Detection of Hepatoid Glands and Distinctive Features of the Hepatoid Acinus

  • S. A. Shabadash
  • T. I. Zelikina
Article

Abstract

In the 1920s–1930s, skin glands of a new type, hepatoid glands, were described in 13 mammal species (Rodentia, Canidae, and Bovidae). The hepatoid glands resemble sebaceous glands in their morphology, bur radically differ from them in specific structure of the acinus and another type of secretion. Later, these data either could not be confirmed or were considered insignificant and the hepatoid glands were described as modified sebaceous glands, glands with uncertain function, or modifications of epidermis. Based on the studies of various hepatoid glands in 22 species of Carniviora and Artiodactyla, the authors described in detail the characteristic features of the hepatoid acinus, which allow a precise discrimination of hepatoid and sebaceous glands. Extracellular secretory canaliculi have been described in the hepatoid glands, as well as the richness of hepatoid glands in protein, distribution of hydrophobic lipids in certain hepatoid glands, and formation of excretory ducts and cysts. The hepatoid glands are a source of great amounts of protein secreted in the merocrine way; the secretory substance of some of these glands has a strong odor.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Albone, E.S., Mammalian Semiochemistry, Chichester: Wiley, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Albone, E.S. and Flood, P.F., The Supracaudal Scent Gland of the Red Fox Vulpes vulpes, J. Chem. Ecol., 1976, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 167–175.Google Scholar
  3. Atoji, Y., Sugimura, M., and Suzuki, Y., Sebaceous Glands of the Infraorbital Gland of the Japanese Serow Capricornis crispus, J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol., 1989a, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 375–383.Google Scholar
  4. Atoji, Y., Suzuki, Y., and Sugimura, M., The Preputial Gland of the Japanese Serow Capricornis crispus: Ultrastructure and Lectin Histochemisty, Acta Anat., 1989b, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 245–252.Google Scholar
  5. Atoji, Y., Yamamoto, Y., and Suzuki, Y., Infraorbital Glands of a Male Formosan Serow (Capricornis crispus Swinhoei), Eur. J. Morphol., 1996, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 87–94.Google Scholar
  6. Atoji, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Komatsu, T., et al, Circumanal Glands of the Dog: A New Classification and Cell Degeneration, Anat. Record, 1998, vol. 250, no. 3, pp. 251–267.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, K.P., The Histology and Histochemistry of the Circumanal Hepatoid Glands of the Dog, J. Small. Anim. Practice, 1967, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 639–647.Google Scholar
  8. Budsberg, S.C. and Spurgeon, T.L., Microscopic Anatomy and Enzyme Histochemistry of the Canine Anal Canal, Anat. Histol. Embryol., 1983, vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 295–316.Google Scholar
  9. Burger, B.V., Yang, T.-P., Le Roux, M., et al, Mammalian Exocrine Secretions. XI. Constituents of the Preorbital Secretion of Klipspringer, Oreotragus oreotragus, J. Chem. Ecol., 1994, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2383–2400.Google Scholar
  10. Bykov, V.A., Tsitologiya i obshchaya gistologiya (Cytology and General Histology), St. Petersburg: Sotis, 2000a.Google Scholar
  11. Bykov, V.A., Chastnaya gistologiya cheloveka (Specific Human Histology), St. Petersburg: Sotis, 2000b.Google Scholar
  12. Castagnaro, M., Negro, M., and Valenza, F., Glycoconjugate Expression in Normal Hepatoid Glands and Hepatoid Gland Adenomas and Carcinomas in Dogs, Res. Vet. Sci., 1990, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 275–278.Google Scholar
  13. Claasen, C.-P. and Jungius, H., On Topography and Structure of the So-Called Glandular Subauricular Patch and the Inguinal Gland in the Reedbuck (Redunca arundinum), Z. Säugetierkd., 1973, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 97–109.Google Scholar
  14. Cordier, R., La glande du larmier d' Oreotragus saltator, Arch. Biol., 1931, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 59–69.Google Scholar
  15. Deich, A., Cytophotochemistry of Proteins, Vvedenie v kolichestvennuyu gistokhimiyu (Introduction to Quantitative Histochemistry), Moscow: Mir, 1969, pp. 359–372.Google Scholar
  16. Dellmann, H.-D., Veterinary Histology: An Outline Text-Atlas, Lea: Febiger, 1971.Google Scholar
  17. Gerisch, D. and Neurand, K., Topographie und Histologie der Drüsen der Regio analis des Hundes, Anat. Histol. Embriol., 1973, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 280–294.Google Scholar
  18. Gistologiya, tsitologiya i embriologiya (Histology, Cytology, and Embryology), Afanas'ev, Yu.I. and Yurina, N.A., Eds., Moscow: Meditsina, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. Gorgas, K. and Zaar, K., Peroxisomes in Sebaceous Glands. 3. Morphological Similarities of Peroxisomes with Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum and Golgi Stacks in the Circumanal Gland of the Dog, Anat. Embryol., 1984, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
  20. Ham, A. and Kormack, D., Gistologiya (Histology), Moscow: Mir, 1983.Google Scholar
  21. Isitor, G.N., Mode of Secretion and Obliteration of Lipid Vacuoles in Canine Hepatoid Circumanal Glands, Zentralbl. Vet. Med., 1981, vol. 10C, no. 1, pp. 90–91.Google Scholar
  22. Isitor, G.N., Comparative Ultrastructural Study of Normal, Adenomatous, Carcinomatous, and Hyperplastic Cells of Canine Hepatoid Circumanal Glands, Amer. J. Vet. Res., 1983, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 463–474.Google Scholar
  23. Isitor, G.N. and Weinman, D.E., Origin and Early Development of Canine Circumanal Glands, Amer. J. Vet. Res., 1979, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 487–492.Google Scholar
  24. Kodera, S., Suzuki, Y., and Sugimura, M., Postnatal Development and Histology of the Infraorbital Glands in the Japanese Serow, Capricornis crispus, Jpn. J. Vet. Sci., 1982, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 839–843.Google Scholar
  25. König, M., Mosimann, W., and Devaux, R.E., Micromorphology of the Circumanal Glands and the Tail Gland Area of Dogs, Vlaams Diergeneeskeindig Tijdschrift, 1985, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 278–286.Google Scholar
  26. Krölling, O., Ñber Bau, biologische und phylogenetische Bedeutung der Inguinalorgane bei den Gasellen, Z. Anat. Entwickl., 1930, vol. 91, nos. 5–6, pp. 553–579.Google Scholar
  27. Krölling, O., Ñber ein Hautdrüsenorgan bei Hydrochoerus capybara Erxt., Z. Mikr.-Anat. Forsch., 1932, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 621–636.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhn, C., Particles Resembling Microbodies in Normal and Neoplastic Perianal Glands of Dogs, Z. Zellforsch., 1968, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 554–562.Google Scholar
  29. Kuhn, H.-J., Antorbitaldrüse und Tränengang von Neotragus pygmaeus, Z. Säugetierkd., 1976, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 369–380.Google Scholar
  30. Kurosumi, K., Shibasaki, S., and Ito, T., Cytology of the Secretion in Mammalian Sweat Glands, Int. Rev. Cytol., 1984, vol. 87, pp. 253–329.Google Scholar
  31. Langegger, P.A., Ñber den Anus des Schakaals (Canis antus), Z. Mikr.-Anat. Forsch., 1938, vol. 43, nos. 1–2, pp.266–274.Google Scholar
  32. Macdonald, D.W., The Carnivores: Order Carnivora, Social Odours in Mammals, Brown, R.E. and Macdonald, D.W., Eds., Oxford: Clarendon, 1985, vol. 2, pp. 619–622.Google Scholar
  33. Mainoya, J.R., Histological Aspects of the Preorbital and Interdigital Glands of the Red Duiker (Cephalopus natalensis), East Afr. Wildlife J., 1978, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 265–272.Google Scholar
  34. Maita, K. and Ishida, K., Structure and Development of the Perianal Gland of the Dog, Jpn. J. Vet. Sci., 1975, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 349–356.Google Scholar
  35. Mathis, J., Das dorsale Schwanzorgan der Katze, Z. Mikr.-Anat. Forsch., 1935, vol. 37, nos. 1–4, pp. 443–466.Google Scholar
  36. Mathis, J., Das dorsale Schwanzorgan der Katze. 2. Mitteilung, Z. Mikr.-Anat. Forsch., 1936, vol. 40, nos. 1–4, pp. 531–540.Google Scholar
  37. Mett, U., Zur mikroskopischen Anatomie des Afters beim Hunde, Berlin: Diss., Berlin, 1936 (cited from: Schaffer, J., 1940; Gerisch, D., Neurand, K., 1973).Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, P., Das dorsale Schwanzorgan des Hundes-Glandulae caudae seu coccygis (Canis familiaris), Zentralbl. Vet. Med., 1971, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 541–557.Google Scholar
  39. Meyer, P. and Wilkens, H., Die “Viole” des Rotfuchses (Vulpes vulpes L.), Zentralbl. Vet. Med., 1971, vol. 18A, no. 4, pp. 353–364.Google Scholar
  40. Mezhdunarodnaya gistologicheskaya nomenklatura (International Histological Nomenclature), Moscow: Meditsina, 1987.Google Scholar
  41. Mislavskii, A.N., Materialy k gistologii slozhnykh trubchatykh (merokrinovykh) zhelez kozhi mlekopitayushchikh (Contributions to the Histology of Complex Tubular (Merocrine) Glands of Mammalian Skin), Kazan: Izd-vo Un-ta, 1909.Google Scholar
  42. Montagna, W. and Noback, C.R., The Histology of the Preputial Gland of the Rat, Anat. Rec., 1946, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
  43. Monteiro-Riviere, N.A. and Stinson, A.W., Integument, Textbook of Veterinary Histology, Dellmann, H.-D., Ed., 3rd ed., Lea: Febiger, 1993, pp. 285–312.Google Scholar
  44. Neurand, K. and Meyer, W., Die Drüsen der Analregion des Hundes, Tierärztl. Praxis, 1982, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 243–252.Google Scholar
  45. Niebauer, G.W., Die viol'sche Drüse des Hundes-Anatomie, Pathophysiologie und Klinik, Kleintier Prax., 1980, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 455–468.Google Scholar
  46. Nielsen, S.W., Glands of the Canine Skin-Morphology and Distribution, Amer. J. Vet. Res., 1953, vol. 14, no. 52, pp.418–454.Google Scholar
  47. Nielsen, S.W. and Aftosmis, J., Canine Perianal Gland Tumors, J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc., 1964, vol. 144, no. 2, pp.127–135.Google Scholar
  48. Ohe, H., Ñber das Vorkommen und den Bau der Zirkumoraldrüse der Katze, Anat. Anz., 1927, vol. 63, nos. 14/15, pp.193–218.Google Scholar
  49. Ortmann, R., Die Analregion der Säugetiere, Handb. Zoologie, 1960, vol. 8, no. 26, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
  50. Parks, H.F., Morphological and Cytochemical Observations on the Circumanal Glands of Dogs, Ph. D Thesis. Ithaca, N.G.: Cornell Univ, 1950, (cit from: Nielsen (1953); Baker (1967); Maita and Ishida (1975); Isitor and Weinman (1979); Budsberg and Spurgeon (1983); Schiffmann-Wyttenbach et al. (1983); König et al. (1985)).Google Scholar
  51. Richter, J., Untersuchungen an Antorbitaldrüsen von Madoqua (Bovidae, Mammalia), Z. Säugetierkd., 1971, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 334–342.Google Scholar
  52. Richter, J., Zur Kenntnis der Antorbitaldrüsen der Cephalophinae (Bovidae, Mammalia), Z. Säugetierkd., 1973, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 303–313.Google Scholar
  53. Romeis, B., Mikroskopicheskaya tekhnika (Microscopical Technique), Moscow: Inostr. Liter., 1953.Google Scholar
  54. Schaffer, J., Lehrbuch der Histologie und Histogenese, Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 1922.Google Scholar
  55. Schaffer, J., Neue Drüsen-Typen, Anat. Anz. Ergänzungsheft, 1923, vol. 57, pp. 242–252.Google Scholar
  56. Schaffer, J., Zur Einteilung der Hautdrüsen, Anat. Anz., 1924a, vol. 57, no. 18, pp. 353–372.Google Scholar
  57. Schaffer, J., Ñber Anal-und Circumanaldrüsen. 1. Geschichtlicher Ñberblick, Z. Wissensch. Zoologie, 1924b, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
  58. Schaffer, J., Zur Kenntnis der Hautdrüsen bei den Säugetieren und bei Myxine, Z. Anat. Entwickl., 1925, vol. 76, nos. 1/3. S. 320–337.Google Scholar
  59. Schaffer, J., Ñber die Hautdrüsen, Wien. Klin. Wochenschr., 1926, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  60. Schaffer, J., Das Epithelgewebe, Handb. Mikr. Anat. Mensch., Möllendorf, W., Ed., Berlin: Springer, 1927, vol. 2, part 1, pp. 1–231.Google Scholar
  61. Schaffer, J., Die Hautdrüsenorgane der Säugetiere, Berlin: Urban, Schwarzenberg, 1940.Google Scholar
  62. Schiefferdecker, P., Die Hautorgane des Menschen und der Säugertiere, ihre biologische und rassenanatomische Bedeutung sowie die Muscularis sexualis, Biol. Zentralbl., 1917, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 534–562.Google Scholar
  63. Schiffmann-Wyttenbach, E., Mosimann, W., and König, M., Nachweis verschiedener Hydroxysteroid-Dehydrogenasen in Circumanaldrüsen adelterer Hunde, Anat. Histol. Embryol., 1983, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 317–324.Google Scholar
  64. Schwartzman, R.M. and Orkin, M., A Comparative Study of Skin Diseases of Dog and Man, Springfield: Thomas, 1962.Google Scholar
  65. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., Specific Structural Features of Hepatoid Glands in Dogs: Extracellular Secretory Channels and Excretory Ducts, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol., 1991a, no. 1, pp. 94–105.Google Scholar
  66. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., Histological and Histochemical Characteristics of Hepatoid Circumanal Glands in Dogs: Similarity and Dissimilarity with Skin Glands of Other Types, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol., 1991b, no. 3, pp. 388–397.Google Scholar
  67. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., New Data on Histological variants of Hepatoid Glands: Succession of Histological Variants in Histogenesis of Circumanal Dog Glands, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Biol., 1993, no. 3, pp. 410–425.Google Scholar
  68. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., Cysts of Hepatoid Glands, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Biol., 1995a, no. 1, pp.32–47.Google Scholar
  69. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., Sexual Dimorphism of Hepatoid Circumanal Glands in Dogs and Dynamics of Its Development, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Biol., 1995b, no. 5, pp. 590–605.Google Scholar
  70. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., Tail Gland in Cats is Hepatoid, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Biol., 1997, no. 5, pp.556–570.Google Scholar
  71. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., Hepatoid Glands of Mammals: Perspective of Comparative Histological Studies of Skin Glands of a New Type, Zool. Zh., 1998, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 30–47.Google Scholar
  72. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., Once More about Hepatoid Circumanal Glands of Dogs: History of Their Discovery and Causes of Revision of Their Structure and Function, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Biol., 2002a, no. 2, pp. 176–185.Google Scholar
  73. Shabadash, S.A. and Zelikina, T.I., Controversies in Current Data on Structure and Function of Hepatoid Circumanal Glands in Dogs, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Biol., 2002b, no. 3, pp. 286–295.Google Scholar
  74. Sokolov, V.E., Chernova, O.F., Shabadash, S.A., et al, Hepatoid Glands of Bovidae (Artiodactyla). Representatives of the Genus Gazella, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol., 1991, no. 6, pp. 857–881.Google Scholar
  75. Sokolov, V.E., Chernova, O.F., Shabadash, S.A., et al, Hepatoid Glands of Representatives of the Genera Sylvicapra, Ourebia, Litocranius, and Nemorhaedus (Artiodactyla; Bovidae), Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Biol., 1992a, no. 2, pp.234–254.Google Scholar
  76. Sokolov, V.E., Chernova, O.F., Shabadash, S.A., et al, Histological Variants of Hepatoid Glands in Representatives of Canidae and Bovidae: Structural and Histochemical Characteristics, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Biol., 1992b, no. 3, pp.388–404.Google Scholar
  77. Sokolov, V.E., Shabadash, S.A., and Zelikina, T.I., Skin Glands, Ondatra: morfologiya, sistematika, ekologiya (The Muskrat: Morphology, Taxonomy, and Ecology), Sokolov, V.E. and Lavrov, N.P., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1993, pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
  78. Tosi, G., Vailati, G., Arduino, S., and Pacchetti, G., Morphology and Functionality of the Supraoccipital Glands in the Alpine Chamois Rupicapra rupicapra rupicapra, Bull. Zool., 1990, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 131–138.Google Scholar
  79. Zavarzin, A.A. and Rumyantsev, A.V., Kurs gistologii (A Textbook of Histology), Moscow: Medgiz, 1946.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Shabadash
    • 1
  • T. I. Zelikina
    • 1
  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and EvolutionRussian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii pr. 33MoscowMoscow

Personalised recommendations