Advertisement

The Journal of Supercomputing

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 203–211 | Cite as

Coordination Algorithm for Distributed Testing

  • Omar Rafiq
  • Leo Cacciari
Article

Abstract

With the emergence of new models, architectures and middleware such as ODP, TINA and CORBA, for developing open distributed systems, testing technology requires adaptation for use within conformance assessment in such systems. All these frameworks are object-based and aim at creating open distributed environments supporting interworking, interoperability, and portability, in spite of heterogeneity and autonomy of the related systems. In this context, an open distributed system may be viewed as a system providing standardized distributed interfaces for interacting with other systems. Conformance of such a system can be assessed by attaching a related tester at each provided interface. However, many problems of controllability and observability influencing fault detection during the testing process, arise if there is no coordination between the testers. In this paper, we show how to cope with these problems by using test coordination procedures in a distributed testing architecture.

distributed testing testing architecture controllability observability test coordination procedures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Cacciari and O. Rafiq. Controllability and observability in distributed testing. Information and Software Technology, 41:767–780, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC. OSI Conformance Testing Methodology and Framework, 9646, Parts 1-7, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO/IEC. ODP, Reference Model, 10746, Parts 1-4, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO/IEC. Information Retrieval, Transfer and Management for OSI, Framework: Formal Methods in Conformance Testing, CD 13345-1, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. F. Linington, J. Derrick, and H. Bowman. The specification and testing of conformance in ODP systems. In: Testing of Communicating Systems, pp. 93–114, Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Luo, R. Dssouli, G. v. Bochmann, P. Venkataram, and A. Ghedamsi. Test generation with respect to distributed interfaces. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 16:119–132, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    OMG. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification, Version 2.2. http://www.omg.org/corba, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Petrenko, G. v. Bochmann, and M. Yao. On fault coverage of tests for finite state specifications. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 29:81–106, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. Rafiq. The Astride testing approach: principles, tools and carrying out. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 11:85–94, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    TINA-C. Overall Concepts and Principles of TINA. http://www.tinac.com, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    X901. X901-ODP Reference Model, Part 1, Overview. ISO and ITU. 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omar Rafiq
    • 1
  • Leo Cacciari
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire TASCUniversity of PauPauFrance

Personalised recommendations