A macro study of self-citation
This study investigates the role of self-citation in the scientific production of Norway (1981-1996). More than 45,000 publications have been analysed. Using a three-year citation window we find that 36% of all citations represent author self-citations. However, this percentage is decreasing when citations are traced for longer periods. We find the highest share of self-citation among the least cited papers. There is a strong positive correlation between the number of self-citations and the number of authors of the publications. Still, only a minor part of the overall increase in citation rates that can be found for multi-authored papers is due to self-citations. Also, the share of self-citation shows significant variations among different scientific disciplines. The results are relevant for the discussion concerning use of citation indicators in research assessments.
KeywordsCitation Rate Scientific Impact Citation Window Citation Indicator Citation Period
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.P. O. Seglen, Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality, Allergy, 52 (1997) 1050–1056.Google Scholar
- 5.L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1990, p. 220.Google Scholar
- 8.S. Bonzi, H. W. Snyder, Patterns of self citation across fields of inquiry, Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 27 (1990) 204–207.Google Scholar
- 10.T. N. van Leeuwen, E. J. Rinia, A. F. J. van Raan, Bibliometric Profiles of Academic Physics Research in the Netherlands. Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS 96–09, Leiden, 1996.Google Scholar
- 11.H. F. Moed, J. G. M. van der Velde, Bibliometric Profiles of Academic Chemistry Research in the Netherlands, Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS-93–08, Leiden, 1993.Google Scholar
- 15.E. Garfield, Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979, p. 245.Google Scholar
- 17.E. Garfield, A. Welljams-Dorof, Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making, Science and Public Policy, 19 (1992) 321–327.Google Scholar