Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 81, Issue 1–3, pp 107–117 | Cite as

A Proposed Coast-Wide Reference Monitoring System for Evaluating Wetland Restoration Trajectories in Louisiana

  • Gregory D. Steyer
  • Charles E. Sasser
  • Jenneke M. Visser
  • Erick M. Swenson
  • John A. Nyman
  • Richard C. Raynie
Article

Abstract

Wetland restoration efforts conducted in Louisiana under the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act require monitoring the effectiveness of individual projects as well as monitoring the cumulative effects of all projects in restoring, creating, enhancing, and protecting the coastal landscape. The effectiveness of the traditional paired-reference monitoring approach in Louisiana has been limited because of difficulty in finding comparable reference sites. A multiple reference approach is proposed that uses aspects of hydrogeomorphic functional assessments and probabilistic sampling. This approach includes a suite of sites that encompass the range of ecological condition for each stratum, with projects placed on a continuum of conditions found for that stratum. Trajectories in reference sites through time are then compared with project trajectories through time. Plant community zonation complicated selection of indicators, strata, and sample size. The approach proposed could serve as a model for evaluating wetland ecosystems.

monitoring wetland restoration Louisiana reference HGM 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brinson, M. M.: 1993, ‘A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands’, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4.Google Scholar
  2. Brinson, M. M., Kruczynski, W., Lee, L. C., Nutter, W. L., Smith, R. D. and Whigham, D. F.: 1994, ‘Developing an Approach for Assessing the Functions of Wetlands’, in: Mitsch, W. J. (ed), Global Wetlands: Old World and New, Elsevier Science, NY, pp. 615–624.Google Scholar
  3. Brinson, M. M. and Rheinhardt, R.: 1996, ‘The Role of Reference Wetlands in Functional Assessment and Mitigation’, Ecological Applications 6, 69–76.Google Scholar
  4. Chabreck, R. H.: 1972, ‘Vegetation, Water, and Soil Characteristics of the Louisiana Coastal Region’, Louisiana State University, Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 664.Google Scholar
  5. Chabreck, R. H. and Linscombe, J.: 1997, ‘Vegetation Type Map of the Louisiana Coastal Marshes’, New Orleans, LA, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.Google Scholar
  6. Crowley, P. H.: 1992, ‘Resampling Methods for Computation Intensive Data Analysis in Ecology and Evolution’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 405–447.Google Scholar
  7. Green, R. H.: 1979, Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists, Wiley Interscience, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  8. Leibowitz, N. C., Squires, L. and Baker, J. P.: 1991, Research Plan for Monitoring Wetland Ecosystems, EPA/600/3–91/010, Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  9. Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force (LCWCRTF): 1997, ‘The 1997 Evaluation Report to the U.S. Congress on the Effectiveness of Louisiana Coastal Wetland Restoration Projects’, Baton Rouge, LA, 76 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force (LCWCRTF): 1998, ‘Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana’, Baton Rouge, LA, 161 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Malaeb, Z. A.: 1997, ‘CWPPRA Sample Size Determination and Sampling Design Issues’, 2 Volume Report to Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
  12. Novitzki, R. P.: 1994, ‘EMAP-Wetlands: A Program for Assessing Wetland Condition’, in: Mitsch, W. J. (ed), Global Wetlands: Old World and New, Elsevier Science, NY, pp. 691–709.Google Scholar
  13. Steyer, G. D., Raynie, R. C., Steller, D. L., Fuller, D. and Swenson, E.: 1995, ‘Quality Management Plan for Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act Monitoring Program’, Open-file Report 95–01, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Restoration Division, Baton Rouge, 97 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Thornton, K. W., Saul, G. E. and Hyatt, D. E.: 1994, ‘Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Assessment Framework’, EPA/620/R-94/016, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EMAP Center, Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
  15. Underwood, A. J.: 1991, ‘Beyond BACI: Experimental Designs for Detecting Human Environmental Impacts on Temporal Variation in Natural Populations’, Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Restoration 42, 569–587.Google Scholar
  16. Underwood, A. J.: 1992, ‘Beyond BACI: The Detection of Environmental Impacts on Populations in the Real, but Variable World’, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 161, 145–178.Google Scholar
  17. Underwood, A. J.: 1994, ‘On Beyond BACI: Sampling Designs that Might Reliably Detect Environmental Disturbances’, Ecological Applications 41, 3–15.Google Scholar
  18. Visser, J. M. and Sasser, C. E.: 1998, ‘1997 Coastal Vegetation Analysis’, Report to Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory D. Steyer
    • 1
  • Charles E. Sasser
    • 2
  • Jenneke M. Visser
    • 2
  • Erick M. Swenson
    • 2
  • John A. Nyman
    • 3
  • Richard C. Raynie
    • 4
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyNational Wetlands Research CenterBaton RougeU.S.A
  2. 2.Louisiana State University Coastal Ecology InstituteBaton RougeU.S.A
  3. 3.Wildlife and FisheriesLouisiana State University School of ForestryBaton RougeU.S.A
  4. 4.Louisiana Department of Natural ResourcesBaton RougeU.S.A

Personalised recommendations