Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 13, Issue 10, pp 883–893 | Cite as

Postmenopausal breast cancer is associated with high intakes of ω6 fatty acids (Sweden)

  • Elisabet Wirfält
  • Irene Mattisson
  • Bo Gullberg
  • Ulla Johansson
  • Håkan Olsson
  • Göran Berglund
Article

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the postmenopausal breast cancer risk associated with total fat intake, different types and relative proportions of dietary fat using a nested, matched case–control study within the Malmö Diet and Cancer (MDC) cohort, Sweden. Methods: Among women 50 years or older at baseline (n = 12,803), incident breast cancer cases (n = 237) were matched to controls (n = 673) on age and screening date. Data were obtained by a “novel” diet history method, a structured questionnaire, and anthropometric measurements. Conditional logistic regression examined breast cancer risks associated with quintiles of fat intake residuals adjusted for energy and potential confounders. Results: Saturated fat and the ω3–ω6 fatty acid ratio were not related to increased risks, but positive trends were seen for total (p = 0.031), monounsaturated (p = 0.002), and polyunsaturated fat (p = 0.0009), especially ω6 fatty acids and the polyunsaturated–saturated fat ratio (p = 0.004). With mutual adjustment for different types of fat, an elevated risk remained significant in the highest ω6 fatty acid quintile (RR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.08–4.01). Conclusions: Postmenopausal breast cancer was positively associated with total, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fat. However, with mutual adjustment for other types of fat, specifically high intakes of ω6 fatty acids were associated with an increased risk.

diet fatty acids postmenopausal breast cancer prospective study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rose DP (1997) Effects of dietary fatty acids on breast and prostate cancers: evidence from in vitro experiments and animal studies. Am J Clin Nutr 66: 1513–1522S.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cave WT (1996) Dietary omega-3polyunsat urated fats and breast cancer. Nutrition 12: S39–S42.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ip C (1997) Review of the effects of trans fatty acids, oleic acid, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, and conjugated linoleic acid on mammary carcinogenesis in animals. Am J Clin Nutr 66(Suppl.): 1523S-1529S.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fay M, Freedman L, Clifford C, Midthune D (1997) Effect of different types and amounts of fat on the development of mammary tumors in rodents: a review. Cancer Res 57: 3979–3988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Willett WC (2001) Diet and breast cancer. J Intern Med 249: 395–411.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kushi LH, Sellers TA, Potter JD, et al. (1992) Dietary fat and postmenopausal breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 1092–1099.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wolk A, Bergström R, Hunter D, et al. (1998) A prospective study of association of monounsaturated fat and other types of fat with risk of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 158: 41–45.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kohlmeier L (1997) Biomarkers of fatty acid exposure and breast cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 66(Suppl.): 1548–1556S.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman LS, et al. (2001) Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications. Am J Epidemiol 153: 394–403.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wong MY, Day NE, Wareham NJ (1999) Measurement error in epidemiology: the design of validation studies. II: Bivariate situation. Stat Med 18: 2831–2845.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berglund G, Elmsta? hl S, Janzon L, Larsson SA (1993) The MalmöDiet and Cancer Study: design and feasibility. J Intern Med 233: 45–51.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willett W (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics Vol. 30, pp. 101–147.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manjer J, Carlsson S, Elmsta? hl S, et al. (2001) The MalmöDiet and Cancer Study: representativity, cancer incidence and mortality in participants and non-participants. Eur J Cancer Prev 10: 489–499.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morabia A, Flandre P (1992) Misclassification bias related to definition of menopausal status in case-control studies of breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol 21: 222–228.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elmsta? hl S, Gullberg B, Riboli E, Saracci R, Lindgärde F (1996) The Malmöfood study: the reproducibility of a novel diet history method and an extensive food frequency questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr 50: 134–142.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riboli E, Elmsta? hl S, Saracci R, Gullberg B, Lindgärde F (1997) The MalmöFood Study: validity of two dietary assessment methods for measuring nutrient intake. Int J Epidemiol 26: S161–S173.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    WCRF/AICR (JD Potter) (1997) Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. Washington, DC: World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb S A, et al. (1991) Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify underrecording. Eur J Clin Nutr 45: 569–581.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Black AE, Goldberg GR, Jebb SA, Livingstone MBE, Cole TJ, Prentice AM (1991) Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 45: 583–599.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) Energy and Protein Requirements Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization. Technical Report Series.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wirfält E, Hedblad B, Gullberg B, et al. (2001) Food patterns and components of the metabolic syndrome in men and women. A cross-sectional study within the MalmöDiet and cancer cohort. Am J Epidemiol 154: 1150–1159.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merlo J, Berglund G, Wirfält E, et al. (2000) Self-administered questionnaire is a simple and valid method compared to a personal diary for assessment of current exposure to hormone therapy-an analysis of 16060 women. Am J Epidemiol 152: 788–792.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelsey JL (1993) Breast cancer epidemiology: summary and future directions. Epidemiol Rev 15: 256–263.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boyd NF, Martin M, Noffel GA, Lockwood GA, Trichler DL (1993) A meta-analysis of studies of dietary fat and breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 68: 627–636.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trichopoulou A, Katsouyanni K, Stuver S, et al. (1995) Consumption of olive oil and specific food groups in relation to breast cancer risk in Greece. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 110–116.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gaard M, Tretli S, Loeken EB (1995) Dietary fat and the risk of breast cancer: a prospective study of 25,892 Norweigian women. Int J Cancer 63: 13–17.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Board of Health and Social Welfare/National Food Administration (1986) Foods-characteristics, handling etc [Livsmedel-egenskaper, hantering mm]. In: Wennström G, Bruce Å, Lindvall I, Sjölin S, Lindvall C, eds. Diet, Physical Activity and Health [Kost, motion och hälsa]. Stockholm: Liber/Allmä nna Förlaget, pp. 125–166.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lands W (1992) Biochemistry and physiology of n-3FAs. FASEB J 6: 2530–2536.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    FAO/WHO (1994) Fats and Oils in Human Nutrition. Report of a joint expert consultation, no 57. Food and Agricultural Organi-892 E. Wirfält et al. zation of the United Nations and the World Health Organization. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Okuyama H, Kobayashi T, Watanabe S (1997) Dietary fatty acids-the N-6/N-3balance and chronic elderly diseases. Excess linoleic acid and relative N-3deficiency syndrome seen in Japan. Prog Lipid Res 35: 409–457.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Holmes M, Hunter D, Colditz G, et al. (1999) Association of dietary intake of fat and fatty acids with risk of breast cancer. JAMA 281: 914–920.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Velie E, Kulldorff M, Schairer C, Block G, Albanes D, Schatzkin A (2000) Dietary fat, fat subtypes, and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. J Nat Cancer Inst 92: 833–839.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smith-Warner S, Spiegelman D, Adami H-O, et al. (2001) Types of dietary fat and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer 92: 767–774.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith AF (1991) Cognitive processes in long-term dietary recall. Vital Health Stat 6(4).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK (1987) Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236: 157–161.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tourangeau R (1984) Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In: Jabin TB, Straf ML, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R, eds. Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 73–100.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Elmsta? hl S, Gullberg B (1997) Bias in diet assessment methods-consequences of collinearity and measurement errors on power and observed relative risks. Int J Epidemiol 26: 1071–1079.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prentice RL (1996) Measurement error and results from analytic epidemiology: dietary fat and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1738–1747.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. (1998) Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. JAMA 279: 535–540.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bartsch H (1999) Exocyclic adducts as new risk markers for DNA damage in man. In: Singer B, Bartsch H, eds. DNA Cyclic Adducts, No. 150. Lyon, France: International Agency for Cancer Research, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nair J, Vaca CE, Velic I, Mutanen M, Valsta LM, Bartsch H (1997) High dietary w-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids drastically increase the formation of etheno-DNA base adducts in white blood cells of female subjects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6: 597–601.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jenkinson A, Collins A, Duthie S, Wahle K, Duthie G (1999) The effect of increased intakes of polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E on DNA damage in human lymphocytes. FASEB J 13: 2138–2142.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Trichopoulou A, Vasilopoulou E, Hollman P, et al. (2000) Nutritional composition and flavonoid content of edible wild greens and green pies: a potential rich source of antioxidant nutrients in the Mediterranean diet. Food Chem 70: 319–323.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Messina MJ, Persky V, Setchell KDR, Barnes S (1994) Soy intake and cancer risk: a review of the in vitro and in vivo data. Nutr Cancer 21: 113–131.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thompson L, Robb P, Serraino M, Cheung F (1991) Mammalian lignan production from various foods. Nutr Cancer 16: 43–52.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Adlercreutz H (1995) Phytoestrogens: epidemiology and a possible role in cancer protection. Environ Health Perspect 103: 103–112.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Storlien LH, Baur LA, Kriketos AD, et al. (1996) Dietary fats and insulin action. Diabetologia 39: 621–631.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vessby B (2000) Dietary fat and insulin action in humans. Br J Nutr 83(Suppl. 1): S91–S96.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kaaks R (1996) Nutrition, hormones and breast cancer: is insulin the missing link? Cancer Causes Control 7: 605–625.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chajès V, Hulte´ n K, Van Kappel AL, et al. (1999) Fatty-acid composition in serum phospholipids and risk of breast cancer: an incident case-control study in Sweden. Int J Cancer 83: 585–590.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pala V, Krogh V, Muti P, et al. (2001) Erythrocyte membrane fatty acids and subsequent breast cancer: a prospective Italian study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 1088–1095.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabet Wirfält
    • 1
    • 2
  • Irene Mattisson
    • 1
  • Bo Gullberg
    • 3
  • Ulla Johansson
    • 1
  • Håkan Olsson
    • 4
  • Göran Berglund
    • 1
  1. 1.Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, Department of Medicine, Surgery and OrthopedicsLund UniversitySweden
  2. 2.Malmö Diet and Cancer StudyUMASMalmöSweden
  3. 3.Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, Department of Community MedicineLund UniversitySweden
  4. 4.Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, Department of OncologyLund UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations