Climatic Change

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 291–319 | Cite as

Carbon Budget of the Indian Forest Ecosystem



The paper quantifies the role of Indian forests as source or sink of carbon. The model used in the study takes into account the growing stock, additional tree organs, dead biomass, litter layer and soil organic matter, harvesting and harvesting losses, effects of pests, fire etc., allocation of timber to wood products, life span of products including recycling and allocation to landfills. The net carbon balance calculated as the net source or sink of the forest sector was assessed for the year 1993–94. The study isimportant in view of the obligation placed by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) on the signatory nations to provide a periodic update of carbon budget in the atmosphere. For the available data and the underlying assumptions, the results of the carbon budget model indicated that the Indian forest sector acted as a source of 12.8 TgC (including accumulation of carbon in the dead biomass) for the year 1994. The results obtained reinforced the notion that an integrated approach is required in order to evaluate the forest sector's influence on the global atmospheric carbon levels. The model used in this study has the advantage that all the factors determining the carbon budget can be integrated and altered to determine their influence. The study also throws light on the issues that stand in the way of preparing through carbon budget for developing countries like India.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Burschel, B., Kursten, E., Larson, B. C., and Weber, M.: 1993, ‘Present Role of German Forests and Forestry in the National Carbon Budget and Options to Increase’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 70, 325–340.Google Scholar
  2. Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K.: 1968, A Revised Survey of Forest Types of India, Govt. of India Press, Delhi, p. 104.Google Scholar
  3. Dixon, R. K., Brown, S., Houghton, R. A., Solomon, A. M., Trexler, M. C., and Wisniewski, J.: 1994, ‘Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems’, Science 263, 185–190.Google Scholar
  4. Dewar, R. C. and Cannell, M. G. R.: 1992, ‘Carbon Sequestration in the Trees, Products and Soils of Forest Plantations: An Analysis Using U.K. Examples’, Tree Physiol. 11, 49–61.Google Scholar
  5. Erikkson, H.: 1991, ‘Sources and Sinks of Carbon Dioxide in Sweden’, Ambio 20, 146–150.Google Scholar
  6. Faeth, P., Cort, C., and Livernash, R.: 1994, Evaluation the Carbon Sequestration Benefits of Forest Projects in Developing Countries, WRI/EPA.Google Scholar
  7. FRI (Forest Research Institute): 1970, Indian Forest Utilisation: Vol. 1, Manager of Publications, FRI, Delhi.Google Scholar
  8. FSI (Forest Survey of India): 1995a, The State of Forest Report, FSI, Dehradun.Google Scholar
  9. FSI (Forest Survey of India): 1995b, Extent, Composition, Density of Growing Stock and Annual Increment of India's Forests, FSI, Dehradun.Google Scholar
  10. FSI (Forest Survey of India): 1987, State of the Forest Report, FSI, Dehradun.Google Scholar
  11. FSI (Forest Survey of India): 1999, State of the Forest Report, FSI, Dehradun.Google Scholar
  12. Haripriya, G. S.: 2000a: ‘Estimates of Biomass in Indian Forests’, Biomass Bioenergy 19, 245–258.Google Scholar
  13. Haripriya, G. S.: 2000b, ‘Environmental Accounting, Carbon Sequestration Potential and Policies for Carbon Mitigation in India’, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai.Google Scholar
  14. Haripriya, G. S.: 2001a: ‘Integrating Forest Resources into the National Accounts in India’, Environ. Resour. Econ. 19, 73–95.Google Scholar
  15. Haripriya, G. S.: 2001b, ‘A Framework for Carbon Stored in Indian Wood Products’, Environ. Develop. Sustainability 3, 229–251.Google Scholar
  16. Haripriya, G. S.: 2002, ‘Biomass Carbon of Truncated Diameter Classes in Indian Forests’, (article in press).Google Scholar
  17. Houghton, R. A.: 1991, ‘Tropical Deforestation and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide’, Clim. Change 19, 99–118.Google Scholar
  18. Houghton, R. A.: 1996, ‘Land-use Change and Terrestrial Carbon: The Temporal Record’, in Apps, M. J. and Price, D. T. (eds.), Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management and the Global Carbon Cycle, NATO ASI Series I (40), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 117–134.Google Scholar
  19. Houghton, R. A. and Hackler, J. A.: 2001, Carbon Flux to the Atmosphere from Land-use Change: 1850 to 1990, ORNL/CDIAC — 131, NDP — 050/R1, Tennessee, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  20. ICFRE (Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education): 1995, Forestry Statistics India, ICFRE, Dehradun.Google Scholar
  21. Indian Forest Statistics: 1947–72, Indian Forest Statistics, 1947-72, various issues, Manager of Publications, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  22. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1996, Climate Change 1995, Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate: Scientific-Technical Report Analyses, Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCCU.K., Cambridge University Press, p. 879.Google Scholar
  23. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1997, ‘Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vols. 1–3’, IPCC/OECD Joint Programme.Google Scholar
  24. Karjalainen, T. and Kellomäki, S.: 1993, ‘Carbon Storage in Forest Ecosystems in Finland’, in Kanninen, M. (ed.), Carbon Balance of the World's Forested Ecosystems; Towards a Global Estimate, Proceedings of an IPCC/AFOS Workshop, 1992, Joensuu, Finland.Google Scholar
  25. Kauppi, P. E., Mielikainen, K., and Kuusela A.: 1992, ‘Biomass and Carbon Budget of European Forests: 1971–1990’, Science 256, 70–78.Google Scholar
  26. Kolchugina, T. P. and Vinson, K. S.: 1993, ‘Carbon Sources and Sinks in Forest Biomes of the Former Soviet Union’, Global Biogeochem. Cycles 7, 291–304.Google Scholar
  27. Kurz, W. A., Apps, M. J., Webb, T. M., and McNamee, P. J.: 1992, The Carbon Budget of Canadian Forest Sector: Phase I, Information Report NOR-X-326, Northwest Region, Forestry Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Lal, J. B.: 1991, Indian Forests, Myth and Reality, Nataraj Publishers, Dehradun.Google Scholar
  29. Levine, J. (ed.): 1991, Global Biomass Burning: Atmospheric, Climatic and Biospheric Implications, MIT Press, Cambridge, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  30. Maclaren, J. P. and Wakelin, S. J.: 1991, Forestry and Forest Products as a Carbon Sink in New Zealand, Forestry Research Bulletin No. 162, Forestry Research Institute (FRI), Rotorua, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  31. Makundi, W., Sathaye, J., and Ketoff, A.: 1995, ‘COPATH — a Spreadsheet Model for the Estimation of Carbon Flows Associated with the Use of Forest Resources’, Biomass Bioenergy 8.Google Scholar
  32. Makundi, W., Sathaye, J., and Masera, O.: 1996, Carbon Emissions and Sequestration in Forests: Summary of Case Studies from Seven Developing Countries', Clim. Change 33.Google Scholar
  33. Nilsson, S. and Schopfhauser, W.: 1995, ‘The Carbon Sequestration Potential of a Global Afforestation Program’, Clim. Change 30, 267–293.Google Scholar
  34. Ravindranath, N. H., Somasekhar, B. S., and Gadgil, M.: 1996, ‘Carbon Flows in Indian Forest’, Clim. Change 35, 297–320.Google Scholar
  35. Sedjo, R.: 1992, ‘Temperate Forest Ecosystems in the Global Carbon Cycle’, Ambio 21, 274–277.Google Scholar
  36. TERI (Tata Energy Research Institute): 1998, India National Report on Asia Least-Cost Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategy (ALGAS), TERI, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  37. Tewari, D. N.: 1995a, A Monograph on Sal, International Book Distributors, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
  38. Tewari, D. N.: 1995b, A Monograph on Chirpine, International Book Distributors, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
  39. Tewari, D. N.: 1995c, A Monograph on Teak, International Book Distributors, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
  40. Turner, D. P., Koerper, G. J., Harmon, M. E., and Lee, J. J.: 1995, ‘A Carbon Budget for Forests of the Coterminous United States’, Ecol. Appl. 5, 421–436.Google Scholar
  41. UNFCC: 1992, United Framework Convention on Climate Change, A/AC. 237/18, 9 May, New York, U.S.A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Royal Swedish Academy of SciencesThe Beijer InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations