Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 11, Issue 12, pp 2217–2238 | Cite as

Assessing New Zealand fern diversity from spatial predictions of species assemblages

  • A. Lehmann
  • J.R. Leathwick
  • J.McC. Overton
Article

Abstract

The utility of explicit spatial predictions for biodiversity assessment is investigated with New Zealand fern flora. Distributions of 43 species were modelled from climatic and landform variables and predicted across New Zealand using generalised additive models (GAM). An original package of functions called generalised regression analysis and spatial prediction (GRASP) was developed to perform the analyses. On average, for the 43 models, the contributions of environmental variables indicate that mean annual temperature is the most important factor at this broad regional scale. Both annual solar radiation and its seasonality had higher correlations than temperature seasonality. Measures of water availability such as ratio of rainfall to potential evapotranspiration, air saturation deficit and soil water deficit presented significant contributions. Lithology was a better predictor than slope and drainage. These results are similar to those obtained from analyses of the distributions of New Zealand tree species and are consistent with the hypothesis that both tree and fern diversity are highest on sites conducive to high productivity. In order to identify hotspots of fern diversity, spatial predictions of individual species were summed up. The resulting map gave a very similar result to the direct prediction of their corresponding richness (number of species by plot out of 43 spp.). As a consequence, and where individual species models were not all available, the number of species within different species assemblages was directly modelled. Predicted richness hotspots of total species (out of 122 spp.), selected species (out of 43 and 21 spp.) and common species (out of 23 spp.) present very similar spatial patterns and are highly correlated. Richness of uncommon species (out of 39 spp.) was also accurately predicted, but presented a different spatial pattern. The number of rare species (out of 60 spp.) was not correctly modelled. Even though the lack of data for rare species clearly limits the application of this approach, fern community composition of more common species can be partially reconstructed from individual species predictions. This case study offers therefore a consistent approach not only for biodiversity hotspots identification, but also for setting targets to biodiversity assessment and restoration programs.

Biodiversity hotspot Climate Generalized additive models Generalized regression analysis and spatial predictions Geographic information systems Species distribution modelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen R.B. 1992. RECCE: An Inventory Method for Describing New Zealand Vegetation. Forest Research Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  2. Allen R.B., Bellingham P.J. and Wiser S.K. 1999. Immediate damage by an earthquake to a temperate mountain forest. Ecology 80: 708–714.Google Scholar
  3. Alonso-Amelot M.E. and Rodulfo-Baechler S. 1996. Comparative spatial distribution, size, biomass and growth rate of two varieties of bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum L. Kuhn) in a neotropical montane habitat. Vegetatio 125: 137–147.Google Scholar
  4. Austin M.P. 1999. The potential contribution of vegetation ecology to biodiversity research. Ecography 22: 465–484.Google Scholar
  5. Austin M.P. and Graywood M.J. 1994. Current problems of environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theory. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 473–482.Google Scholar
  6. Austin M.P. and Meyers J.A. 1996. Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: Implication for management of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecological Management 85: 95–106.Google Scholar
  7. Austin M.P. and Smith T.M. 1989. A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio 83: 35–47.Google Scholar
  8. Austin M.P., Cawsey E.M., Baker B.L., Yialeloglou M.M., Grice D.J. and Briggs S.V. 2000. Predicted vegetation cover in the central Lachlan region. Final report of the Natural Heritage Trust Project AA 1368.97, CSIRO Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  9. Austin M.P., Pausas J.G. and Nicholls A.O. 1996. Patterns of tree species richness in relation to environment in southeastern New South Wales, Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 21: 154–164.Google Scholar
  10. Barnard P., Brown C.J., Jarvis A.M., Robertson A. and Vanrooyen L. 1998. Extending the Namibian protected area network to safeguard hotspots of endemism and diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 531–547.Google Scholar
  11. Belbin L. 1989. PATN: Pattern Analysis Package. CSIRO, Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Bio A.M.F., Alkemade R. and Barendregt A. 1998. Determining alternative models for vegetation response analysis – a non-parametric approach. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 5–16.Google Scholar
  13. Brownsey P.J. 2001. New Zealand's pteridophyte flora – plants of ancient lineage but recent arrival? Brittonia 53: 284–303.Google Scholar
  14. Brownsey P.J. and Smith-Dodsworth J.C. 1989. New Zealand Ferns and Allied Plants. David Bateman, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  15. Cawsey E.M., Austin M.P. and Baker B.L. 2002. Regional vegetation mapping in Australia: a case study in the practical use of statistical modelling. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 2239–2274 (this issue).Google Scholar
  16. Crisp P.N., Dickinson K.J.M. and Gibbs G.W. 1998. Does native invertebrate diversity reflect native plant diversity – a case study from New Zealand and implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 83: 209–220.Google Scholar
  17. Dobson A.P., Rodriguez J.P., Roberts W.M. and Wilcove D.S. 1997. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275: 550–553.Google Scholar
  18. Fielding A.H. and Bell J.F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24: 38–49.Google Scholar
  19. Franklin J. 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography 19: 474–499.Google Scholar
  20. Franklin J. 1998. Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climate and terrain-derived variables. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 733–748.Google Scholar
  21. Grime J.P. 1988. The C-S-R model of primary plant strategies – origins, implications and tests. In: Gottlieb L.D. and Jain S.K. (eds) Plant Evolution Biology. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 371–393.Google Scholar
  22. Guisan A., Theurillat J.-P. and Kienast F. 1998. Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 65–74.Google Scholar
  23. Hastie T.J. and Tibshirani R.J. 1997. Generalized Additive Models – Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 43. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  24. Hietz P. and Briones O. 1998. Correlation between water relations and within-canopy distribution of epiphytic ferns in a mexican cloud forest. Oecologia 114: 305–316.Google Scholar
  25. Howard P.C., Viskanic P., Davenport T.R.B., Kigenyi F.W., Baltzer M., Dickinson C.J., Lwanga J.S., Matthews, R.A. and Balmford A. 1998. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394: 472–475.Google Scholar
  26. Iverson L.R. and Prasad A.M. 1998. Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecological Monograph 68: 465–485.Google Scholar
  27. Jaffre T., Bouchet P. and Veillon J.M. 1998. Threatened plants of New Caledonia – Is the system of protected areas adequate. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 109–135.Google Scholar
  28. Keddy P.A. 1994. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 3: 157–164.Google Scholar
  29. Kelly D. 1994. Demography and conservation of Botrychium-Australe, a peculiar, sparse mycorrhizal fern. New Zealand Journal of Botany 32: 393–400.Google Scholar
  30. Landsberg J.J. 1986. Physiological Ecology of Forest Production. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Leathwick J.R. 1998. Are New Zealand's Nothofagus species in equilibrium with their environment? Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 719–732.Google Scholar
  32. Leathwick J.R. and Austin M.P. 2001. Competitive interaction between tree species in New Zealand's old-growth indigenous forests. Ecology 82: 2560–2573.Google Scholar
  33. Leathwick J.R. and Stephens R.T.T. 1998. Climate surfaces for New Zealand. Landcare Research. Contract Report LC9798/126.Google Scholar
  34. Leathwick J.R., Burns B.R. and Clarkson B.D. 1998. Environmental correlates of tree alpha-diversity in New Zealand primary forests. Ecography 21: 235–246.Google Scholar
  35. Leathwick J.R., Whitehead D. and McLeod M. 1996. Predicting changes in the composition of New Zealand's indigenous forests in response to global warning: A modeling approach. Environmental Software 11: 81–90.Google Scholar
  36. Lehmann A. 1998. GIS modeling of submerged macrophyte distribution using Generalized Additive Models. Plant Ecology 139: 113–124.Google Scholar
  37. Lehmann A., Overton J.McC. and Leathwick J.R. 2002. GRASP: Generalized Regression Analysis and Spatial Predictions. Ecological Modelling 157: 187–205.Google Scholar
  38. Lwanga J.S., Balmford A. and Badaza R. 1998. Assessing fern diversity: relative species richness and its environmental correlates in Uganda. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1387–1398.Google Scholar
  39. Margules C.R. and Nicholls A.O. 1994. Where should nature reserves be located?. In: Moritz C., Kikkaura J. and Doley D. (eds) Conservation Biology in Australia and Oceania. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, Australia.Google Scholar
  40. Margules C.R. and Redhead T.D. 1995. BioRap: Guidelines for Using the BioRapMethodology and Tools. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  41. Margules C.R., Nicholls A.O. and Austin M.P. 1987. Diversity of Eucalyptus species predicted by a multivariable environmental gradient. Oecologia (Berl.) 71: 229–232.Google Scholar
  42. Margules C.R., Nicholls A.O. and Pressey R.L. 1988. Selecting network of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 50: 63–76.Google Scholar
  43. Margules C.R., Cresswell I.D. and Nicholls A.D. 1994. A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas. In: Forey P.L., Humphries C.J. and Vane-Wright R.I. (eds) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  44. McMaster R.T. 1994. Ecology, reproductive biology and population genetics of Ophioglossum vulgatum (Ophioglassaceae ) in Massachusetts. Rhodora 96: 259–286.Google Scholar
  45. Newsome P.F.J. 1992. New Zealand Resource Inventory. ARC/INFO datamanual. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR), Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  46. Odland A., Birks H.J.B. and Line J.M. 1995. Ecological optima and tolerances of Thelypteris limbosperma, Athyrium distentifolium, and Matteuccia struthiopteris along environmental gradients in Western Norway. Vegetatio 120: 115–129.Google Scholar
  47. Ogden J., Braggins J., Stretton K. and Anderson S. 1997. Plant species richness under Pinus radiata stands on the central North Island volcanic plateau, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21: 17–29.Google Scholar
  48. Overton J.McC., Leathwick J.R. and Lehmann A. 2000. Predict first, classify later – a new paradigm of spatial classification for environmental management: a revolution in the mapping of vegetation, soil, land cover, and other environmental information. 4th International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modelling (GIS/EM4), Canada (http://www.Colorado.EDU/research/cires/banff/upload/80/).Google Scholar
  49. Pakeman R.J. and Marrs R.H. 1996. Modelling the effects of climate change on the growth of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum ) in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 561–575.Google Scholar
  50. Parris B.S. 1976. Ecology and biogeography of New Zealand pteridophytes. British Fern Gazette 11: 231–245.Google Scholar
  51. Pausas B.S. 1994. Species richness patterns in the understorey of Pyrenean Pinus Sylvestris forest. Journal of Vegetation Sciences 5: 517–524.Google Scholar
  52. Pausas J.G. and Austin M.P. 2001. Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: an appraisal. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 153–166.Google Scholar
  53. Pearson D.L. 1995. Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. In: Haksworth D.L. (ed) Biodiversity. Measurement and Estimation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 75–79.Google Scholar
  54. Peters D. and Thackway R. 1998. A new biogeographic regionalisation for Tasmania. Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service GIS section, Hobart, Australia.Google Scholar
  55. Pharo E.J., Beattie A.J. and Binns D. 1999. Vascular plant diversity as a surrogate for bryophyte and lichen diversity. Conservation Biology 13: 282–292.Google Scholar
  56. Poulsen A.D. and Nielsen I.H. 1995. How many ferns are there in one hectare of tropical rain forest? American Fern Journal 85: 29–35.Google Scholar
  57. Poulsen A.D. and Tuomisto H. 1996. Small-scale to confidential distribution patterns of neotropical pteridophytes: the role of edaphic preferences. In: Camus J.M., Gibby M. and Johns R.J. (eds) Pteridology in Perspective. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, UK, pp. 551–561.Google Scholar
  58. Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H., Eversham B.C. and Gibbons D.W. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337.Google Scholar
  59. Reid W.V. 1998. Biodiversity hotspots. TREE 13: 275–280.Google Scholar
  60. Russell A.E., Raich J.W. and Vitousek P.M. 1998. The ecology of the climbing fern Dicranopteris linearis on Windward Mauna Loa, Hawaii. Journal of Ecology 86: 765–779.Google Scholar
  61. Scott J.M. and Jennings M.D. 1997. A description of the National Gap Analysis Program. Biological Research Division, US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  62. Scott J.M., Davis F., Csuti B., Noss R., Butterfield B., Groves C., Anderson H., Caicco S., D'Erchia F., Edwards T.C. Jr, Ulmann J. and Wright G. 1993. Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123: 1–41.Google Scholar
  63. Skov F. and Borchsenius F. 1997. Predicting plant species distribution patterns using simple climatic parameters – a case study of Ecuadorian palms. Ecography 20: 347–355.Google Scholar
  64. Tilman D. 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75: 2–16.Google Scholar
  65. Tuomisto H. and Poulsen A.D. 1996. Influence of edaphic specialization on pteridophyte distribution in neotropical rain forests. Journal of Biogeography 23: 283–293.Google Scholar
  66. van Jaarsveld A.S., Freitag S., Chown S.L., Muller C., Koch S., Hull H., Bellamy C., Kruger M., Endrody-Younga S., Mansell M.W. and Scholtz C.H. 1998. Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science 279: 2106–2108.Google Scholar
  67. Vazquez J.A. and Norman G. 1995. Identification of site-types important for rare ferns in an area of deciduous woodland in Northwest Spain. Vegetatio 116: 133–146.Google Scholar
  68. Vogel J.C., Rumsey F.J., Schneller J.J., Barrett J.A. and Gibby M. 1999. Where are the glacial refugia in Europe? Evidence from pteridophytes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 66: 23–37.Google Scholar
  69. Wardle P. 1991. Vegetation of New Zealand. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  70. Williams P., Gibbons D., Margules C., Rebelo A., Humphries C. and Pressey R. 1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10: 155–174.Google Scholar
  71. Wiser S.K., Allen R.B., Clinton P.W. and Platt K.H. 1998. Community structure and forest invasion by an exotic herb over 23 years. Ecology 79: 2071–2081.Google Scholar
  72. Wiser S.K., Bellingham P.J. and Burrows L.E. 2001. Managing biodiversity information: development of New Zealand's National Vegetation Survey databank. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 25: 1–17.Google Scholar
  73. Yee T.W. and Mitchell N.D. 1991. Generalized Additive Models in plant ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 587–602.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Lehmann
    • 1
  • J.R. Leathwick
    • 1
  • J.McC. Overton
    • 1
  1. 1.Manaaki Whenua – Landcare ResearchHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations