, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 235–246 | Cite as

A macro study of self-citation

  • Dag W. Aksnes


This study investigates the role of self-citation in the scientific production of Norway (1981-1996). More than 45,000 publications have been analysed. Using a three-year citation window we find that 36% of all citations represent author self-citations. However, this percentage is decreasing when citations are traced for longer periods. We find the highest share of self-citation among the least cited papers. There is a strong positive correlation between the number of self-citations and the number of authors of the publications. Still, only a minor part of the overall increase in citation rates that can be found for multi-authored papers is due to self-citations. Also, the share of self-citation shows significant variations among different scientific disciplines. The results are relevant for the discussion concerning use of citation indicators in research assessments.


Citation Rate Scientific Impact Citation Window Citation Indicator Citation Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    T. J. Phelan, A compendium of issues for citation analysis, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. M. Lawani, On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33 (1982) 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. O. Seglen, Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality, Allergy, 52 (1997) 1050–1056.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. H. Macroberts, B. R. Macroberts, Problems of citation analysis: A critical review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (1989) 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1990, p. 220.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Garfield, Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?, Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Tagliacozzo, Self-citation in scientific literature, Journal of Documentation, 33 (1977) 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Bonzi, H. W. Snyder, Patterns of self citation across fields of inquiry, Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting, 27 (1990) 204–207.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Snyder, S. Bonzi, Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980–1989), Journal of Information Science, 24 (1998) 432–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. N. van Leeuwen, E. J. Rinia, A. F. J. van Raan, Bibliometric Profiles of Academic Physics Research in the Netherlands. Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS 96–09, Leiden, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. F. Moed, J. G. M. van der Velde, Bibliometric Profiles of Academic Chemistry Research in the Netherlands, Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS-93–08, Leiden, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. J. Nederhof, R. F. Meijer, H. F. Moed, A. F. J. van Raan, Research performance indicators for university departments: A study of an agricultural university, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Herbertz, Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. F. J. van Raan, The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results, Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Garfield, Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979, p. 245.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Bonzi, H. W. Snyder, Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others, Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Garfield, A. Welljams-Dorof, Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making, Science and Public Policy, 19 (1992) 321–327.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers/Akadémiai Kiadó 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dag W. Aksnes
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education (NIFU)OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations