Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 3–34 | Cite as

High Stakes: Time Poverty, Testing, and the Children of the Working Poor

  • Katherine S. Newman
  • Margaret M. Chin

Abstract

Sociological interest in the implementation of policy generally focuses on the ways a single stream of policy creates a set of measurable consequences either for parents or children. This article takes an ethnographic approach to the study of conflicting policy mandates that collide in the lives of families moving from welfare to work at the same time that schools are implementing high stakes tests and the end of social promotion. We show that these two policies make contradictory demands on parents, to the potential detriment of children. Ethnographic research reveals the ways in which multiple and incompatible forms of policy impact poor families, putting them in the unhappy position of choosing between economic stability or mobility and children's educational performance.

welfare reform testing working poor time poverty children in poverty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, K. L, Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1994). On the success of failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Federation of Teachers. (1997). Passing on failure: District promotion policies and practices. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.Google Scholar
  3. Annie E. Casey Foundation. (1998). Childcare you can count on: Model programs and policies. Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Baydar, N., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1991). Effects of maternal employment and child care arrangements in infancy on preschoolers' cognitive and behavioral outcomes: Evidence from the children of the NLSY. Developmental Psychology, 27, 918-931.Google Scholar
  5. Belsky, J., & Eggebeen, D. (1991). Early and extensive maternal employment child care and 4–6 yearolds' socioemotional development: Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 1083-1099.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, F., & Grossberg, A. (1992). Maternal labor supply and children's cognitive development. Review of Economic and Statistics, 74, 474-481.Google Scholar
  7. Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E., & Swanberg, J. (1998). The 1997 National Study of the Changing Workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Boo, K. (2001). After welfare. New Yorker, April 9, 93-107.Google Scholar
  9. Bos, H., Huston, A., Granger, R., Duncan, G., Brock, T., & McLloyd, V. (1999). New hope for people with low incomes: Two-year results of a program to reduce poverty and reform welfare. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, April.Google Scholar
  10. Brodkin, E. (1997). Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review, 71, 1-33.Google Scholar
  11. Brooks, J., Hair, E., & Zaslow, M. (2001). Welfare reform's impact on adolescents: Early warning signs. Child Trends Research Briefs, 2001-2005. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Brooks-Gunn, J., Han, W. J., & Waldfogel, J. (2002). Maternal employment and child cognitive outcomes in the first three years of life: The NICHD Study of Early Child Care. Child Development, 73, 1052-1072.Google Scholar
  13. Dawson, D. (1991). Family structure and children's health and well-being: Data from the 1988 National Health Interview Survey on Child Health. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 573-584.Google Scholar
  14. Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1995). A parent's economic shadow: Family structure versus family resources as influences on early school achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 399-409.Google Scholar
  15. Fiscal Policy Institute. (2001). The state of working New York 2001: Working harder, growing apart. New York City: Fiscal Policy Institute. www.fiscalpolicy.org/sowny/links.stm.Google Scholar
  16. Gennetian, L, Duncan, G., Knox, V., Vargas, W., Clark-Kaufmann, E., London, A. (2002). How welfare and work policies for parents affect adolescents: A synthesis of research. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, May.Google Scholar
  17. Halpern, R. (1999). After-school programs for low-income children: Promises and challenges. In The future of children: When school is out (pp. 81-95). Los Altos, CA: David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 9.Google Scholar
  18. Han, W., Waldfogel, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2001). The effects of early maternal employment on late cognitive and behavioral outcomes. The Journal of Marriage of Family, 63, 336-354.Google Scholar
  19. Hancock, L. (2001). Hands to work. New York: William Morris.Google Scholar
  20. Hauser, R. (1999). Shall we end social promotion? Truth or consequences. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, CDE Working Paper No. 99–06.Google Scholar
  21. Heubert, J., & Hauser, R. (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  22. Heymann, J. (2000). The widening gap: Why America's working families are in jeopardy and what can be done about it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffman, L., Youngblade, L., Coley, R., Fuligni, A., & Kovacs, D. (1999). Mothers at work: Effects on children's well-being. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Holmes, C. T. (1989). Grade level retention effects: A meta-analysis of research studies. In L. A. Shepard & M. L. Smith (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 16-33). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  25. Huston, A. (2002). Reforms and child development. In The future of children, vol. 12, no. 1 (pp. 59-78). Los Altos, CA: Center for the Future of Children, David and Lucile Packard Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kao, G. (1999). Psychological well-being and educational achievement among immigrant youth. In D. J. Hernandez (Ed.), Children of immigrants: Health, adjustment, and public assistance (pp. 410-477). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kaufman, P., & Bradby, D. (1992). Characteristics of at-risk students in NELS:88. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES.Google Scholar
  29. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  30. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of individuals in public services. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. McCoy, A. R., & Reynolds, A. J. (1998). Grade retention and school performance: An extended investigation. Discussion Paper 1167–98. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, August.Google Scholar
  32. McLanahan, S. S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Meyers, M., Glaser, B., & MacDonald, K. (1998). On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms?? Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 1-22.Google Scholar
  34. Morris, P., Huston, A., Duncan, G., Crosby, D., & Bos, J. (2001). How welfare and work policies affect children: A synthesis of research. An MDRC report. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  35. Morris, P., Knox, V., & Gennetian, L. (2002). Welfare policies matter for children and youth: Lessons for TANF reauthorization. MDRC policy brief. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, March.Google Scholar
  36. Morris, P., & Michalopoulos, G. (2000). The self-sufficiency project at 36 months: Effects on children of a program that increase partial employment and income. Canada: SDRC, June.Google Scholar
  37. Newman, K. S. (1999). No shame in my game. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. and the Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Orfield, G., & Kornhaber, M. L. (2001). Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education. New York: The Century Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. Pallas, A., Natriello, G., & McDill, E. (1989). The changing nature of the disadvantaged population: Current dimensions and future trends. Educational Researcher, 18, 6-22.Google Scholar
  40. Rumberger, R. W., & Larson, K. A. (1998). Toward explaining differences in educational achievement among Mexican American language-minority students. Sociology of Education, 71, 69-93.Google Scholar
  41. Shepard, L., & Smith, M. (1996). Failed evidence on grade retention. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 251-261Google Scholar
  42. Steinberg, J. (1998a). Chancellor vows to fail students lacking in skills. New York Times, April 21, Al.Google Scholar
  43. Steinberg, J. (1998b). Crew's plan to hold back failing students had familiar ring. New York Times, April 26, 29.Google Scholar
  44. Waldfogel, J., Han, W., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2002). The effects of early maternal employment on child development. Demography, 39, 369-392.Google Scholar
  45. Zaslow, M., McGroder, S., Cave, & Marnier, C. (1999). Maternal employment and measures of children's health and development among families with some history of welfare receipt. Research in the Sociology of Work, 7, 233-259.Google Scholar
  46. Zaslow, M., Moore, K., Brooks, J., Morris, P., Tout, K., Redd, Z., & Emig, C. (2002). Experimental studies of welfare reform and children. In The future of children, vol. 12, no. 1 (pp. 79-96). Los Altos, CA: David and Lucile Packard Foundation.Google Scholar
  47. Zill, N. (1996a). Family change and student achievement: What we have learned, what it means for schools. In A. Booth & J. P. Dunn (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? (pp. 139-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  48. Zill, N. (1996b). Parental schooling and children's health. Public Health Reports, 11, 34-43.Google Scholar
  49. Zill, N., Collins, N., West, J., & Germino-Hausken, E. (1995). Approaching kindergarten: A look at preschoolers in the United States. NCES 95-280. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  50. Zill, N., & West, J. (2000). Entering kindergarten: A portrait of American children when they begin school. In The condition of education 2000 (pp. xvi-xlvii). NCES 2000–06. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine S. Newman
    • 1
  • Margaret M. Chin
  1. 1.School of GovernmentHarvard UniversityCambridge

Personalised recommendations