, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 15–26 | Cite as

Choice or circumstance: The UK as the location of asylum applications by Bosnian and Somali refugees

  • Kate Day
  • Paul White


Questions concerning why asylum seekers make their applications in particular countries rather than others have not been fully researched. Some explanation can be found via aggregate migration theories, but there is a need to consider the circumstances of individual movers. Respondents here were drawn from amongst Bosnian and Somali refugees in northern England. The interviews showed that asylum movement is of a variety of types, with two stage migration commonly involved – firstly immediate flight to a neighbouring haven, and secondly on to a more permanent place of settlement. Very few respondents had any real choice in where they ended up. Instead, family circumstances, cultural connections, and the actions of a variety of institutions produced scenarios in which there was generally no alternative to the actual destination arrived at. It is suggested that a mix of individual level and institutional explanations is needed to understand patterns of asylum destinations.


Asylum Seeker Refugee Camp Refugee Status Somali Woman Cultural Connection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baganha M.I., Ferrão J. and Malheiros J.M., 1999: Immigrants and the labour market: The Portuguese case. InProceedings, Metropolis International Workshop, Lisbon, September 28-29, 1998, pp. 89–120.Fundação Luso-Americana para o Desenvolvimento, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  2. Boyle P., Halfacree K. and Robinson V., 1998: Exploring Contemporary Migration. Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
  3. Castles S. and Miller M.J., 1993: The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  4. Collinson S., 1996: Visa requirements, carrier sanctions, ‘safe third countries’ and ‘readmission’: the development of an asylum 'buffer zone' in Europe. Transact. Instit. British Geogr. 21: 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Findlay A.M. and Garrick L., 1990: Scottish emigration in the 1980s: A migration channels approach to the study of skilled international migration.Transact. Instit. British Geogr. 15: 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gutting D., 1996: Narrative identity and residential history. Area 28: 482–490.Google Scholar
  7. Halfacree K. and Boyle P., 1993: The challenge facing migration research: the case for a biographical approach. Progress in Human Geography 17: 333–348.Google Scholar
  8. Havinga T. and Böcker A., 1999: Country of asylum by choice or by chance: asylum-seekers in Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK. J.Ethnic Migrat. Studies 25: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Home Office, 2000: Asylum Statistics, United Kingdom 1999, HomeOffice Statistical Bulletin, Issue 17/00, 12 Oct. 2000.Google Scholar
  10. Hovy B., 1993: Asylum migration in Europe: patterns, determinants and the role of East-West movements. In: King R.(ed.), The New Geography of European Migrations, pp. 207–227. Belhaven, London.Google Scholar
  11. Johansson R., 1990: The refugee experience in Europe after World War II: some theoretical and empirical considerations. In: Rystad G.(ed.), The Uprooted: Forced Migration as International Problem in the Post-War Era, pp. 227–269. Lund University Press, Lund.Google Scholar
  12. King R. and Knights M., 1994: Bangladeshis in Rome: A case of migratory opportunism. In: Gould W.T.S. and Findlay A.M. (eds), Population Migration and the Changing World Order, pp. 127–143. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  13. Knights M., 1996: Migration in the New World Order: The Case of Bangladeshi Migration to Rome, Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  14. Koser K., 1996: Information and refugee migration: the case of Mozambicans in Malawi. Tijdschr. Econom. Soc. Geogr. 87: 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koser K., 1997: Social networks and the asylum cycle: the case of Iranians in the Netherlands. Intern. Migration Rev. 31: 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koser K., 1998: Out of the frying pan and into the fire: a case study of illegality amongst asylum seekers. In: Koser K. and Lutz H. (eds), The New Migration in Europe: Social Constructions and Social Realities, pp. 185–98. Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  17. Koser K., 2000: Asylum policies, trafficking and vulnerability. Intern.Migration, 38: 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunz E., 1973: The refugee in flight: kinetic models and forms of displacement. Intern. Migration Rev. 7: 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McHugh K.E., 2000: Inside, outside, upside down, backward, forward, round and round: A case for ethnographic studies in migration. Progr.Hum. Geogr. 24: 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Riddle L.A. and Buckley C., 1998: Forced migration and destination choice: Armenian forced settlers and refugees in the Russian Federation.Intern. Migration 36: 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Robinson V. and Coleman C., 2000: Lessons learned? A critical review of the government program to resettle Bosnian quota refugees in the United Kingdom. Intern. Migration Rev. 34: 1217–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Silvey R. and Lawson V., 1999: Placing the migrant. Ann. Assoc. Am.Geogr. 89: 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stein B., 1981: The refugee experience: Defining the parameters of a field of study. Intern. Migration Rev. 15: 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UNHCR (United Nations High Commission for Refugees), 2000: Refugees by Numbers: 2000 Edition. ref/numbers/numb2000.pdf[accessed April 2001].Google Scholar
  25. UNHCR (web site), Refugees and Others of Concern to UNHCR-1999 Statistical Overview. [accessed April 2001].Google Scholar
  26. Wong D., 1991: Asylum as a relationship of otherness: A study of asylumholders in Nuremberg, Germany. J. Refugee Studies 4: 150–163.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Day
    • 1
  • Paul White
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations