Prevention Science

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 27–38 | Cite as

Characteristics of Effective School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention

Article

Abstract

This study summarizes, using meta-analytic techniques, results from 94 studies of school-based prevention activities that examined alcohol or other drug use outcomes. It set out to determine what features of school-based substance abuse prevention programs are related to variability in the size of program effects. It asked (1) Which populations (e.g., high risk vs. general population) should be targeted for prevention services? (2) What is the best age or developmental stage for prevention programming? (3) Does program duration matter? and (4) Does the role of the person delivering the service (e.g., teacher, law enforcement officer, peer) matter? The results suggest that targeting middle school aged children and designing programs that can be delivered primarily by peer leaders will increase the effectiveness of school-based substance use prevention programs. The results also imply that such programs need not be lengthy. The evidence related to the targeting issue is sparse, but suggests that, at least for programs teaching social competency skills, targeting higher risk youths may yield stronger effects than targeting the general population. Suggestions for future research are offered.

substance abuse prevention school 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., Cullen, F. T., Lab, S. P., & Whitehead, J. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.Google Scholar
  2. Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., & Solomon, D. (1996). Prevention effects of the Child Development Project: Early findings from an ongoing multisite demonstration trial. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(1), 12-35.Google Scholar
  3. Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-410). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, R. M., Ellickson, P. L., & Harrison, E. R. (1993). Do drug prevention effects persist into high school? How Project ALERT did with ninth graders. Preventive Medicine, 22, 463-483.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J. (1990). Substance abuse prevention: Theory, practice, and effectiveness. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 461-519). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Renick, N. L., Filazzola, A. D., & Botvin, E. M. (1984). A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention. Addictive Behaviors, 9, 137-147.Google Scholar
  7. Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S., & Orlandi, M. A. (1995). School-based health promotion: Substance abuse and sexual behavior. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4, 167-184.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J. H., & Kreft, I. G. G. (1998). Zero effects of drug prevention programs: Issues and solutions. Evaluation Review, 22(1), 3-14.Google Scholar
  9. Bry, B. H. (1982). Reducing the incidence of adolescent problems through preventive intervention: One-and five-year follow-up. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10(3), 265-276.Google Scholar
  10. Bry, B. H., & George, F. E. (1979). Evaluating and improving prevention programs: A strategy from drug abuse. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2, 127-136.Google Scholar
  11. Bry, B. H., & George, F. E. (1980). The preventive effects of early intervention on the attendance and grades of urban adolescents. Professional Psychology, 11, 252-260.Google Scholar
  12. Comer, J. P. (1985). The Yale-New Haven Primary Prevention Project: A follow-up study. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24(2), 54-160.Google Scholar
  13. Committee on Data and Research for Policy on Illegal Drugs (2001). Informing America's policy on illegal drugs: What we don't know keeps hurting us. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, T. D., Hunt, H. D., & Murphy, R. F. (1998). Comer's school development program in Chicago: A theory-based evaluation. Chicago, IL: Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  15. Dolan, L. J., Kellam, S. G., Brown, C. H., Werthamer-Larsson, L., Rebok, G. W., Mayer, L. S., Laudolff, J., Turkkan, J. S., Ford, C., & Wheeler, L. (1993). The short-term impact of two classroom-based preventive interventions on aggressive and shy behaviors and poor achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14, 317-345.Google Scholar
  16. Dryfoos, J. G. (1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Durlak, J. A. (1995). School-based prevention programs for children and adolescents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Eggert, L. L., Thompson, E. A., Herting, J. R., Nicholas, L. J., & Dicker, B. G. (1994). Preventing adolescent drug abuse and high school dropout through an intensive school-based social network development program. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8(3), 202-215.Google Scholar
  19. Ellickson, P. L., & Bell, R. M. (1990). Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247, 1299-1305.Google Scholar
  20. Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M., & McGuigan, K. (1993). Preventing adolescent drug use: Long-term results of a junior high program. American Journal of Public Health, 83(6), 856-861.Google Scholar
  21. Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994). How effective is Drug Abuse Resistance Education? A meta-analysis of Project D.A.R.E. outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1394-1401.Google Scholar
  22. Gerstein, D. R., & Green, L. W. (Eds.) (1993). Preventing drug abuse: What do we know? Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gorman, D. M. (1995). Are school-based resistance skills training programs effective in preventing alcohol misuse? Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 41, 74-98.Google Scholar
  24. Gottfredson, D. C. (1997). School-based crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. C. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising: A report to the United States Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  25. Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Schools and delinquency. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2002). Quality of school-based prevention programs: Results from a national survey. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(1), 3-35.Google Scholar
  27. Gottfredson, D. C., Wilson, D. B., & Najaka, S. S. (2002). School-based crime prevention. In D. P. Farrington, L. W. Sherman, B. Welsh, & D. L. Mackenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention. United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Gottfredson, G. D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). What schools do to prevent delinquency and promote safe environments. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(3), 313-344.Google Scholar
  29. Hansen, W. B., (1992). School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state of the art in curriculum: 1980-1990. Health Education Research, 7, 403-430.Google Scholar
  30. Hansen, W. B., & Graham, J. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414-430.Google Scholar
  31. Hansen, W. B., Johnson, C. A., Flay, B. R., Graham, J. W., & Sobel, J. (1988). Affective and social influences approaches to the prevention of multiple substance abuse among seventh grade students: Results from Project SMART. Preventive Medicine, 17, 135-154.Google Scholar
  32. Hansen, W. B., & O'Malley, P. M. (1996). Drug use. In R. J. DiClemente, W. B. Hansen, & L. E. Ponton (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior (pp. 161-192). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W., & Catalano, R. F. (1995). Preventing substance abuse. In M. Tonry & D. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention (pp. 343-427). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Huizinga, D., & Jacob-Chien, C. (1998). The contemporaneous co-occurrence of serious and violent juvenile offending and other problem behaviors. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 47-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Institute of Medicine (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kellam, S. G., & Anthony, J. C. (1998). Targeting early antecedents to prevent tobacco smoking: Findings frm an epidemiologically based randomized field trial. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1490-1995.Google Scholar
  37. Kellam, S. G., Rebok, G. W., Ialongo, N., & Mayer, L. S. (1994). The course and malleability of aggressive behavior from early first grade into middle school: Results of a developmental epidemiologically-based preventive trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 259-281.Google Scholar
  38. Light, R. J., Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1994). The visual presentation and interpretation of meta-analyses. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-410). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.Google Scholar
  40. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Lochman, J. E. (1992). Cognitive-behavioral intervention with aggressive boys: Three-year follow-up and preventive effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 426-432.Google Scholar
  42. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.Google Scholar
  43. Norman, E., & Turner, S. (1993). Adolescent substance abuse prevention programs: Theories, models, and research in the encouraging 80's. Journal of Primary Prevention, 14, 3-20.Google Scholar
  44. Perry, C. D., Grant, M., Ernberg, G., Florenzano, R. U., Langdon, M. C., Myeni, A. D., Waahlberg, R., Berg, S., Andersson, K., Fisher, J., Blaze-Temple, D., Cross, D., Saunders, B., Jacobs, D. R., & Schmid, T. (1989). WHO collaborative study on alcohol education and young people: Outcomes of a four-country pilot study. The International Journal of the Addictions, 24, 1145-1171.Google Scholar
  45. Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Toomey, T. L., Komro, K. A., Anstine, P. S., McGovern, P. G., Finnegan, J. R., Forster, J. L., Wagenaar, A. C., & Wolfson, M. (1996). Project Northland: Outcomes of a communitywide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 956-965.Google Scholar
  46. Robins, L. N., & Przybeck, T. R. (1985). Age of onset of drug use as a factor in drug and other disorders. In C. L. Jones & R. J. Battjes (Eds.), Etiology of drug abuse: Implications for prevention (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph No. 56). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  47. Tobler, N. S. (1992). Drug prevention programs can work: Research findings. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 11(3), 1-28.Google Scholar
  48. Tobler, N. S., & Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18(1), 71-128.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, D. B., Gottfredson, D. C., & Najaka, S. S. (2001). School-based prevention of problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17(3), 247-272.Google Scholar
  50. Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2000). Effects of school violence prevention programs on aggressive and disruptive behavior: A meta-analysis of outcome evaluations. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations