Journal of Automated Reasoning

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 107–124 | Cite as

Vanquishing the XCB Question: The Methodological Discovery of the Last Shortest Single Axiom for the Equivalential Calculus

  • Larry Wos
  • Dolph Ulrich
  • Branden Fitelson

Abstract

With the inclusion of an effective methodology, this article answers in detail a question that, for a quarter of a century, remained open despite intense study by various researchers. Is the formula XCB=e(x,e(e(e(x,y),e(z,y)),z)) a single axiom for the classical equivalential calculus when the rules of inference consist of detachment (modus ponens) and substitution Where the function e represents equivalence, this calculus can be axiomatized quite naturally with the formulas e(x,x), e(e(x,y),e(y,x)), and e(e(x,y),e(e(y,z),e(x,z))), which correspond to reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, respectively. (We note that e(x,x) is dependent on the other two axioms.) Heretofore, thirteen shortest single axioms for classical equivalence of length eleven had been discovered, and XCB was the only remaining formula of that length whose status was undetermined. To show that XCB is indeed such a single axiom, we focus on the rule of condensed detachment, a rule that captures detachment together with an appropriately general, but restricted, form of substitution. The proof we present in this paper consists of twenty-five applications of condensed detachment, completing with the deduction of transitivity followed by a deduction of symmetry. We also discuss some factors that may explain in part why XCB resisted relinquishing its treasure for so long. Our approach relied on diverse strategies applied by the automated reasoning program OTTER. Thus ends the search for shortest single axioms for the equivalential calculus.

equivalence equivalential calculus single axioms shortest single axioms detachment condensed detachment XCB OTTER automated reasoning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Belnap, N.: The two-property, Relevance Logic Newsletter 1(1976), 173-180.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hodgson, K.: Shortest single axioms for the equivalential calculus with CD and RCD, J. Automated Reasoning 20(1998), 283-316.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalman, J. A.: A shortest single axiom for the classical equivalential calculus, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 19(1978), 141-144.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalman, J. A.: The two-property and condensed detachment, Studia Logica 41(1982), 173-179.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalman, J. A.: Condensed detachment as a rule of inference, Studia Logica 42(1983), 443-451.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lukasiewicz, J.: Selected Works, edited by L. Borokowski, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCune, W.: OTTER 3.0 reference manual and guide, Tech. Report ANL-94/6, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meredith, C. A. and Prior, A.: Notes on the axiomatics of the propositional calculus, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 4(3) (1963), 171-187.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peterson, J. G.: The possible shortest single axioms for EC-tautologies, Report 105, Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thiele, R. and Wos, L.: Hilbert's twenty-fourth problem, J. Automated Reasoning, to appear.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veroff, R.: Using hints to increase the effectiveness of an automated reasoning program: Case studies, J. Automated Reasoning 16(3) (1996), 223-239.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wos, L., Winker, S., Veroff, R., Smith, B. and Henschen, L.: Questions concerning possible shortest single axioms for the equivalential calculus: An application of automated theorem proving to infinite domains, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 24(1983), 205-223.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wos, L.: Meeting the challenge of fifty years of logic, J. Automated Reasoning 6(1990), 213-232.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wos, L. and Pieper, G. W.: A Fascinating Country in the World of Computing: Your Guide to Automated Reasoning, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wos, L.: The strategy of cramming, J. Automated Reasoning, accepted.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wos, L., Ulrich, D. and Fitelson, B.: XCB, the last of the shortest single axioms for the classical equivalential calculus, Bulletin of the Section on Logic, accepted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry Wos
    • 1
  • Dolph Ulrich
    • 2
  • Branden Fitelson
    • 3
  1. 1.Mathematics and Computer Science DivisionArgonne National LaboratoryArgonneU.S.A. e-mail
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteU.S.A. e-mail
  3. 3.Philosophy DepartmentSan Jose State UniversitySan JoseU.S.A. e-mail

Personalised recommendations