Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 167–179 | Cite as

Factors Associated with Very Early Weaning Among Primiparas Intending to Breastfeed

  • Melissa Avery
  • Laura Duckett
  • Joan Dodgson
  • Kay Savik
  • Susan J. Henly
Article

Abstract

Objectives: The major objective of this study was to identify predictor variables that accurately differentiated breastfeeding women who weaned during the first 4 weeks, those who weaned between 5 and 26 weeks, and those who weaned after 26 weeks. Predictors were demographic variables, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) variables, breastfeeding knowledge, and difficulties experienced during the first month. Methods: Primiparas who delivered healthy infants in an urban midwestern hospital provided initial data prior to discharge. Follow-up occurred at 1,3,6,9, and 12 months. Following appropriate bivariate analyses, polychotomous logistic regression was used to determine predictors of weaning group. Linear multiple regression was used to predict intended duration. Results: Most of the 84 women who weaned very early had intended to breastfeed considerably longer. According to the multivariate analysis, women who weaned earlier were younger, had completed fewer years of education, had a more positive bottle-feeding attitude and a less positive breastfeeding attitude, intended to breastfeed less time, had lower knowledge scores, had higher perceived insufficient milk scores, and planned to work outside the home. Variables postulated by the TPB to be direct predictors of intention explained 36% of the variance in intended duration. Conclusions: Women at risk for early weaning can be identified with reasonable accuracy using a TPB-based conceptual framework expanded to include breastfeeding specific variables. Casefinding using empirically derived screening methods and careful postpartum follow-up, along with professional intervention, should be used to avert unintended early weaning.

Breastfeeding early weaning Theory of Planned Behavior knowledge insufficient milk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    American Academy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 1997;100(6):1035–1039.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Academy of Pediatrics. Infant feeding practices and their possible relationship to the etiology of diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics 1994;94(5):77–80.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lawrence RA. A review of the medical benefits and contraindications to breastfeeding in the United States. Washington, DC: Maternal & Child Health Bureau, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newman J. How breast milk protects newborns. Scient Amer 1995;273(6):76.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ross Products Division. Updated breast-feeding trend through 1997, Mothers Survey. (Available from Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, 625 Cleveland Avenue, Columbus, Ohio, 43215–1724, 614–624–7677.), 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Healthy people 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: DHHS, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coreil J, Murphy JE. Maternal commitment, lactation practices, and breastfeeding duration. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 1988;July/August:273–278.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quarles A, Williams PD, Hoyle DA, Brimeyer M, Williams AR. Mothers' intention, age, education and the duration and management of breastfeeding. Matern Child Nurs J 1994;22(3):102–108.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janke JR. Development of the breast-feeding attrition prediction tool. Nurs Res 1994;43(2):100–104.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryant C. The impact of kin, friend and neighbor networks on infant feeding practices. Soc Sci Med 1982;16:1757–1765.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bryant C, Coriel J, D'Angelo S, Baily D, Lazarov M. A strategy for promoting breastfeeding among economically disadvantaged women and adolescents. NAACOG's Clin Iss Perinat Women Health Nurs 1992;3(4):723–730.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O'Campo P, Faden RR, Gielen R, Gielen AC, Wang MC. Prenatal factors associated with breastfeeding duration: Recommendations for prenatal interventions. Birth 1992;19(4):195–201.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buxton KE, Gielen AC, Faden RR, Brown CH, Paige DM, Chwalow AJ. Women intending to breastfeed: Predictors of early infant feeding experience. Amer J Prev Med 1991;7(2):101–106.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rogers CS, Morris S, Taper LJ. Weaning from the breast: Influences on maternal decisions. Ped Nurs 1987;13(5):341–345.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hill PD. Insufficient milk supply syndrome. NAACOG's Clin Iss Perin Women Health Nurs 1992;3(4):605–612.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hill PD, Aldag JC. Insufficient milk supply among black and white breast-feeding mothers. Res Nurs Health 1993;16:203–211.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ford K, Labbok M. Who is breastfeeding? Implications of associated social and biomedical variables for research on the consequences of method of infant feeding. Amer J Clin Nut 1990;52(3):451–456.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ryan AS. The resurgence of breastfeeding in the United States. Pediatrics 1997;99(4):e12.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Piper S, Parks PL. Predicting the duration of lactation: Evidence from a national survey. Birth 1996;23(1):7–12.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Visness CM, Kennedy KI. Maternal employment and breast-feeding: Findings from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. Amer J Pub Health 1997;87(6):945–950.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duckett L. Maternal employment and breastfeeding. NAACOG's Clin Iss Perin Women Health Nurs 1992;3(4):701–712.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anlar Y, Anlar B, Tonyali A. Some factors influencing the time of lactation. J Trop Ped 1988;34:198–203.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hill PD. Predictors of breast-feeding duration among WIC and non-WIC mothers. Pub Health Nurs 1991;8(1):46–51.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hill PD, Humenick SS, Brennan ML, Woolley D. Does early supplementation affect long-term breastfeeding? Clin Ped 1997;36(6):345–350.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mulford C. Swimming upstream: Breastfeeding care in a non-breastfeeding culture. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 1995;24(5):464–474.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Duckett L, Henly SJ, Garvis M: Predicting breast-feeding duration during the postpartum hospitalization. West J Nurs Res 1993;15(2):177–198.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dettwyler KA. Beauty and the breast: The cultural context of breastfeeding in the United States. In: Stuart-Macadam P, Dettwyler KA, eds. Breastfeeding: Biocultural Perspectives. New York: Aldine de Grutter, 1995Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dodgson J, Duckett L. Breastfeeding in the workplace: Building a support program for nursing mothers. Am Assoc Occupa Health Nurses J 1997;45(6):290–298.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ajzen I, Madden TJ. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exper Soc Psych 1986;22:453–474.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Phillippines: Addison-Wesley, 1975.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manstead A, Proffitt C, Smart J. Attitudes and social cognition. J Person Soc Psych 1983;44(4):657–671.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Manstead A, Plevin C, Smart J. Predicting mothers' choice of infant feeding method. Brit J Soc Psych 1984;23:223–231.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Janke JR. Prediction of breast-feeding attrition: Instrument development. Appl Nurs Res 1992;5(1):48–53.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Duckett L, Henly S, Avery M, et al. A theory of planned behavior-based structural model for breastfeeding. Nurs Res 1998;47(6):325–336.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Duckett L. Breastfeeding behaviors: Testing a structural model. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institute of Health, 1994.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gielen AC, Faden RR, O'Campo P, Brown C, Paige DM. Maternal employment during the early postpartum period: Effects on initiation and continuation of breast-feeding. Pediatrics 1991;87:298–305.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kurinij N, Chain PH, Ezrine SF, Rhoads GG. Does maternal employment affect breast feeding? Amer J Pub Health 1989;79(9):1247–1250.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Norusis MJ. SPSS for Windows: Base System User's Guide Release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS, 1993.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    SAS Institute. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements. Cary, NC: Author, 1996.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bryant CA. Empowering women to breastfeed. Int J Childbirth Ed 1993;8(2):13–15.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bryant C, Lazarov M, Light R, Bailey D, Coreil J, D'Angelo SL. Best Start: Breastfeeding for healthy mothers, healthy babies—a new model for breastfeeding promotion. J Tenn Med Assoc 1989;82(12):642–643.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Walker M. Management of selected early breastfeeding problems seen in clinical practice. Birth 1989;16(3):148–158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa Avery
    • 1
  • Laura Duckett
    • 2
  • Joan Dodgson
    • 3
  • Kay Savik
    • 4
  • Susan J. Henly
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Minnesota, 6101 Weaver-Densford HallMinneapolis
  2. 2.School of NursingUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis
  3. 3.School of NursingUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis
  4. 4.Schools of Nursing and MedicineUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis
  5. 5.College of NursingUniversity of North DakotaGrand Forks

Personalised recommendations