Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 51–70 | Cite as

Solving for the X: Aspirations and Expectations of College Students

  • Arlene Eskilson
  • Mary Glenn Wiley


We questioned if there is a set of values and goals that distinguish Generation X individuals by asking 462 college students in four institutions to think ahead ten years, and rate the importance of success in various life domains to their future satisfaction. We also asked them to indicate obstacles, if any, that might prove to be barriers as they sought their life goals. As predicted, there was considerable value consensus across race, gender, and social class categories, and little to suggest that Generation X college students differ from preceding generations in their core concerns; for example, women students attached greater importance than men to attaining family goals, but men and women students did not differ in the importance they attached to economic success. Unexpectedly, we found that students of color rated economic success as more important than did white students. Women students of both races, and minority students of both genders, anticipated discrimination as a likely future obstacle. Contrary to the popular assumption of Generation X alienation, most students thought it likely that they would achieve their life goals, although students whose parents were less well-educated expressed concern that difficulties with “connections,” money, and getting the right education might impede their future success. Despite the general optimism of the youths we studied, we found no correlation between college academic performance as measured by grade point average, and the importance attached to future material success, suggesting that their hopes for the future may not be founded on present effort and accomplishment.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Briere, N. M., Gagnon, A., and Pelletier, L. G. (1990). Significance, structure, and gender differences in life domains of college students. Sex Roles 22: 199–212.Google Scholar
  2. Booth, A., Brinkerhoff, D. B., and White, L. K. (1984). The impact of parental divorce on courtship. J. Marriage Family 46: 85–94.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, R. J. (1994). Generation X: Measures, sex and age differences. Psychol. Rep. 74: 555–562.Google Scholar
  4. DiBenedetto, B., and Tittle, C. K. (1990). Gender and adult roles: Role commitment of women and men in a job-family trade-off context. J. Counsel. Psychol. 37: 41–48.Google Scholar
  5. Generation X-onomics. (1994, March 19). The Economist pp. 27–28.Google Scholar
  6. Granrose, C. S. (1985, June 4). Plans for work careers among college women who expect to have families. Vocat. Guid. Quart. 33: 284–295.Google Scholar
  7. Greene, A. L., and Wheatley, S. M. (1992). “I've got a lot to do and I don't think I'll have the time”: Gender difference in late adolescents' narratives of the future. J. Youth Adolesc. 21: 667–686.Google Scholar
  8. Hammersla, J. F., and Frease-McMahan, L. F. (1990). University students' priorities: Life goals vs. relationships. Sex Roles 23: 1–14.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffman, F. (1992). Gender paradoxes in college student development. In College Student Development. Whitaker, L., and Slimack, R. (Ed.). Hawthorn Press, Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
  10. Holtz, G. T. (1995). Welcome to the Jungle. St. Martin's Griffin, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Kasser, T., and Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. J. Personal. Social Psychol. 65: 410–422.Google Scholar
  12. Loeb, P. R. (1994). Generation at the Crossroads. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Richie, K. (1995, April). Marketing to Generation X. Am. Demog., pp. 34–39.Google Scholar
  14. Sidel, R. (1990). On Her Own: Growing Up in the Shadow of the American Dream. Viking Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Sorosky, A. (1977). The psychological effects of divorce on children. Adolescence 12: 123–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Stevens, C. J., Puchtell, L. A., Ryu, S., and Mortimer, J. (1992). Adolescent work and boys' and girls' orientations to the future. Sociol. Quart. 33: 153–169.Google Scholar
  17. Zill, N., and Robinson, J. (1995, April). The Generation X difference. Am. Demog., pp. 24–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arlene Eskilson
    • 1
  • Mary Glenn Wiley
    • 2
  1. 1.Lake Forest CollegeUSA
  2. 2.University of Illinois atChicago

Personalised recommendations