Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 43–49

A “Thinking Journey” to the Planets Using Scientific Visualization Technologies: Implications to Astronomy Education

Article

Abstract

We present a novel approach to teaching astronomy and planetary sciences, centered on visual images and simulations of planetary objects. The basic idea of the “Thinking Journey” concept is to take the students to other celestial objects as tourists, and to teach science through the observatio of various natural phenomena in these new environments. The power of scientific visualization, through still and dynamic images, makes such a journey an exciting learning experience. The introduction of new technologies (3D animations, virtual reality) greatly enhances the visualization capabilities the teacher can use, allowing him to simulate actual flights over the terrain of other planets and to study them as if observing from a spaceship in orbit. The present program focuses on the study of the Moon and of the planet Mars, by means of observation, interpretation, and comparison to planet Earth. Students learn to recognize geological and atmospheric processes, discuss astronomic phenomena, and discover that the same basic physical laws govern all objects in the solar system.

astronomy education scientific visualization virtual reality “Thinking Journey” 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Squire, K., Barnett, M., Schmidt, R., Karrigan, K., Yamagata-Lynch, L., and Johnson, C. (2001). Virtual solar system project: Learning through a technology-rich, inquiry-based, participatory learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology 9: 7–25.Google Scholar
  2. Bennet, J. O. (1999). Strategies for teaching astronomy. Mercury 28: 24–31.Google Scholar
  3. Bliss, J., and Ogborn, J. (1989). Tools for exploratory learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 5: 37–50.Google Scholar
  4. Comins, N. F. (1993). Misconceptions about astronomy: Their origins. In Novak, J. D. (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Cornell.Google Scholar
  5. DeLaughter, J. E., Stein, S., Stein C. A., and Bain, K. R. (1998). Preconceptions abound among students in an introductory earth science course. EOS 79: 429–431.Google Scholar
  6. Feuerstein, R. (1998). The Human Being as a Changing Entity, Tel-Aviv Broadcasted University. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
  7. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., and Rynders, J. E. (1988). Don't Accept Me as I Am—Helping “Retarded” People to Excel, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Gazit, E., and Chen, D. (2000). “A Virtual Journey through the solar system”: Learning basic astronomical phenomena by using virtual reality technology. A case study (preliminary results). In Proceedings of the 12th Scientific Conference of the Israeli Association for Research on Education, Tel-Aviv, Israel, pp. 303–308. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, J. K., and Reiner, M. (2000). Thought experiments in science education: Potential and current realization. International Journal of Science Education 22: 265–283.Google Scholar
  10. Goforth, D. (1994). Learner control = decision making + information: A model and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 11: 1–26.Google Scholar
  11. Harper, B., Squires, D., and McDougall, A. (2000). Constructivist simulations: A new design paradigm. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9: 115–130.Google Scholar
  12. Lanciano, N. (1999). Teaching and learning astronomy at the elementary school level. In Gouguenheim, L., McNally, D., and Percy J. R. (Eds.), New Trends in Astronomy Teaching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 133–138.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, R., and Hartman, W. K. (1993). The Grand Tour—A Traveler's Guide to the Solar System, Workman Publishing, New York, 208 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Mohler, J. L. (2000). Desktop virtual reality for the enhancement of visualization skills. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9: 151–165.Google Scholar
  15. Nussbaum, J. (1985). The Earth as a cosmic body. In Driver, R., Guesne, E., and Tiberghien, A. (Eds.), Children's Ideas in Science, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Chap. 9Google Scholar
  16. Perrig, W., and Kintsch, W. (1985). Prepositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language 24: 503–518.Google Scholar
  17. Scardamalia, M., Bereuter, C., McLean, R., Swallow, J., and Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research 5: 51–68.Google Scholar
  18. Schur, Y. (1998). A Thinking Journey to the Moon, Ma'alot Press, Jerusalem, 216 pp. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
  19. Schur, Y., Brandt, R., and Yair, Y. (2002). A Thinking Journey to Mars, Center for Educational Technology, Tel Aviv, 155 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Shapiro, C., Whitney, P., Sadler, M., and Schneps, I. (1988). A private Universe [Videotape], Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Science Education Department, Science Media Group.Google Scholar
  21. Yair, Y., Mintz, R., and Litvak, S. (1997). Touch the Sky, Touch the Universe. A Multimedia-Based Astronomy Encyclopedia [CD-ROM], Center for Educational Technology, TelAviv.Google Scholar
  22. Yair, Y., Mintz, R., and Litvak, S. (2001). 3D-virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 20: 293–305.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Projects and Development – SHOAMThe Open University of IsraelTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.The Weizman Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
  3. 3.The Center for Educational TechnologyTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations