Contemporary Family Therapy

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 331–351 | Cite as

Self-of-the-Therapist Work: A Balance Between Removing Restraints and Identifying Resources

  • Tina M. Timm
  • Adrian J. Blow
Article

Abstract

The authors propose that self-of-the-therapist work is most productive when therapists and supervisors approach family of origin issues and historical life events in a balanced way and suggest that they move to an approach that ideally liberates restraints posed by self-of-the-therapist issues, while at the same time accesses resources available to therapists because of the same issues. This is a shift from the primarily restraint focus that has dominated self-of-the-therapist work. This paper also provides personal experiences of the authors, guidelines on how to create safety and balance, as well as practical examples of self-of-the-therapist exercises.

self-of-the-therapist family-of-origin supervision therapy competency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Andolfi, M. & Menghi, P. (1980). A model for training in family therapy. In M. Andolfi & I. Zwering (Eds.), Dimensions of family therapy (pp. 239–260). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aponte, H. (1994). How personal can training get? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20, 3–15.Google Scholar
  3. Auld, F., & Hyman, M. (1991). Resolution of inner conflict: An introduction to psychoanalytic therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Bachelor, A., & Horvath, A. O. (1998, in press). The therapeutic relationship. In M. A. Hubbel, B. L. Duncan, and S. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: Common factors in effective psychotherapy, medicine, and human services (pp. 133–178). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, D. F., & Jones, M. A. (1973). Progress on family problems: a nationwide study of clients' and counselors' views on family agency services. New York: Family Service Association of America.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  7. Braverman, S. (1984). Family of origin as a training resource for family therapist. In C. Munson (Ed.), Family of origin applications in clinical supervision (pp. 37–48). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  8. Braverman, S. (1997). The use of genograms in supervision. In T. Todd & C. Storm (Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor: Context, philosophy, and pragmatics (pp. 156–172). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. de Shazer, S. (1985). Keys to solution in brief therapy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Fine, M. (1992). Family therapy training: Part 2—Hypothesizing and story telling. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 3, 61–79.Google Scholar
  11. Guerin, P., & Fogarty, T. (1972). Study your own family. In A. Ferber, M. Mendelsohn, & A. Napier (Eds.), The book of family therapy (pp. 445–467). New York: Science House.Google Scholar
  12. Haley, J. (1976). Problem solving therapy: New strategies for effective psychotherapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Kelly, G. (1990). The cultural family of origin: A description of a training strategy. Counselor Education and Supervision, 30, 77–84.Google Scholar
  14. Liddle, H., & Saba, G. (1982). Teaching family therapy at the introductory level: A model emphasizing a pattern which connects training and therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 63–72.Google Scholar
  15. Marek, L. I., Sandifer, D. M., Beach, A., Coward, R. L., & Protinsky, H. O. (1994). Supervision without the problem: A model of solution-focused supervision. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 5, 57–64.Google Scholar
  16. McDaniel, S. & Landau-Stanton, J. (1991). Family-of-origin work and family therapy skills training: Both-and. Family Process, 30, 459–471.Google Scholar
  17. McGoldrick, M. (1982). Through the looking glass: Supervision of a trainee's “trigger” family. In R. Wiffen & J. Byng-Hall (Eds.), Family therapy supervision (pp. 17–37). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. McGoldrick, M., & Gerson, R. (1985). Genograms in family assessment. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Minuchin, S., & Fishman. H. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Napier, A. Y., & Whitaker, C. (1978). The family crucible: The intense experience of family therapy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  21. Scharff, D. (1992). Refinding the object and reclaiming the self. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  22. Schwartz, R. (1995). Internal family systems. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Selekman, M. D., & Todd, T. C. (1995). Co-creating a context for change in the supervisory system: The solution-focused supervision model. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 14, 21–33.Google Scholar
  24. Wells, V., Scott, R., Schmeller, L., & Hillman, J. (1990). The family-of-origin framework: A model for clinical training. Journal of Contemporary Psychiatry, 20, 223–235.Google Scholar
  25. Wetchler, J. L. (1990). Solution-focused supervision. Family Therapy, 17, 129–138.Google Scholar
  26. White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tina M. Timm
    • 1
  • Adrian J. Blow
    • 2
  1. 1.Saint Louis UniversitySt
  2. 2.Department of Counseling and Family TherapySaint Louis UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations