Skip to main content
Log in

Mediators of the Relation Between Beliefs in a Just World and Emotional Responses to Negative Outcomes

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research shows that strong believers in a just world respond with less negative and more positive emotion to their own negative outcomes than do weak believers. The present study investigated mediators of this relation. We proposed that strong believers in a just world (versus weak believers) would make stronger internal and weaker external attributions for their negative outcomes, leading to reduced perceived unfairness, which, in turn, was expected to lead to less negative and more positive emotion. We assessed the just world beliefs of a sample of undergraduates as well as measuring their cognitive and emotional responses to an exam grade. Mediational analyses showed that our data were consistent with the processes proposed above. Various cognitive and motivational interpretations of the present findings are discussed

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Reese, L., and Adams, N. E. (1982). Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS: Structural Equations Program Manual. BMDP Statistical Software, Inc., University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychol. Bull. 112: 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 289–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., DeGregorio, E., and Gillis, R. (1980). Ego-defensive attribution among two categories of observers. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 6: 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clewes, J. L., and Endler, N. S. (1994). State-trait anxiety and the experience of elective surgery in children. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 26: 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C. (1993). Gefährdung des Wohlbefindens durch Arbeitsplatzunsicherheit: Eine Analyse der Einflußfaktoren Selbstwert und Gerechte-Welt-Glaube. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitpsychologie 4: 294–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C. (1998). Belief in a just world, well-being, and coping with an unjust fate. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York, pp. 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H., and Stephan, W. G. (1980). Attributions for exam performance. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 10: 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In Scherer, K. S., and Ekman, P. (eds.), Approaches to Emotion. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 319–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1984). Controversial issues in emotion theory. In Shaver, P. (ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 5), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 64–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1992). An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure situations. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 31: 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P. A. (1990). Victim attributions and post-rape trauma. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 298–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1998). Measuring the beliefs in a just world. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York, pp. 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., and Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 28: 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garret, J., and Libby, W. L. (1973). Role of intentionality in mediating responses to inequity in the dyad. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 28: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. J. Appl. Psychol. 79: 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L., and Olson, J. M. (1989). Beliefs in a just world and reactions to personal deprivation. J. Pers. 57: 799–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L., and Olson, J. M. (1993). Beliefs in a just world, discontent, and assertive actions by working women. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 19: 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L., and Olson, J. M. (1998). Individual differences in the belief in a just world and responses to personal misfortune. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World, Plenum, New York, pp. 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoff Bulman, R., and Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35: 351–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M., Miller, R. S., Ware, E. E., and Sherk, D. (1981). Locus of control as a modifier of the relationship between stressors and moods. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41: 357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1970). The desire for justice and reactions to victims. In Maccaulay, J., and Berkowitz, L. (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. J. Pers. 45: 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychol. Bull. 85: 1030–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Sommers, D. G. (1992). Employees' reactions to an anticipated plant closure: The influence of positive illusions. In Montada, L., Filipp, S., and Lerner, M. (eds.), Life Crises and Experiences of Loss in Adulthood, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Pers. Ind. Diff. 12: 1171–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkus, I. M., and Bissonnette, V. L. (1996). Relationships among belief in a just world, willingness to accommodate, and marital well-being. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22: 1043–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., and Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22: 666–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1986). The experience of injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phenomenology. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., and Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of casaulity: Fact or fiction? Psychol. Bull. 82: 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1994). Injustice in harm and loss. Soc. Just. Res. 7: 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. M., and Hafer, C. L. (1996). Affect, motivation, and cognition in relative deprivation research. In Sorrentino, R. M., and Higgins, E. T. (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition (Vol. 3), Guilford Press, New York, pp. 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., and Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In Higgins, E. T., and Kruglanski, A. W. (eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 211–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere-specific measures of perceived control. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 1253–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, B., Schneider, A., and Montada, L. (1998). How do observers of victimization preserve their belief in a just world cognitively or actionally? Findings from a longitudinal study. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, C., Benson, D. E., and Snyder, C. (1990). Belief in a just world and depression. Sociolog. Pers. 33: 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery. J. Soc. Iss. 29: 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? J. Soc. Iss. 31: 65–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., and O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52: 1061–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. H., Parrott, W. G., Ozer, D., and Moniz, A. (1994). Subjective injustice and inferiority as predictors of hostile and depressive feelings in envy. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20: 705–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., and Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol. Bull. 103: 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaka, J., and Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 732–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., and Ball, G. A. (1992). The social implications of punishing unethical behavior: Observers' cognitive and affective reactions. J. Management 18: 751–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., and Walster, G. W. (1976). New directions in equity research. In Berkowitz, L., and Walster, E. (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 9), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Gerbasi, K. C., Kravitz, R. I., and Wheeler, I. (1975). The belief in a just world and reactions to innocent victims. JSAS Cat. Sel. Doc. Psychol. 5: 326.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn L. Hafer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hafer, C.L., Correy, B.L. Mediators of the Relation Between Beliefs in a Just World and Emotional Responses to Negative Outcomes. Social Justice Research 12, 189–204 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022144317302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022144317302

Navigation