Advertisement

Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus

, Volume 2, Issue 5–6, pp 43–60 | Cite as

Potential and Shortcomings of Numerical Weather Prediction Models in Providing Meteorological Data for Urban Air Pollution Forecasting

  • Alexander Baklanov
  • Alix Rasmussen
  • Barbara Fay
  • Erik Berge
  • Sandro Finardi
Article

Abstract

The last decade progress in numericalweather prediction (NWP) modelling and studies of urbanatmospheric processes for providing meteorological data forurban air pollution forecasting is analysed on examples ofseveral European meteorological centres. Modern nested NWP models are utilising land-use databasesdown to 1 km resolution or finer, and are approaching thenecessary horizontal and vertical resolution suitable forcity scale. The recent scientific developments in the fieldof urban atmospheric physics and the growing availabilityof high-resolution urban surface characteristics datapromise further improvements of the capability of NWPmodels for this aim. A strategy to improve NWP data forthe urban air pollution forecasting is suggested.

numerical weather prediction models operational urban air quality information and forecastingsystems urban air pollution episodes urban boundary layer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baklanov, A.: 2000, ‘Application of CFD methods for modelling in air pollution problems: Possibilities and gaps’, J. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 65, 181–189.Google Scholar
  2. Berge, E., Walker, S.-E., Sorteberg, A., Lenkopane, M., Eastwood, S., Jablonska, J. and Ødegaard, M.: 2002, ‘A real-time operational forecast model for meteorology and air quality during peak air pollution episodes in Oslo, Norway’, Water, Air and Soil Pollut. this issue.Google Scholar
  3. Byun, D. W. and Ching, J. K. S.: 1999, Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modelling System, EPA/600/R-99/030, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  4. Clean City Air Status Report: 1999, ‘Development and Testing of a Pilot Model for Air Quality in Oslo and Bergen’, Results from Oslo. DNMI, Norway.Google Scholar
  5. De Ridder, K.: 2000, ‘Modelling the Impact of Urban/Regional Scale Land-use Patterns on At-mospheric Flow and Pollutant Dispersion’, in SIMPAQ-2000, VIT 2000/TAP/55, Antwerp, pp. 32–37.Google Scholar
  6. Fay, B., Schrodin, R., Jacobsen, I. and Engelbart, D.: 1997, ‘Validation of Mixing Heights Derived from the Operational NWP Models at the German Weather Service’, in EURASAP Workshop Proc. on the Determin. of the Mixing Height – Current Progress and Problems, Risø-R-997(EN), pp. 55–58.Google Scholar
  7. Fenger, J., Hertel, O. and Palmgren, F.: 1998, Urban Air Pollution – European Aspects,Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. Fisher, B. E. A., Erbrink, J. J, Finardi, S., Jeannet, P., Joffre, S., Morselli, M. G., Pechinger, U., Seibert, P. and Thomson, D. J.: 1998, ‘Harmonisation of the Pre-processing of Meteorological Data for Atmospheric Dispersion Models. COST Action 710’, Fin. Rep., EUR 18195. EC/92/72: Directive 92/72/EC of 21 Sept on Air Pollution by Ozone, J. Europ. Comm. L297/1. EC/96/62: Directive 96/62/EC of 27 Sept on Ambient Air Quality Assess. a. Managem., J. EC L296/55. EC/99/30: Directive 99/30/EC of 22 April Relating to Limit Values for Sulphur Dioxide, Nitrogen Dioxide and Oxides of Nitrogen, Particulate Matter and Lead in Ambient Air, J. EC L163/41.Google Scholar
  9. Grimmond, C. S. B. and Oke, T. R.: 1999, ‘Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form’, J. Appl. Met. 38, 1262–1292.Google Scholar
  10. Guilloteau, E. and Mestayer, P. G.: 2000, ‘Numerical simulations of the urban roughness sublayer: A first attempt’, J. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 65(1/2), 211–219.Google Scholar
  11. Hanna, S., Yang, R. and Yin, X.: 1998, ‘Evaluations of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models from the point of view of inputs required by atmospheric dispersion models’, Int. J. of Environ. and Pollut.Google Scholar
  12. Herrmann, H., Ervens, B., Jakobi, H.-W., Wolke, R., Nowacki, P. and Zellner, R.: 2000, ‘CAPRAM.3:A chemical aqueous phase radical mechanism for tropospheric chemistry’, J. Atmosph. Chem. 36(3), 231–284.Google Scholar
  13. Lin, Q. and Bornstein, R.: 1999, ‘Summary of Urban Effects on Precipitation’, in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Biomet. a. Urban Climat. at the Turn of the Millennium, Sydney, 8–12 November 1999, ICUC16.1.Google Scholar
  14. LM: 1999, Quarterly Report of the Operational NWP-models of the Deutscher Wetterdienst, No. 20, 1–63, Department of Research and Development, DWD.Google Scholar
  15. Martilli, A., Clappier, A. and Rotach, M. W.: 2001, ‘An urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models’, submitted to Bound.-Layer Meteor.Google Scholar
  16. Masson, V.: 2000, ‘A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in the atmospheric models’, Bound.-Layer Meteor. 94, 357–397.Google Scholar
  17. Parlow, E.: 1999, ‘Remotely Sensed Heat Fluxes of Urban Areas’, Int. Conf. on Biomet. and Urban Climatol. at the Turn of the Millennium, Sydney, Australia, 8–12 November 1999, ICUC13.3.Google Scholar
  18. Pielke, R. A. and Uliasz, M.: 1998, ‘Use of meteorological models as input to regional and mesoscale air quality models – Limitations and strengths’, Atmosph. Environ. 32(8), 1455–1466.Google Scholar
  19. Pielke, R. A., Cotton, W. R. et al.: 1992, ‘A comprehensive meteorological modeling system – RAMS’, Meteorol. Atmos. Physics 49, 69–91.Google Scholar
  20. Piringer, M., Baklanov, A., De Ridder, K., Ferreira, J., Joffre, S., Karppinen, K., Mestayer, P., Middleton, D., Tombrou, M. and Vogt, R.: 2001, ‘The surface energy budget and the mixing height in urban areas: Status report of Working Group 2 of Cost-Action 715’, in Proc. of the Third Urban Air Quality Conference, Loutraki, Greece. CD-ROM, paper Pl 1.3. 8 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Pirovano, G., Brusasca, G., Calori, G., Desiato, F., Finardi, S., Lena, F., Longhetto, A. and Morselli, M. G.: 1999, ‘Meteorological input for photochemical modelling in the Milan Region’, in P. M. Borrel and P. Borrel (eds), Proc. EUROTRAC Symp.' 98, WIT Press, Southampton, pp. 767–771.Google Scholar
  22. Rasmussen, A., Sørensen, J. H. and Nielsen, N. W.: 1997, ‘Validation of Mixing Height Determined from Vertical Profiles of Wind and Temperature from the DMI-HIRLAM NWP Model in Com-parison with Radiosoundings' in EURASAP Workshop Proc. on the Determination of the Mixing Height – Current Progress and Problems, Risø-R-997(EN), pp. 101–105.Google Scholar
  23. Rasmussen, A., Sørensen, J. H., Nielsen, N. W. and Amstrup, B.: 1999, Uncertainty of Meteorolo-gical Parameters from DMI-HIRLAM, RODOS(WG2)TN(99)12.Google Scholar
  24. Saito, K., Doms, G., Schaettler, U. and Steppeler, J.: 1998, ‘3-D Mountain Waves by the Lokal-Modell of DWD and the MRI Mesoscale Nonhydrostatic Model’, Met. a. Geophys. 49(1), 7–19.Google Scholar
  25. Sattler, K.: 1999, ‘New high resolution physiographic data and climate generation in the HIRLAM forecasting system at DMI, an overview’, HIRLAM Newsletter 33, 96–100.Google Scholar
  26. Scire, J. S., Insley, E. M., Yamartino, R. J. and Fernau, M. E.: 1995, A User's Guide for the CALMET Meteorological Model.Google Scholar
  27. Seaman, N. L.: 2000, ‘Meteorol. Model. for Air-quality Assessments’, Atm. Env. 34, 2231–2259.Google Scholar
  28. Silibello, C., Calori, G., Pirovano, G. and Carmichael, G. R.: 2001, ‘Development of STEM-FCM Modeling System: Chemical Mechanisms Sensitivity Evaluated on a Photochemical Episode’, in Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf, on Air Pollution Modell. a. Simul., Champs-sur-Marne (F), 9–12 April 2001.Google Scholar
  29. Sistla, G., Zhou, N., Hao, W., Ku, J. Y., Rao, S. T., Bornstein, R. and Freedman, F.: 1996, ‘Effects of uncertainties in meteorological inputs on urban airshed model predictions and ozone control strategies’, Atmosph. Environ. 30, 2011–2025.Google Scholar
  30. Sorteberg, A.: 2001, ‘The Sensitivity of Inversion Strength to the Formulation of the Non-dimensional Momentum and Heat Profiles’, Research Rep. No. 117, Norwegian Met. Inst., Oslo.Google Scholar
  31. Tana, H. and Bornstein, R.: 1999, ‘Urbanisation of Meteorological Models and Implications on Simulated Heat Islands and Air Quality’, in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Biometeorology and Urban Climatology at the Turn of the Millennium, Sydney, Australia, 8–12 November 1999, ICUC1.1.Google Scholar
  32. Zilitinkevich, S. and Baklanov, A.: 2001, ‘Calculation of the height of stable boundary layers in operational models’, Bound.-Layer Meteorol. (accepted).Google Scholar
  33. Zilitinkevich, S., Johansson, P.-E., Mironov, D. V. and Baklanov, A.: 1998, ‘A similarity-theory model for wind profile and resistance law in stably stratified planetary boundary layers’, J. Wind Engineer. Industr. Aerodyn. 74–76, 209–218.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Baklanov
  • Alix Rasmussen
  • Barbara Fay
    • 1
  • Erik Berge
    • 2
  • Sandro Finardi
    • 3
  1. 1.Germany
  2. 2.Norway
  3. 3.Italy

Personalised recommendations