Advertisement

The Construction and Development of Theory in the Sexual Offending Area: A Metatheoretical Framework

  • Tony Ward
  • Stephen M. Hudson
Article

Abstract

A major problem in the sexual offending area is the absence of an integrated approach to theory building. The lack of a framework to guide empirical and theoretical research has resulted in the ad hoc proliferation of theories that often overlap, and essentially neglect each others' existence. In this paper we outline a metatheoretical framework that will hopefully address these problems. This framework takes into account a number of different theory construction principles and ideas. It differentiates between different levels of theory, such as comprehensive, middle, and micro-levels, and stresses the importance of distinguishing between distal and proximal causal factors. After briefly describing this metatheory we illustrate its utility and demonstrate how different theories of sexual offending can be meaningfully integrated within this framework. We finish with some recommendations for theoretical development in the sexual offending domain.

attachment theory cognitive theories sexual arousal sexual offending theory construction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., & Guild, D. (1977). The components of rapist's sexual arousal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 895–903.Google Scholar
  2. Alessi, G. (1992). Models of proximate and ultimate causation in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1359–1370.Google Scholar
  3. Davison, G. C., & Neale, J. M. (1996). Abnormal psychology (6th ed.) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Donat, P. L. N., & D'Emilio, J. (1992). A feminist redefinition of rape and sexual assault: Historical foundations and change. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 9–22.Google Scholar
  5. Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, G. C. N., & Hirschman, R. (1991). Towards a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 662–669.Google Scholar
  7. Hooker, C. A. (1987). A realistic theory of science. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  8. Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (1996). Relapse prevention: Future directions. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 249–256.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston, L., & Ward, T. (1996). Social cognition and sexual offending: A theoretical framework. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 55–80.Google Scholar
  10. Kalmar, D. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Theory knitting: An integrative approach to theory development. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 153–170.Google Scholar
  11. Knight, R. A., & Prentky, R. A. (1990). Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 23–52). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  12. Lanyon, R. I. (1991). Theories of sexual offending. In C. R. Hollin & K. Howells (Eds.), Clinical approaches to sex offenders and their victims (pp. 35–54). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Laws, D. R. (1995). A theory of relapse prevention. In W. O'Donohue & L. Krasner (Eds.), Theories of behavior therapy (pp. 445–473). Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  14. MacDonald, R. K., & Pithers, W. D. (1989). Self-monitoring to identify high-risk situations. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sexual offenders (pp. 96–104). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Malamuth, N. M., Heavey, C. L., & Linz, D. (1993). Predicting men's antisocial behavior against women: The interaction model of sexual aggression. In G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, J. R. Graham, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment and treatment (pp. 63–97). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  16. Marshall, W. L. (1989). Invited essay: Intimacy, loneliness & sexual offenders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 491–503.Google Scholar
  17. Marshall, W. L. (1996). Assessment, treatment, and theorizing about sex offenders: Developments over the past 20 years and future directions. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 23, 162–199.Google Scholar
  18. Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1989). Sexual violence. In K. Howells & C. R. Hollin (Eds.), Clinical approaches to violence (pp. 205–246). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 257–275). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  20. Marshall, W. L., Hudson, S. M., Jones, R., & Fernandez, Y. M. (1995). Empathy in sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 99–113.Google Scholar
  21. Pithers, W. D. (1990). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressors: A method for maintaining therapeutic gains and enhancing external supervision. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 343–362). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  22. Pithers, W. D., Beal, L. S., Armstrong, J., & Petty, J. (1989). Identification of risk factors through clinical interviews and analysis of records. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 77–87). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Schwartz, B. K. (1995). Theories of sexual offenses. In B. K. Schwartz & H. R. Cellini (Eds.), The sex offender: Corrections, treatment and legal practice (pp. 1–32). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Ward, T., & Haig, B. D. (1997). Abductive reasoning and clinical assessment. Australian Psychologist, 32, 93–100.Google Scholar
  25. Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1996). Attachment style in sex offenders: A preliminary study. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 17–26.Google Scholar
  26. Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Marshall, W. L., & Siegert, R. J. (1995). Attachment style and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework. Sexual abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 317–335.Google Scholar
  27. Ward, T., Louden, K., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1995). A descriptive model of the offense chain for child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 452–472.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tony Ward
    • 1
  • Stephen M. Hudson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations