Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Treatment- and Cost-Effectiveness of Early Intervention for Acute Low-Back Pain Patients: A One-Year Prospective Study

  • Robert J. Gatchel
  • Peter B. Polatin
  • Carl Noe
  • Margaret Gardea
  • Carla Pulliam
  • Judy Thompson
Article

Abstract

In an attempt to prevent acute low-back pain from becoming a chronic disability problem, an earlier study developed a statistical algorithm which accurately identified those acute low-back pain patients who were at high risk for developing such chronicity. The major goal of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of employing an early intervention program with these high-risk patients in order to prevent the development of chronic disability at a 1-year follow-up. Approximately 700 acute low-back pain patients were screened for their high-risk versus low-risk status. On the basis of this screening, high-risk patients were then randomly assigned to one of two groups: a functional restoration early intervention group (n = 22), or a nonintervention group (n = 48). A group of low-risk subjects (n = 54) who did not receive any early intervention was also evaluated. All these subjects were prospectively tracked at 3-month intervals starting from the date of their initial evaluation, culminating in a 12-month follow-up. During these follow-up evaluations, pain disability and socioeconomic outcomes (such as return-to-work and healthcare utilization) were assessed. Results clearly indicated that the high-risk subjects who received early intervention displayed statistically significant fewer indices of chronic pain disability on a wide range of work, healthcare utilization, medication use, and self-report pain variables, relative to the high-risk subjects who do not receive such early intervention. In addition, the high-risk nonintervention group displayed significantly more symptoms of chronic pain disability on these variables relative to the initially low-risk subjects. Cost-comparison savings data were also evaluated. These data revealed that there were greater cost savings associated with the early intervention group versus the no early intervention group. The overall results of this study clearly demonstrate the treatment- and cost-effectiveness of an early intervention program for acute low-back pain patients.

acute low-back pain cost effectiveness early intervention functional restoration treatment effectiveness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, Volinn E. Cost, controversy, crisis: Lowäback pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Pub Health 1991; 12: 141–156.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feuerstein M, Berkowitz SM, Peck CA. Musculoskeletal related disability in U.S. army personnel: Prevalence, gender, and military occupational specialties. J Occup Environ Med 1997; 39: 68Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krause N, Ragland DR. Occupational disability due to lowäback pain: A new interdisciplinary classification used in a phase model of disability. Spine 1994; 19: 1011–1020.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Research Council. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: Lowäback and upper extremities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crombie IK, Croft PR, Linton SJ, LeResche L, Von Korff M. Epidemiology of pain, Vol. I Seattle: IASP Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linton SJ. A cognitiveäbehavioral approach to the prevention of chronic back pain. In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ, eds. Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's Handbook, 2nd edn-New York: Guilford, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Mayer TG. The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low-back pain disability. Spine 1995; 20: 2702–2709.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linton SJ, Bradley LA. Strategies for the prevention of chronic pain. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, eds. Psychological approaches to pain management: A practitioner's handbook. New York: Guilford, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Kinney RK. Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: A prospective analysis. Health Psychol 1995; 14: 415–420.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pulliam C, Gatchel RJ, Gardea MA. Psychosocial differences in high risk versus lowärisk acute lowäback pain differences. J Occup Rehabil 2001; 11: 43–52.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lachin JM, Matts JP, Wei LJ. Randomization in clinical trials: Conclusions and recommendations. Control Clin Trials 1988; 9: 365–374.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stout RL, Wirtz PW, Carbonari JP, Del Boca FK. Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol 1994; 12: 70–75.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mayer TG, Prescott M, Gatchel RJ. Objective outcomes evaluation: Methods and evidence. In: Mayer TG, Polatin P, Gatchel RJ, eds. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: Function, outcomes and evidence. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H, Kishino N, Keeley J, Mooney V. Prospective twoäyear study of functional restoration in industrial lowäback injury. JAMA 1987; 259: 1181–1182.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hazard R, Fenwick J, Kalisch S, Redmond J, Reeves G, Reid S, Frymoyer J. Functional restoration with behavioral support: A oneäyear prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine 1989; 14: 157–161.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turk DC, Gatchel RJ. Psychological approaches to pain management, 2nd edn-New York: Guilford, 2002.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1992; 6: 301355.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2002 Report. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 2002.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Medical fees in the United States 2000. Los Angeles: Practice Management Information Corporation, 2002.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Drug topics Redbook 2000. Montvale, NJ: Thompson Medical Economics, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goossens MEJB, Evers SMAA. Economic evaluation of back pain interventions. J Occup Rehabil 1997; 7: 15–32.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell JH. Neural control of the circulation during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22: 141–154.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mitchell RI, Carmen GM. Results of a multicenter trial using an intensive active exercise program for the treatment of acute soft tissue and back injuries. Spine 1990; 15: 514–521.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mitchell RI, Carmen GM. The functional restoration approach to the treatment of chronic pain in patients with soft tissue and back injuries. Spine 1994; 19: 633–642.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Webster B, Snook S. The cost of 1989 workers' compensation lowäback pain claims. Spine 1994; 19: 1111–1116.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maetzel A. The economic burden of lowäback pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2002; 16: 23–30.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Annertz M, Wingstrand H, Stromqvist B, Holtas S. MR imaging as the primary modality for neuroradiologic evaluation of the lumbar spine. Acta Radiol 1996; 37: 373–380.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boden S, Swanson A. An assessment of the early management of spine problems and appropriateness of diagnostic imaging utilization. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 1998; 9: 411–417.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carey T, Garrett J, Jacknam A, McLaughlin C, Fryer J, Smucker D. The outcomes and costs of care for acute lowäback pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 913–917.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rosen N, Hoffberg H. Conservative management of lowäback pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 1998; 9: 435–472.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Friedlieb O. The impact of managed care on the diagnosis and treatment of low-back pain. Am J Med Qual 1994; 9: 24–29.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moffett JK, Torgenson D, BelläSayer S, Jackson D, Llewlyn-Phillips H, Farrin A, Barber J. Randomized controlled trial of exercise for low-back pain. BMJ 1999; 319: 279–283.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Butterfield P, Spencer P, Redmond N, Feldstein A, Perrin N. low-back pain: Predictors of absenteeism, residual symptoms, functional impairment, and medical costs in Oregon workers' compensation recipients. Am J Ind Med 1998; 34: 559–567.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Torstensen T, Ljunggren A, Meen H, Odland E, Mowinckel P, Geijerstan S. Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self exercise in patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 2616–2624.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Skouen J, Grasdal A, Haldorsen E, Ursin H. Relative cost effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low-back pain on long term sick leave. Spine 2002; 27: 901–910.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mannion A, Muntener M, Taimela S, Dvorak H. Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low-back pain. Rheumatology 2001; 40: 772–778.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bolten W, Kempel-Waibel A, Pforringer W. Analysis of the cost of illness in backache. Med Klin 1998; 93: 388–393.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    McInstosh G, Frank J, HoggäJohnson S, Bombardier C. Prognostic factors for time receiving workers' compensation benefits in a cohort of patients with low-back pain. Spine 2000; 25: 147–157.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chibnall J, Tait R, Merys S. Disability management of low-back injuries by employer retained physicians: Ratings and costs. Am J Ind Med 2000; 38: 529–538.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hashemi L, Webster B, Clancy E. Trends in disability duration and cost of workers' compensation low-back pain claims (1988–1996). JOEM 1998; 40: 1110–1119.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hashemi L, Webster B, Clancy E, Volinn E. Length of disability and cost of workers' compensation low-back pain claims. 39 1997;10.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sundararajan V, Konrad T, Garrett J, Carey T. Patterns and determinants of multiple provider use in patients with acute low-back pain. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 528–533.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Boden S, Dreyer S, Levy H. Management of low-back pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 1998; 9: 419–433.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Foa FB. Psychological treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 43–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Gatchel
    • 1
  • Peter B. Polatin
    • 1
  • Carl Noe
    • 1
  • Margaret Gardea
    • 1
  • Carla Pulliam
    • 1
  • Judy Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.The Eugene McDermott Center for Pain ManagementThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at DallasDallasTexas

Personalised recommendations