Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 305–318 | Cite as

The March of the robot dogs

  • Robert Sparrow
Article

Abstract

Following the success of Sony Corporation's`AIBO,' robot cats and dogs are multiplyingrapidly. ``Robot pets'' employing sophisticatedartificial intelligence and animatronictechnologies are now being marketed as toys andcompanions by a number of large consumerelectronics corporations.

It is often suggested in popular writing aboutthese devices that they could play a worthwhilerole in serving the needs of an increasinglyaging and socially isolated population. Robotcompanions, shaped like familiar householdpets, could comfort and entertain lonely olderpersons. This goal is misguided and unethical. While there are a number of apparent benefitsthat might be thought to accrue from ownershipof a robot pet, the majority and the mostimportant of these are predicated on mistaking, at a conscious or unconscious level,the robot for a real animal. For an individualto benefit significantly from ownership of arobot pet they must systematically deludethemselves regarding the real nature of theirrelation with the animal. It requiressentimentality of a morally deplorable sort. Indulging in such sentimentality violates a(weak) duty that we have to ourselves toapprehend the world accurately. The design andmanufacture of these robots is unethical in sofar as it presupposes or encourages thisdelusion.

The invention of robot pets heralds thearrival of what might be called ``ersatzcompanions'' more generally. That is, ofdevices that are designed to engage in andreplicate significant social and emotionalrelationships. The advent of robot dogs offersa valuable opportunity to think about the worthof such companions, the proper place of robots in society and the value we should place on ourrelationships with them.

AIBO animals artificial intelligence ethics old age pets robots robot pets sentimentality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ruth F. Chadwick. Lucas Introna and Antonio Marturano, editors. Proceedings of the Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry 2001 Conference: IT and the Body. Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, December 14-16, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Stephen Clark. Animals and their Moral Standing. Routledge, London and New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Stephen Clark. The Political Animal: Biology, Ethics and Politics. Routledge, London and New York, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. D. Cockburn. Human Beings and Giant Squids. Philosophy, 69: 135–150, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. David Cockburn, editor. Human Beings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. J.M. Coetzee. The Lives of Animals. Profile Books, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. Daniel C. Dennett. When HAL Kills, Who's to Blame? Computer Ethics. In David G. Stork, editor, HAL's Legacy: 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality, pp. 351–365. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Cora Diamond. EatingMeat and Eating People. Philosophy, 53: 465–479, 1978.Google Scholar
  9. Cora Diamond. The Importance of Being Human. In David Cockburn, editor, Human Beings, pp. 35–62, at p. 44. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. L.L. Floridi and J.W. Sanders. Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics. In Deborah G. Johnson, James H. Moor and Herman Tavani, editors, Proceedings for Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry 2000, pp. 142–156. Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, July 14-16, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. Luciano Floridi and J.W. Sanders. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. In Ruth F. Chadwick, Lucas Introna and Antonio Marturano, editors, Proceedings of the Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry 2001 Conference: IT and the Body, pp. 84–107. Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, December 14-16, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. E. Friedmann and S.A. Thomas. Pet Ownership, Social Support, and One-Year Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). In C.C. Wilson and D.C. Turner, editors, Companion Animals in Human Health, pp. 187–201.Google Scholar
  13. K.M. Ford and C. Glymour et al., editors. Android Epistemology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1995.Google Scholar
  14. N. Frude. The Robot Heritage. Century Publishing, London, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. M. Fujita and H. Kitano. Development of an Autonomous Quadruped Robot for Robot Entertainment. Autonomous Robots, 5: 7–18, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. Raimond Gaita. Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception. MacMillan, London, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. Raimond Gaita. A Common Humanity. Text Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. James Gips. Towards the Ethical Robot. In K.M. Ford and C. Glymour et al., editors, Android Epistemology, pp. 243–252, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. G.M. Hall. The Age of Automation. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. Marc D. Hauser. Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think. Penguin, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. Bruce Headey. Health Benefits and Health Cost Savings Due to Pets: Preliminary Estimates from an Australian National Survey. Social Indicators Research, 47: 233–243, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. V. Hearne. Adam's Task: Calling Animals by Name. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
  23. Rosalind Hursthouse. Ethics, Humans and Other Animals: An Introduction with Readings. Routledge, London and New York, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. G.L.R. Jennings and C.M. Reid et al. Animals and Cardiovascular Health. In C.C. Wilson and D.C. Turner, editors, Companion Animals in Human Health, pp. 161–171.Google Scholar
  25. Deborah G. Johnson, James H. Moor and Herman Tavani, editors, Proceedings for Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry 2000. Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, July 14-16, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Yuri Kageyama. Nurse Gadget Patrols the Wards. The Age: 44. Melbourne, Australia, April 6, 2002.Google Scholar
  27. Irene M. Kunii. How much is that Robot in the Window? Business Week: Asian Edition: 22, November 27, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. P. Menzel and F. D'Aluisio. Robo Sapiens: Evolution of a New Species. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Jeffrey Masson and Susan McCarthy. When Elephants Weep: The Emotional Lives of Animals. Vintage, London, 1996.Google Scholar
  30. M. Midgely. Beast and Man. The Harvester Press, Hassocks, Sussex, 1978.Google Scholar
  31. Mary Midgely. Animals and Why They Matter. The University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia, 1983.Google Scholar
  32. Mary Midgely. Utopias, Dolphins, and Computers: Problems of Philosophical Plumbing. Routledge, London and New York, 1996.Google Scholar
  33. Thomas Nagel. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review, 83: 435–450, 1974.Google Scholar
  34. B. Rollin. The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  35. Roger Scruton. Animal Rights and Wrongs. Demos, London, 1996 extracted in Rosalind Hursthouse, Ethics, Humans and Other Animals: An Introduction with Readings: 209-228. Routledge, London and New York, 2000.Google Scholar
  36. Michael Slote. Agent-Based Virtue Ethics. Midwestern Studies in Philosophy, 20: 83–101, 1995.Google Scholar
  37. Geoff Simons. Robots: The Quest for Living Machines. Cassell, London, 1992.Google Scholar
  38. R. Sparrow. Artificial Intelligences, Embodiment and the ‘Turing Triage Test’. In Ruth F. Chadwick, Lucas Introna and Antonio Marturano, editors, Proceedings of the Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry 2001 Conference: IT and the Body. Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, December 14-16, 2001.Google Scholar
  39. David G. Stork, editor. HAL's Legacy: 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1997.Google Scholar
  40. Norbert Weiner. God and Golem Inc. Chapman & Hall, London, 1964.Google Scholar
  41. C.C. Wilson and D.C. Turner, editors. Companion Animals in Human Health. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Sparrow
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MelbourneVictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations