Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 71–85

Factors related to tree growth across urban-rural gradients in the Midwest, USA

  • Valasia Iakovoglou
  • Janette Thompson
  • Lee Burras
  • Rebecca Kipper


Several environmental factors influence tree growth at any site. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between biotic and abiotic factors and tree growth rate (mean ring width averaged over the last 10 years) in settings ranging from urban to rural. Six “clusters”, each with five communities and two rural parks, were sampled in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, for a total sample of 320 trees. Within each community, trees in parks, and along residential and commercial streets were sampled. Five species were sampled: silver maple (Acer saccharinum L.), honeylocust, (Gleditisia triacanthos L.), hackberry (Celtis occidentalis L.), black maple (Acer nigrum Michx F.), and basswood (Tilia americana L.). Factors were investigated for three scenarios: (i) all trees sampled in all clusters, (ii) a single species, all clusters, and (iii) all species, a single cluster.

Baseline variables (cluster, place population, site, species, and age) accounted for 49–71% of observed variation in growth rate. Combined biotic factors accounted for 5 to 6% of observed variation. For all species in a single cluster, combined abiotic factors accounted for 11% of observed variation. Biotic factors related to growth rate detected using multivariate analyses included number of other trees within 9 m, presence of disease and insects, and human-induced mechanical injury. Abiotic factors that were related to tree growth included presence of pavement and core bulk density. For trees in rural parks, number of other trees within 20 m, and for trees in both rural and community parks, number of other trees within 9 m of sample trees were associated with decreased growth rate.

urban-rural gradient urban soil land use increment core analysis street trees abiotic factors biotic factors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astrid, P. and Eckstein, D. (1988) Roadside trees in Hamburg-their present situation of environmental stress and their future chance for recovery. Arboric. J. 12, 109-117.Google Scholar
  2. Berrang, P., Karnosky, D.F. and Stanton, B.J. (1985) Environmental factors affecting tree health in New York. J. Arboric. 11, 185-189.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H. (1986) Core method. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1—Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn. (A. Klute, ed.), pp. 363-376. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  4. Close, R.E., Nguyen, P.V. and Kielbaso, J.J. (1996) Urban vs. natural sugar maple growth: stress symptoms and phenology in relation to site characteristics. J. Arboric. 22, 144-150.Google Scholar
  5. Cook, E.R. (1987) The decomposition of tree-ring series for environmental studies. Tree Ring Bulletin 47, 37-59.Google Scholar
  6. Craul, P.J. (1985) A description of urban soils and their desired characteristics. J. Arboric. 11, 46-55.Google Scholar
  7. Dyer, S.M. and Mader, D.L. (1986) Declined urban sugar maples: growth patterns, nutritional status and site factors. J. Arboric. 12, 6-13.Google Scholar
  8. Fostad, O. and Petersen, P.A. (1997) Vitality, variation, and causes of decline of trees in Oslo center (Norway). J. Arboric. 23, 155-165.Google Scholar
  9. Halverson, H.A. and Rowntree, R.A. (1986) Correlations between urban tree crown cover and total population in eight U.S. cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 13, 219-223.Google Scholar
  10. Iakovoglou, V. (2001) Trees examined along a rural-urban gradient and by local land use in the Midwest U.S.: an investigation of factors related to tree growth. M.S. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  11. Iakovoglou, V., Thompson, J. and Burras, L. (2002) Characteristics of trees according to community population level and by land use in the U.S. Midwest. J. Arboric. 28, 59-69.Google Scholar
  12. Kjelgren, R.K. and Clark, J.R. (1992) Microclimates and tree growth in three urban spaces. J. Environ. Hort. 10, 139-145.Google Scholar
  13. Mallett, K.I. and Volney, W.J.A. (1999) The effect of Armillaria root disease on lodgepole pine tree growth. Can. J. For. 29, 252-259.Google Scholar
  14. McPherson, E.G. and Rowntree, R.A. (1989) Using structural measures to compare twenty-two U.S. street tree populations. Landscape J. 8, 13-23.Google Scholar
  15. Nowak, D.J. and McBride, J.R. (1991) Comparison of Monterey pine stress in urban and natural forests. J. Environ. Management 32, 383-395.Google Scholar
  16. Nowak, D.J., Rowntree, R.A., McPherson, E.G., Sisinni, S.M., Kerkmann, E.R. and Stevens, J.C. (1996) Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landscape and Urban Planning 36, 49-57.Google Scholar
  17. Phipps, R.L. (1985) Collecting, Preparing, Crossdating, and Measuring Tree Increment Cores. Water Resource Investigation Report 85-4148. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  18. Pouyat, R.V., McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1995) Soil characteristics of oak stands along an urban-rural land-use gradient. J. Environ. Qual. 24, 516-526.Google Scholar
  19. Preston, R.J., Jr. (1989) North American Trees, 4th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  20. Rhoades, J.D. (1996) Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3—Chemical Methods (D. Sparks and A. Page, eds.), pp. 417-436. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  21. Rhoades, R.W. and Stipes, R.J. (1999) Growth of trees on the Virginia Tech campus in response to various factors. J. Arboric. 25, 211-215.Google Scholar
  22. Richards, N.A. (1992) Optimum stocking of urban trees. J. Arboric. 18, 64-68.Google Scholar
  23. Ruark, G.A., Mader, D.L., Veneman, P.L.M. and Tattar, T.A. (1983) Soil factors related to urban sugar maple decline. J. Arboric. 9, 1-6.Google Scholar
  24. SAS Institute, Inc. (1996) SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.12, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  25. Thomas, G.W. (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3—Chemical Methods (D. Sparks and A. Page, eds.), pp. 475-490. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  26. Vrecenak, A.J., Vodak, M.C. and Fleming, L.E. (1989) The influence of site factors on the growth of urban trees. J. Arboric. 15, 206-209.Google Scholar
  27. Whitlow, T.H. and Bassuk, N.L. (1987) Trees in difficult sites. J. Arboric. 13, 10-17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valasia Iakovoglou
    • 1
  • Janette Thompson
    • 1
  • Lee Burras
    • 2
  • Rebecca Kipper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource Ecology and ManagementIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy, t[1126 Agronomy HallIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations