Landscape Ecology

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 569–586 | Cite as

The influence of research scale on bald eagle habitat selection along the lower Hudson River, New York (USA)

  • Craig M. Thompson
  • Kevin McGarigal


As the concepts of landscape ecology have been incorporated into otherdisciplines, the influence of spatial patterns on animal abundance anddistribution has attracted considerable attention. However, there remains asignificant gap in the application of landscape ecology theories and techniquesto wildlife research. By combining landscape ecology techniques withtraditionalwildlife habitat analysis methods, we defined an ‘organism-centeredperspective’for breeding bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) alongthe Hudson River, New York, USA. We intensively monitored four pairs ofbreedingeagles during the 1999 and 2000 breeding seasons, and collected detailedinformation on perch and forage locations. Our analysis focused on threecritical habitat elements: available perch trees, access to foraging areas, andfreedom from human disturbance. We hypothesized that eagle habitat selectionrelative to each of these elementswould vary with the spatial scale of analysis, and that these scalingrelationships would vary among habitat elements. We investigated two elementsofspatial scale: grain and local extent. Grain was defined as the minimum mappingunit; local extent was defined by the size of an analysis window placed aroundeach focal point. For each habitat element, we quantified habitat use over arange of spatial scales. Eagles displayed scale-dependent patterns of habitatuse in relation to all habitat features, including multi-scale andthreshold-like patterns. This information supports the existence ofscale-dependant relationships in wildlife habitat use and allowed for a moreaccurate and biologically relevant evaluation of Hudson River breeding eagle habitat.

Extent Grain Habitat selection Haliaeetus leucocephalus Multi-scale Scale Threshold 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aebischer N.J., Robertson P.A. and Kenward R.E. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313-1325.Google Scholar
  2. Addicott J.F., Aho J.M., Antolin M.F., Padilla D.L., Richardson J.S. and Soluk D.A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340-346.Google Scholar
  3. Alldredge J.R. and Ratti J.T. 1986. Comparison of some statistical techniques for analysis of resource selection. Journal of Wildlife Management 50: 157-165.Google Scholar
  4. Allen T.F.H. and Starr T.B. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Andrew J.M. and Mosher J.A. 1982. Bald Eagle nest site selection and nesting habitat in Maryland. Journal of Wildlife Management 46: 383-390.Google Scholar
  6. Anthony R.G. and Isaacs F.B. 1989. Characteristics of Bald Eagle nest sites in Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 148-159.Google Scholar
  7. Baker B.W., Cade B.S., Mangus W.L. and McMillen J.L. 1995. Spatial analysis of sandhill crane nesting habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 752-758.Google Scholar
  8. Bowerman W.W. 1993. Regulation of Bald Eagle (Halieaetus leucocephalus) productivity in the Great Lakes Basin: an ecological and toxicological approach. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Brown B.T. and Stevens L.E. 1997. Winter bald eagle distribution is inversely correlated with human activity along the Colorado River, Arizona. Journal of Raptor Research 31: 7-10.Google Scholar
  10. Buehler D.A., Mersmann T.J., Fraser J.D. and Seegar J.K.D. 1991. Effects of human activity on Bald Eagle distribution on the Northern Chesapeake Bay. Journal ofWildlife Management 55: 282-290.Google Scholar
  11. Byers C.R., Steinhorst R.K. and Krausman P.R. 1984. Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 1050-1053.Google Scholar
  12. Cain S.L. and Hodges J.I. 1989. A floating-fish snare for capturing bald eagles. Journal of Raptor Research 23: 10-13.Google Scholar
  13. Forman R.T.T. and Godron M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser J.D., Frenzel L.D. and Mathisen J.E. 1985. The impacts of human activities on breeding Bald Eagles in North-Central Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management 49: 585-592.Google Scholar
  15. Garrett M.G., Watson J.W. and Anthony R.G. 1993. Bald eagle home range and habitat use in the Columbia River Estuary. Journal of Wildlife Management 57: 19-27.Google Scholar
  16. Gerrard J.M., Gerrard P., Maher W.J. and Whitfield D.W.A. 1975. Factors influencing nest site selection of bald eagles in Northern Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Blue Jay 33: 169-177.Google Scholar
  17. Gibbs J.P. 1998. Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient. Landscape Ecology 13: 263-268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grubb T.G. 1995. Food habits of bald eagles breeding in the Arizona desert. Wilson Bulletin 10: 258-274.Google Scholar
  19. Grubb T.G. and King R.M. 1991. Assessing human disturbance of breeding bald eagles with classification tree models. Journal of Wildlife Management 55: 500-511.Google Scholar
  20. Hall L.S. and Mannan R.W. 1999. Multi-scaled habitat selection by elegant trogons in southeastern Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 451-461.Google Scholar
  21. Hardesty J.L. and Collpoy M.W. 1991. History, demography, distribution, habitat use and management of the southern Bald Eagle on Merritt Island National Wildlife Reserve, Florida. Final report. Log ref # 88-43. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Hunt W.G., Driscoll D. and Jackman R. 1992. Ecology of Bald Eagles in Arizona. Report to U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Bio-Systems Analysis, Santa Cruz, California, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Jackman R.E., Hunt W.G., Driscoll D.E. and Jenkins J.M. 1993. A modified floating-fish snare for capture of inland bald eagles. North American Bird Bander 18: 98-101.Google Scholar
  24. Kerkhoff A.J., Milne B.T. and Maehr D.S. 2000. Toward a panthercentered view of the forests of South Florida. Conservation Ecology 4: 1-30.Google Scholar
  25. Kolasa J. and Rollo C.D. 1991. Introduction: the heterogeneity of heterogeneity: a glossary. In: Kolasa J. and Pickett S.T.A. (eds), Ecological Heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA, pp. 1-23.Google Scholar
  26. Kotliar N.B. and Wiens J.A. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchial framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253-260.Google Scholar
  27. Lamberson R.H., McKelvey R., Noon B.R. and Voss C. 1992. A dynamic analysis of Northern spotted owl viability in a fragmented forest landscape. Conservation Biology 6: 505-512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levine S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943-1967.Google Scholar
  29. Litvaitis J.A., Titus K. and Anderson E.M. 1996. Measuring vertebrate use of terrestrial habitats and foods. In: Bookhout T.A. (ed.), Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats. 5th edn. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, pp. 254-274.Google Scholar
  30. Livingston S.A., Todd S., Krohn W.B. and Owen R.B. 1990. Habitat models for nesting bald eagles in Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management 54: 644-653.Google Scholar
  31. McClean S.A., Rumble M.A., King R.M. and Bake W.L. 1998. Evaluation of resource selection methods with different definitions of availability. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 793-801.Google Scholar
  32. McEwan L.C. and Hirth D.H. 1979. Southern bald eagle productivity and nest site selection. Journal of Wildlife Management 43: 585-594.Google Scholar
  33. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A. and Stafford S.G. 2000. Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  34. McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-351. US Forest Service, NW Forest Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  35. McGarigal K., Anthony R.G. and Isaacs F.B. 1991. Interactions of humans and bald eagles on the Columbia River estuary. Wildlife Monographs 115.Google Scholar
  36. Morris D.W. 1987. Ecological scale and habitat use. Ecology 68: 362-369.Google Scholar
  37. Neu C.W., Byers C.R. and Peek J.M. 1974. Technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 541-545.Google Scholar
  38. Orrock J.L., Pagels J.F., McShea W.J. and Harper E.K. 2000. Predicting presence and abundance of a small mammal species: the effect of scale and resolution. Ecological Applications 10: 1356-1366.Google Scholar
  39. Otis D.L. 1997. Analysis of habitat selection studies with multiple patches within cover types. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 1016-1022.Google Scholar
  40. Otis D.L. and White G.C. 1999. Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 1039-1044.Google Scholar
  41. Pearson S.M. and Gardner R.H. 1997. Neutral models: useful tools for understanding landscape patterns. In: Bissonette J.A. (ed.), Wildlife and Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA, pp. 215-230.Google Scholar
  42. Peery M.Z., Gutierrez R.J. and Seamans M.E. 1999. Habitat composition and configuration around Mexican spotted owl nest and roost sites in the Tularosa Mountains, New Mexico. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 36-43.Google Scholar
  43. Schulz T.T. and Joyce L.A. 1992. A spatial application of a marten habitat model. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20: 74-83.Google Scholar
  44. Stalmaster M.V. 1987. The Bald Eagle. Universe Books, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Stalmaster M.V. and Newman J.R. 1978. Behavioral responses of wintering bald eagles to human activity. Journal of Wildlife Management 42: 506-513.Google Scholar
  46. Stalmaster M.V. and Kaiser J.L. 1998. Effects of recreation activity on wintering bald eagles. Wildlife Monographs 137.Google Scholar
  47. Steidl R.J. and Anthony R.G. 1996. Responses of bald eagles to human activity during the summer in interior Alaska. Ecological Applications 6: 482-491.Google Scholar
  48. Thomas D.T. and Taylor E.J. 1990. Study designs and test for comparing resource use and availability. Journal of Wildlife Management 54: 322-330.Google Scholar
  49. Thompson C., Schmidt G.A. and Garcelon D.K. 2000. Status and Movements of Bald Eagles of the Hudson River Corridor. Final report to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Endangered Species Unit. Institute for Wildlife Studies, Arcata, California, USA, 44pp.Google Scholar
  50. Turner M.G. 1989. Landscape Ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 20: 171-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  52. Turner M.G., Pearson S.M., Romme W.H. and Wallace L.L. 1997. Landscape heterogeneity and ungulate dynamics; what spatial scales are important? In: Bissonette J.A. (ed.), Wildlife and Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA, pp. 215-230.Google Scholar
  53. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H. and O’Neill R.V. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  54. Urban D.L., O’Neill R.V. and Shugart H.H. 1987. Landscape Ecology. Bioscience 37: 119-127.Google Scholar
  55. USFWS 1996. Regionally Significant Habitats and Habitat Complexes of the New York Bight Watershed. Southern New England New York Bight Coastal Ecosystem Project. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Charlestown, Rhode Island, USA.Google Scholar
  56. Watson J.A. and Anthony R.G. 1986. Ecology of bald eagles in the Tongue Point area, Lower Columbia River. Final report #DACW57-83-C-0100, Army Corps of Engineers. Oregon Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit. Dept. of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, 98 pp.Google Scholar
  57. Wiens J.A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 7: 81-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wiens J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385-397.Google Scholar
  59. Wiens J.A., Rotenberry J.T. and Van Horne B. 1987. Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrubsteppe birds: the effects of spatial scale. Oikos 48: 132-147.Google Scholar
  60. Williams B.K. 1981. Discriminant analysis in wildlife research: theory and applications. In: Capen D.E. (ed.), The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies of Wildlife Habitat. University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA, pp. 59-71.Google Scholar
  61. With K.A. and Crist T.O. 1995. Critical thresholds in species’ responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76: 2446-2459.Google Scholar
  62. Wood P.B. 1999. Bald eagle response to boating activity in northcentral Florida. Journal of Raptor Research 33: 97-101.Google Scholar
  63. Young J.A. and Squires D.F. 1993. Human manipulation of the historical Hudson shoreline, a geographical approach. Section I. In: Waldman J.R. and Nieder W.C. (eds), Final reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program. Hudson River Foundation, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig M. Thompson
    • 1
  • Kevin McGarigal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resource ConservationUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations