Nature 367, 133–139.Google Scholar
  77. Rotmans, J. and Dowlatabadi, H.: 1998, ‘Integrated Assessment Modeling’, in Rayner, S., and Malone, E. L. (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change: An International Assessment, Vol. 3, ‘Tools for Policy Analysis’, Chapter 5, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  78. Sala, O. E., Chapin III, F. S., Gardner, R. H., Lauenroth, W. K., Mooney, H. A., and Ramakrishnan, P. S.: 1999, ‘Global Change, Biodiversity and Ecological Complexity’, inWalker, B., Steffen, W., Canadell, J., and Ingram, J., (eds.), The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change, Implications for natural and managed ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 304–328.Google Scholar
  79. Schneider, S. H., Easterling, W. E., and Mearns, L. O.: 2000, ‘Adaptation: Sensitivity to Natural Variability, Agent Assumptions and Dynamic Climate Changes’, Clim. Change 45, 203–221.Google Scholar
  80. Schneider, S. H., Turner II, B. L., and Garriga, H. M.: 1997, ‘Imaginable Surprise in Global Change Science’, J. Risk Res. 1, 165–185.Google Scholar
  81. Sen, A. K.: 1990, ‘Food, Economics, and Entitlements’, in Dreze, J. and Sen, A. K. (eds.), The Political Economy of Hunger, Vol. 1., Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 34–52.Google Scholar
  82. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Street, R.: 1999, ‘The Science of Adaptation: A Framework for Assessment’, Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change 4, 199–213.Google Scholar
  83. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Wandel, J.: 2000, ‘An Anatomy of Adaptation to Climate Change and Climate Variability’, Clim. Change 45, 225–251.Google Scholar
  84. Smith, J. B., Tol, R. S. J., Ragland, S., and Fankhauser, S.: 1998, ‘Proactive Adaptations to Climate Change: Three Case Studies on Infrastructure Investments’, IVM Discussion Paper D98/03.Google Scholar
  85. Terleckyj, N. E.: 1999, ‘Analytic Documentation of Three Alternate Socioeconomic Projections, 1997–2050’, NPA Data Services, Inc., Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  86. Tol, R. S. J.: 1997, ‘The Social Cost Controversy’, in Sors, A., Liberatore, A., Funtowicz, S., Hourcade, J. C., and Fellous, J. L. (eds.), Prospects for Integrated Environmental Assessment: Proceedings of the International Symposium, DG–11, European Commission.Google Scholar
  87. Tol, R. S. J. and Fankhauser, S.: 1997, ‘On the Representation of Impact in Integrated Assessment Models of Climate Change’, Environ. Model. Assess. 3, 63–74.Google Scholar
  88. Tol, R. S. J., Fankhauser, S., and Smith, J. B.: 1998, ‘The Scope for Adaptation to Climate Change: What Can We Learn from the Impact Literature?’, Global Environ. Change 8, 109–123.Google Scholar
  89. Tol, R. S. J., van der Grijp, N. M, Olsthoorn, A. A., and van der Werff, P. E.: 1999, Adapting to Climate Change: A Case Study on Riverine Flood Risks in the Netherlands, SIRCH Working Paper 5, Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  90. UKCIP (U.K. Climate Impacts Programme): 1999, ‘Socio–Economic Future Scenarios for Climate Impact Assessment: Final Report’, Science and Technology Policy Research.Google Scholar
  91. UKCIP (U.K. Climate Impacts Programme): 2000, Climate change: Assessing the Impacts–Identifying Responses. The First Three Years of the UK Climate Impacts Programme, U.K. Department of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions.Google Scholar
  92. UKDETR (U.K. Department of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions): 1997, ‘The Climate Impacts LINK Project: Applying Results from the Hadley Centre's Climate Change Experiments for Climate Change Impacts Assessments’, Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  93. UNEP, Feenstra, J., Burton, I., Smith, J., and Tol, R. (eds.): 1998, Handbook on Methods for Climate Impact Assessment and Adaptation, Strategies United Nations Environment Programme and Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  94. Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco J., and Melillo, J. M.: 1997, ‘Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems’, Science 277, 494–499.Google Scholar
  95. Volney, W., and Jan, A.: 1996, ‘Climate Change and Management of Insect Defoliators in Boreal Forest Ecosystems’, in Apps, M. J. and Price, D. T. (eds.), Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management, and the Global Carbon Cycle, NATO ASI Series, Vol. I 40, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
  96. Woodward, F. I.: 1987, Climate and Plant Distribution, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  97. Yohe, G., Neumann, J., Marshall, P., and Ameden, H.: 1996, ‘The Economic Cost of Greenhouse–Induced Sea–Level Rise for Developed Property in the United States’, Clim. Change 32, 387–410.Google Scholar
  98. Yohe, G. and Schlesinger, M.: 1998, ‘Sea–Level Change: The Expected Economic Cost of Protection or Abandonment in the United States’, Clim. Change, 38, 437–472.Google Scholar
  99. Ziska, L. H.: 2000, ‘The Impact of Elevated CO2 on Yield Loss from a C3 and C4 Weed in Field–Grown Soybean’, Glob. Change Biol. 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
  100. Ziska, L. H. and Bunce, J. A.: 1997, ‘Influence of Increasing Carbon Dioxide Concentration on the Photosynthetic and Growth Stimulation of Selected C4 Crops and Weeds’, Photosynth. Res. 54, 199–208.Google Scholar
  101. Ziska, L. H. and Caulfield, F. A.: 2000, ‘Rising CO2 and Pollen Production of Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), A Known Allergy–Inducing Species: Implications for Public Health’, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27, 10.Google Scholar
  102. Ziska, L. H. and Manalo, P. A.: 1996, ‘Increasing Night Temperature Can Reduce Seed Set and Potential Yield of Tropical Rice’, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23, 791–794.Google Scholar
  103. Ziska, L. H. and Teasdale, J. R.: 2000, ‘Sustained Growth and Increased Tolerance to Glyphosate Observed in a C3 Perennial Weed, Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens), Grown at Elevated Carbon Dioxide’, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27, 159–166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward A. Parson
    • 1
  • Robert W. Corell
    • 2
  • Eric J. Barron
    • 3
  • Virginia Burkett
    • 4
  • Anthony Janetos
    • 5
  • Linda Joyce
    • 6
  • Thomas R. Karl
    • 7
  • Michael C. MacCracken
    • 8
  • Jerry Melillo
    • 9
  • M. Granger Morgan
    • 10
  • David S. Schimel
    • 11
  • Thomas Wilbanks
    • 12
  1. 1.John F. Kennedy School of GovernmentHarvard UniversityCambridgeU.S.A.
  2. 2.American Meteorological SocietyU.S.A
  3. 3.Pennsylvania State UniversityU.S.A
  4. 4.U.S.GS National Wetlands Research CenterU.S.A
  5. 5.World Resources InstituteU.S.A
  6. 6.U.S.DA Forest ServiceU.S.A
  7. 7.NOAA National Climatic Data CenterU.S.A
  8. 8.U.S. Global Change Research Program and Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryU.S.A
  9. 9.Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological LaboratoryU.S.A
  10. 10.Carnegie-Mellon UniversityU.S.A
  11. 11.Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry and National Center for Atmospheric ResearchU.S.A
  12. 12.Oak Ridge National LaboratoryU.S.A

Personalised recommendations