Hydrobiologia

, Volume 485, Issue 1–3, pp 199–203

The functional role of Gammarus(Crustacea, Amphipoda): shredders, predators, or both?

  • David W. Kelly
  • Jaimie T. A. Dick
  • W. Ian Montgomery
Article

Abstract

Gammarus spp. are traditionally viewed under the functional feeding group (FFG) concept as herbivorous `shredders'. Although recent studies suggest that Gammarus should also be viewed as predators, this latter role remains contentious. Here, in a laboratory experiment, we objectively examine the balance between shredder and predator roles in a common freshwater species. Gammarus pulex preyed significantly on mayfly nymph, Baetis rhodani, in both the presence and absence of excess leaf material. There was no significant difference in predation where the alternative food, that is, leaf material, was present as compared to absent. Also, G. pulex shredded leaf material in the presence and absence of B. rhodani. However, shredding was significantly reduced where alternative food, that is, B. rhodani prey, was present as compared to absent. Further, G. pulex had a clear leaf species preference. Our results suggest that Gammarus function as both predators and shredders, with the balance of the two roles perhaps depending on food availability and quality. We discuss implications for the use of the FFG concept in assessing freshwater processes, and the role that Gammarus predation may play in structuring macroinvertebrate communities.

functional feeding group Gammarus mayfly predators shredders 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cruz-Rivera, E. & M. E. Hay, 2000. Can quantity replace quality? Food choice, compensatory feeding and fitness of marine Mesograzers. Ecology 81: 201–219.Google Scholar
  2. Cummins, K. W. & M. J. Klug, 1979. Feeding Ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 10: 147–172.Google Scholar
  3. Dangles, O. J. & F. A. Guerold, 2000. Linking shredders and leaf processing: Insights from an acidic stream study. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 86: 395–406.Google Scholar
  4. Delong, M. D., R. B. Summers & J. H. Thorp, 1993. Influence of food type on the growth of a riverine amphipod, Gammarus fasciatus. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 50: 1891–1896.Google Scholar
  5. Dick, J. T. A., 1996. Post-invasion amphipod communities of Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland: influences of habitat selection and mutual predation. J. anim. Ecol. 65: 756–767.Google Scholar
  6. Dick, J. T. A. & D. Platvoet, 2000. Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 977–983.Google Scholar
  7. Dick, J. T. A., D. Platvoet & D. W. Kelly, 2002. Predatory impact of the freshwater invader, Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 59: 1048–1078.Google Scholar
  8. Gee, J. H. R., 1988. Population dynamics and morphometrics of Gammarus pulex (L.): evidence of seasonal food limitation in a freshwater detritivore. Freshwat. Biol. 19: 333–343.Google Scholar
  9. Graca, M. A. S., C. Cressa, M. O. Gessner, M. J. Feio, K. A. Callies & C. Barrios, 2001. Food quality, feeding preferences, survival and growth of shredders from temperate and tropical streams. Freshwat. Biol. 46: 947–957.Google Scholar
  10. Hildrew, A. G. & P. S. Giller, 1994. Patchiness, species interactions and distribution of the stream benthos. In Giller, P. S., A. G. Hildrew & D. G. Rafaelli (eds), Aquatic Ecology. Scale, Pattern and Process. University College Cork: 649 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Jonsson, M., B. Malmqvist & P. Hoffsten, 2001. Leaf litter breakdown rates in boreal streams: does shredder species richness matter? Freshwat. Biol. 46: 161–171.Google Scholar
  12. Karaman, G. S. & S. Pinkster, 1977. Freshwater Gammarus species from Europe, North Africa and adjacent regions of Asia (Crustacea-Amphipoda). Bijdr. Dierk 47: 1–97.Google Scholar
  13. Kelly, D.W., J. T. A. Dick & W. I. Montgomery, 2002. Predation on mayfly nymph, Baetis rhodani, by native and introduced Gammarus spp. (Amphipoda): direct effects and the facilitation of predation by salmonids. Freshwat. Biol. 47: 1257–1268.Google Scholar
  14. MacNeil, C., J. T. A. Dick & R. W. Elwood, 1997. The trophic ecology of freshwater Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda): Problems and perspectives concerning the functional feeding group concept. Biol. Rev. 72: 349–364.Google Scholar
  15. MacNeil, C., W. I. Montgomery, J. T. A. Dick & R. W. Elwood, 2001. Factors influencing the distribution of native and introduced Gammarus spp. in Irish river systems. Arch. Hydrobiol. 151: 353–368.Google Scholar
  16. Mihuc, T. B., 1997. The functional trophic role of lotic primary consumers: generalist versus specialist strategies. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 466–462.Google Scholar
  17. Murphy, J. & P. S. Giller, 2000. Seasonal dynamics of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the benthos and associated with detritus packs in two low order streams with different riparian vegetation. Freshwat. Biol. 43: 617–631.Google Scholar
  18. Otto, C., 1998. Factors affecting the disjunct distribution of amphipods along a North Swedish river. Oikos 83: 21–28.Google Scholar
  19. Pockl, M., 1995. Laboratory studies on growth, feeding, moulting and mortality in the freshwater amphipods Gammarus fossarum and G. roeseli. Arch. Hydrobiol. 134: 223–253.Google Scholar
  20. Rawer-Jost, C., J. Bohmer, J. Blank & H. Rahmann, 2000. Macroinvertebrate functional feeding group methods in ecological assessment. Hydrobiologia 422: 225–232.Google Scholar
  21. Resh, V. H., R. H. Norris & M. T. Barbour, 1995. Design and implementation of rapid assessment approaches for water resource monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. Aust. J. Ecol. 20: 108–121.Google Scholar
  22. Savage, A. A., 2000. Community structure during a 27 year study of the macroinvertberate fauna of a chemically unstable lake. Hydrobiologia 421: 115–127.Google Scholar
  23. Sih, A. & D. E. Wooster, 1994. Prey behaviour, prey dispersal, and predator impacts on stream prey. Ecology 75: 1199–1207.Google Scholar
  24. Sokal, R. R. & F. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry. Freeman.Google Scholar
  25. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.Google Scholar
  26. Vassallo, L. & D. H. Steele, 1980. Survival and growth of young Gammarus lawrencianus Bousfield, 1956, on different diets. Crustaceana (Suppl.) 6: 118–125.Google Scholar
  27. Willoughby, L. G. & D.W. Sutcliffe, 1976. Experiments on feeding and growth of the amphipod Gammarus pulex (L.) related to its distribution in the River Duddon. Freshwat. Biol. 6: 577–586.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Kelly
    • 1
  • Jaimie T. A. Dick
    • 1
  • W. Ian Montgomery
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biology and BiochemistryQueen's University Belfast, Medical Biology CentreBelfastN. Ireland, U.K

Personalised recommendations