Attitudes Toward Persons with Down Syndrome: The Impact of Television

  • Heather Hall
  • Patricia Minnes
Article

Abstract

This study examined the impact of different styles of television portrayal of a young adult male with Down Syndrome upon the attitudes of 92 undergraduate students. Their attitudes were considered using measures of beliefs, feelings of comfort, behavioral intentions, volunteering intentions, social desirability and variables associated with previous contact (quality and quantity of contact and media exposure). Participants were assigned to experimental conditions based on television viewing preferences. They viewed one of three programs: “Man Alive: David” (documentary), “Life Goes On” (drama), or “My So Called Life” (control). A multiple stepwise regression yielded a number of predictors of attitudes including: gender, experimental condition, quality and quantity of previous contact, prior media exposure, and social desirability.

Down Syndrome attitudes impact of television 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Altman, B. M. (1981). Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Social Probl. 28(3): 321–337.Google Scholar
  2. Amir, V. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bull. 71: 319–342.Google Scholar
  3. Antonak, R. (1980). Psychometric analysis of the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale, Form O. Rehab. Counsel. Bull. 23: 169–176.Google Scholar
  4. Donaldson, J. (1980). Changing attitudes toward handicapped peers: A review and analysis of research. Except. Child. 46(7): 504–514.Google Scholar
  5. Donaldson, J. (1981). The visibility and image of handicapped people on television. Except. Child. 47(6): 413–416.Google Scholar
  6. Donaldson, J., and Martinson, M. C. (1977). Modifying attitudes toward physically disabled persons. Except. Child. 43: 337–341.Google Scholar
  7. Elliott, T. R., and Byrd, E. K. (1982). Media and disability. Rehab. Lit. 43(11–12): 348–355.Google Scholar
  8. Elliott, T. R., and Byrd, E. K. (1983). Attitude change toward disability through television portrayal. J. Appl. Rehab. Counsel. 14(2): 35–37.Google Scholar
  9. Elliott, T. R., and Byrd, E. K. (1984a). Video depictions of blindness and attitudes toward disability. J. Rehab. 50(1): 49–52.Google Scholar
  10. Elliott, T. R., and Byrd, E. K. (1984b). Attitude change toward disability through television: Portrayal with male college students. Int. J. Rehab. Res. 7(3): 320–322.Google Scholar
  11. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Furnham, A., and Gibbs, M. (1984). School children's attitudes towards the handicapped. J. Adol. 7: 99–117.Google Scholar
  13. Furnham, A., and Pendred, J. (1983). Attitudes toward the mentally and physically disabled. Brit. J. Med. Psychol. 56: 179–187.Google Scholar
  14. Gardner, J. M., and Radel, M. S. (1978). Portrait of the disabled in the media. J. Commun. Psychol. 6: 269–274.Google Scholar
  15. Gottlieb, J., and Gottlieb, B. W. (1977). Stereotypic attitudes and behavioural intentions toward handicapped children. Am. J. Ment. Def. 82(1): 65–71.Google Scholar
  16. Graffi, S., and Minnes, P. M. (1988). Social desirability and previous contact as predictors of attitudes toward disability. Paper presented at the American Association on Mental Retardation Annual Conference, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality Research Form Manual, Research Psychologists, London.Google Scholar
  18. King, S. M., Rosenbaum, P., Armstrong R. W., and Milner, R. (1989). An epidemiological study of children's attitudes towards disability. Devel. Med. Child Neurol. 31: 237–245.Google Scholar
  19. Klobas, L. E. (1988). Disability Drama in Television and Film, McFarland, Jefferson, NC.Google Scholar
  20. Liebert, R. (1975). Television and Attitudes Toward the Handicapped, New York State Education Department, Albany, NY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 115 068)Google Scholar
  21. Livneh, H. (1982). On the origins of negative attitudes toward people with disabilities. Rehab. Lit. 43(11–12): 338–347.Google Scholar
  22. Marcotte, G. M., and Minnes, P. M. (1989). Predictors of university students' attitudes toward physically disabled peers. Canad. Psychol. 30(2a): 229.Google Scholar
  23. Minnes, P. M., and Tsuk, K. (1986). Attitudes toward the limb deficient: The effect of prosthesis type. Canad. Psychol. 28(2a): 425.Google Scholar
  24. Sadlick, M., and Penta, F. B. (1975). Changing nurse attitudes toward quadriplegics through use of television. Rehab. Lit. 36: 274–283.Google Scholar
  25. Sandler, A., and Robinson, R. (1981). Public attitudes and community acceptance of mentally retarded persons: A review. Ed. Train. Ment. Retard. 16: 97–103.Google Scholar
  26. Stirling, P. (1991). Attitude change toward mentally retarded persons through television portrayal. Unpublished Honours B.A. thesis, Dept. of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Stoval, C., and Sedlacek, W. E. (1983). Attitudes of male and female university students toward students with different physical disabilities. J. Coll. Stud. Pers. 24: 325–330.Google Scholar
  28. Strong, E. (1987). Attitudes of young people toward persons with disabilities: A study at the high school level. Unpublished Honours BA thesis. Dept. of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitudes and Attitude Change, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Wisely, D. H., and Morgan, S. B. (1981). Childrens ratings of peers presented as mentally retarded and physically handicapped. Am. J. Ment. Def. 86: 281–286.Google Scholar
  31. Yuker, H. E., and Block, J. R. (1986). Research with the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale (ATDP) 1960–1985, Hofstra University, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Yuker, H. E., Block, J. R., & Young, J. H. (1970). The Measurement of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons, Human Resources Foundation, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather Hall
    • 1
    • 2
  • Patricia Minnes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyQueen's University at KingstonOntarioCanada
  2. 2.Memorial UniversitySt. John's

Personalised recommendations