Political Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 265–282 | Cite as

Conflict Avoidance and Political Participation

  • Stacy G. Ulbig
  • Carolyn L. Funk


Previous explanations of mass participation have often focused on sociodemographic characteristics to the neglect of social psychological factors. This study takes a new path in thinking about the role of psychological factors in participation. Specifically, we hypothesize that individual propensities regarding conflict will influence the likelihood of participating in political affairs. We develop more specific expectations for how the avenue of participation interacts with individual propensities toward conflict to influence participation. Using secondary analysis of the Citizen Participation Study (CPS), we show that conflict avoidance is significantly and inversely related to participation in some kinds of activities, consistent with our expectations. Thus, both individual propensities and the political context influence participation. This study provides a new understanding of which individuals participate in political affairs and which avenues they choose. This suggests a need to reconsider the role of psychological factors in models of participation.


Secondary Analysis Psychological Factor Sociodemographic Characteristic Political Participation Participation Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Berscheid, Ellen (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Brady, David W., and Sean M. Theriault (1998). A reassessment of who's to blame: a positive case for the public evaluation of Congress. Paper presented at the Hendricks Symposium on Public Disaffection with the U.S. Political System, October 9–10, 1998, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, Steven D. (1982). The explanation of particularized contacting: a comparison of models. Urban Affairs Quarterly 18(2): 217–234.Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, Donn. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cappella, Joseph N., and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (1997). Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Conway, M. Margaret (1991). Political Participation in the United States. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, Roger H., David M. Kovenock, and Michael O'Leary (1968). Congress in Crisis: Politics and Congressional Reform. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  10. Durr, Robert H., John B. Gilmour, and Christina Wolbrecht (1997). Explaining congressional approval. American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 175–207.Google Scholar
  11. Eagly, Alice H., and Shelly Chaiken (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. New York: HBJ.Google Scholar
  12. Elving, Ronald D. (1994). Brighter lights, wider windows: presenting Congress in the 1990s. In T. E. Mann and N. J. Ornstein (eds.), Congress, the Press, and the Public. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  13. Fallows, James (1996). Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  14. Funk, Carolyn L. (1998). Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: public views of debate in the political system. Paper presented at the Hendricks Symposium on Public Disaffection with the U.S. Political System, October 9–10, 1998, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
  15. Glynn, Carroll J., Andrew F. Hayes, and James Shanahan (1997). Perceived support for one's opinions and willingness to speak out: a meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61(3): 452–463.Google Scholar
  16. Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse (1995). Congress as Public Enemy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hill, Kim Quaile, and Jan E. Leighley (1996). Political parties and class mobilization in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 787–804.Google Scholar
  18. Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague (1987). Networks in context: the social flow of political information. American Political Science Review 81(4): 1197–1216.Google Scholar
  19. Jankowski, Thomas B., and John M. Strate (1995). Modes of participation over the adult life span. Political Behavior 17(1): 89–106.Google Scholar
  20. Leighley, Jan E. (1995). Attitudes, opportunities and incentives: a field essay on political participation. Political Research Quarterly 48(1): 181–209.Google Scholar
  21. Leighley, Jan E. (1996). Group membership and the mobilization of political participation. Journal of Politics 58(2): 447–463.Google Scholar
  22. Lipset, Seymour M. (1981). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mansbridge, Jane J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Maslach, Christina, R. T. Santee, and C. Wade (1987). Individuation, gender role, and dissent: personality mediators of situational forces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(6): 1088–1093.Google Scholar
  25. Milbrath, Lester (1965). Political Participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  26. Mladenka, Kenneth R. (1977). Citizen demand and bureaucratic response: direct dialing democracy in a major American city. Urban Affairs Quarterly 12(3): 273–290.Google Scholar
  27. Nie, Norman, Jane Junn, and Kenneth Stehlik-Barry (1996). Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth (1993). The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion—Our Social Skin, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Pennock, James R. (1979). Democratic Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: Em. C. Brown.Google Scholar
  31. Ragsdale, Lyn, and Jerrold G. Rusk (1993). Who are nonvoters? Profiles from the 1990 Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 721–746.Google Scholar
  32. Rosenberg, Morris (1954–55). Some determinants of political apathy. Public Opinion Quarterly 18(4): 349–366.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenstone, Steven, and John M. Hansen (1993). Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Sanders, Lynn M. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory 25(3): 347–376.Google Scholar
  35. Schudson, Michael (1998). The Good Citizen. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Snyder, Mark (1987). Public Appearances/Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  37. Tannen, Deborah (1998). The Argument Culture. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  38. Uslaner, Eric M. (1993). The Decline of Comity in Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  39. Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie (1972). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  40. Verba, Sidney, Kay L. Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Whitney, Kristina, L. M. Sagrestano, and Christina Maslach (1994). Establishing the social impact of individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(6): 1140–1153.Google Scholar
  42. Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Steven J. Rosenstone (1980). Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stacy G. Ulbig
    • 1
  • Carolyn L. Funk
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceRice UniversityHouston
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceRice UniversityHouston

Personalised recommendations