Mathematical Geology

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 789–799

The Variance-Based Cross-Variogram: You Can Add Apples and Oranges

  • Noel Cressie
  • Christopher K. Wikle
Article

Abstract

The variance-based cross-variogram between two spatial processes, Z1(·) and Z2(·), is var (Z1(u) − Z2(v)), expressed generally as a bivariate function of spatial locationsuandv. It characterizes the cross-spatial dependence between Z1(·) and Z2(·) and can be used to obtain optimal multivariable predictors (cokriging). It has also been called the pseudo cross-variogram; here we compare its properties to that of the traditional (covariance-based) cross-variogram, cov (Z1(u) − Z1(v), Z2(u) − Z2(v)). One concern with the variance-based cross-variogram has been that Z1(·) and Z2(·) might be measured in different units (“apples” and “oranges”). In this note, we show that the cokriging predictor based on variance-based cross-variograms can handle any units used for Z1(·) and Z2(·); recommendations are given for an appropriate choice of units. We review the differences between the variance-based cross-variogram and the covariance-based cross-variogram and conclude that the former is more appropriate for cokriging. In practice, one often assumes that variograms and cross-variograms are functions ofuandvonly through the differenceuv. This restricts the types of models that might be fitted to measures of cross-spatial dependence.

cokriging equivariance pseudo cross-variogram 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Clark, I., Basinger, K. L., and Harper, W. V., 1989, MUCK: A novel approach to co-kriging, in Buxton, B. E., ed., Proceedings of the Conference on Geostatistical, Sensitivity, and Uncertainty Methods for Ground-Water Flow and Radionuclide Transport Modeling: Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, p. 473–493.Google Scholar
  2. Cook, D., Cressie, N., Majure, J., and Symanzik, J., 1994, Some dynamic graphics for spatial data (with multiple attributes) in a GIS, in Dutter, R., and Grossman, W., eds., Compstat, Proceedings in Computational Statistics: Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, p. 105–119.Google Scholar
  3. Cressie, N., 1991, Statistics for spatial data: Wiley, New York, 900 p.Google Scholar
  4. Journe, A. G., and Huijbregts, C. J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, New York, 600 p.Google Scholar
  5. Kunsch, H. R., Papritz, A., and Bassi, F., 1997, Generalized cross-covariances and their estimation: Math. Geology, v. 29,no. 6, p. 779–799.Google Scholar
  6. Majure, J. J., and Cressie, N., 1997, Dynamic graphics for exploring spatial dependence in multivariate spatial data: Geographical Systems, v. 4,no. 2, p. 131–158.Google Scholar
  7. Myers, D., 1982, Matrix formulation of co-kriging: Math. Geology, v. 14,no. 3, p. 249–257.Google Scholar
  8. Myers, D. E., 1991, Pseudo cross-variograms, positive-definiteness, and cokriging: Math. Geology, v. 23,no. 6, p. 805–816.Google Scholar
  9. Myers, D. E., 1992, Kriging, cokriging, radial basis functions and the role of positive definiteness: Computers and Mathematics with Applications, v. 24,no. 12, p. 139–148.Google Scholar
  10. Papritz, A., Kunsch, H. R., and Webster, R., 1993, On the pseudo cross-variogram: Math. Geology, v. 25,no. 8, p. 1015–1026.Google Scholar
  11. Ver Hoef, J. M., and Barry, R. P., 1998, Constructing and fitting models for cokriging and multivariable spatial prediction: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  12. Ver Hoef, J. M., and Cressie, N., 1993, Multivariable spatial prediction: Math. Geology, v. 25,no. 2, p. 219–239.Google Scholar
  13. Wackernagel, H., 1988, Geostatistical techniques for interpreting multivariate spatial information, in Chung, C. F., Fabbri, A. G., and Sinding-Larsen, R., eds., Quantitative analysis of mineral and energy resources: Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 393–409.Google Scholar
  14. Wackernagel, H., 1995, Multivariate geostatistics: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 256 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noel Cressie
    • 1
  • Christopher K. Wikle
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsIowa State UniversityAmes
  2. 2.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulder

Personalised recommendations