Aquaculture International

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 109–121 | Cite as

Enzyme producing bacterial flora isolated from fish digestive tracts

  • Abhinanda Bairagi
  • Keka Sarkar Ghosh
  • Sukanta Kumar Sen
  • Arun Kumar Ray
Article

Abstract

Isolationand enumeration of aerobic bacterial flora in the gastrointestinal tract of nineculturable freshwater teleosts, namely catla, rohu, mrigal, silver carp, grasscarp, common carp, tilapia, walking catfish and murrel have been carried out.Amylolytic, cellulolytic, lipolytic and proteolytic microflora were identifiedfrom the culture plate using selective media. The isolates were qualitativelyscreened on the basis of their extracellular enzyme producing ability. Theselected strains were further quantitatively assayed for amylase, cellulase,lipase and protease activities. Protease activity was exhibited by almost allthe bacterial isolates, while strains isolated from tilapia, grass carp andcommon carp showed considerable amylolytic and cellulolytic activities. Maximumactivity of lipase was exhibited by a strain isolated from silver carp. Thestudy indicates that there is a distinct microbial source of the digestiveenzymes – amylase, cellulase, lipase and protease, apart from endogenoussources in fish gut. The information generated from the present investigationmight contribute towards better feed formulations for carp at low cost,incorporating the enzyme producing bacterial isolates as probiotics.

Freshwater teleosts Intestinal microorganisms Microbial enzyme activity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Hussaini A.H. 1949. On the functional morphology of the alimentary tract of some fish in relation to differences in their feeding habits: cytology and morphology. Quartarly Journal of Microscopical Science 90: 323–354.Google Scholar
  2. Barnard E.A. 1973. Comparative biochemistry and physiology of digestion. In: Prosser C.L. (ed.), Comparative Animal Physiology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 133–164.Google Scholar
  3. Barrington E.J.W. 1957. The alimentary canal and digestion. In: Brown M.E. (ed.), The Physiology of Fishes. Vol. I. Academic Press, New York, pp. 109–161.Google Scholar
  4. Bernfield P. 1955. In: Colowick S.P. and Kaplan N.O (eds), Methods of Enzymology. Vol. I. Academic Press, New York, p. 149.Google Scholar
  5. Beveridge M.C.M., Sikdar P.K., Frerichs G.N. and Millar S. 1991. The ingestion of bacteria in suspension by the common carp Cyprinus carpio L. Journal of Fish Biology 39: 825–831.Google Scholar
  6. Bitterlich G. 1985. Digestive enzyme pattern of two stomachless filter feeders, silvercarp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix Val., and bighead carp, Aristichthys nobilis Rich. Journal of Fish Biology 27: 103–112.Google Scholar
  7. Bondi A. and Spannhof A. 1954. Action of the digestive enzymes of the carp. British Journal of Nutrition 8: 240–246.Google Scholar
  8. Chiu Y.N. and Benitez L.V. 1981. Studies on the carbohydrates in the digestive tract of the milkfish, Chanos chanos. Marine Biology 61: 247–254.Google Scholar
  9. Colowick S.P. and Kaplan N.O. 1955. In: Colowick S.P. and Kaplan N.O (eds), Methods of Enzymology. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, p. 627.Google Scholar
  10. Crosby N.D. and Reid R.G.B. 1971. Relationships between food, phylogeny and cellulose digestion in the Bivalvia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 49: 617–622.Google Scholar
  11. Dabrowski K. and Glogowski J. 1977. Studies on the role of exogenous proteolytic enzymes in digestion processes in fish. Hydrobiologia 54: 129–134.Google Scholar
  12. Das K.M. and Tripathi S.D. 1991. Studies on the digestive enzymes of grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Val.). Aquaculture 92: 21–32.Google Scholar
  13. Dhage K.P. 1968. Studies of the digestive enzymes in the three species of the major carps of India. Journal of Biological Sciences 11: 63–74.Google Scholar
  14. Fish G.K. 1951. Digestion in Tilapia esculenta. Nature 167: 900–901.Google Scholar
  15. Fish G.K. 1960. Comparative activity of some digestive enzymes in the alimentary canal of tilapia and perch. Hydrobiologia 15: 161–178.Google Scholar
  16. Gildberg A., Mikkelsen H., Sandaker and Ringo E. 1997. Probiotic effect of lactic acid bacteria in the feed on growth and survival of fry of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Hydrobiologia 352: 279–285.Google Scholar
  17. Jacob M.B. and Gerstein M.J. 1960. Handbook of microbiology. D Van Nostrand Co. Inc. Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  18. Kitamikado M. and Tachino S. 1960. Studies on digestive enzymes of rainbow trout. I. Carbohydrases. Bulletin of the Japanese Society for Scientific Fisheries 26: 679–684.Google Scholar
  19. Kawai S. and Ikeda S. 1972. Studies on digestive enzymes of fishes. II. Effect of dietary change on the activities of digestive enzymes in carp intestine. Bulletin of the Japanese Society for Scientific Fisheries 38: 265–270.Google Scholar
  20. Lesel R., Fromageot C. and Lesel M. 1986. Cellulose digestibility in grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella and in goldfish, Carassius auratus. Aquaculture 54: 11–17.Google Scholar
  21. Lesel R. 1991. Does a digestive active bacterial flora exist in fish? In: Fish Nutrition in Practice. Biarritz, France, pp. 655–664, 1993.Google Scholar
  22. Lindsay G.J.H. and Harris J.E. 1980. Carboxymethylcellulase activity in the digestive tracts of fish. Journal of fish Biology 16: 219–233.Google Scholar
  23. Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L. and Randall R.J. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193: 265–275.Google Scholar
  24. Migita M. and Hashimoto Y. 1949. On the digestion of higher carbohydrates by Zsuanhi (Ctenopharyngodon idella Cuv. And Val.). Bulletin of the Japanese Society for Scientific Fisheries 15: 259–261.Google Scholar
  25. Phillips A.M. 1969. Nutrition, digestion and energy utilization. In: Hoar W.S. and Randall D.J. (eds), Fish Physiology. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 391–432.Google Scholar
  26. Prejs A. and Blaszcyk M. 1977. Relationships between food and cellulase activity in freshwater fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 11: 447–452.Google Scholar
  27. Rahmatullah S.M. and Beveridge M.C.M. 1993. Ingestion of bacteria in suspension by Indian major carps (Catla catla, Labeo rohita) and Chinese carps (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Aristichthys nobilis). Hydrobiologia 264: 79–84.Google Scholar
  28. Ringo E., Strom E. and Tabachek J.A. 1995. Intestinal microflora of salmonids: a review. Aquaculture Research 26: 773–789.Google Scholar
  29. Sadasivam S. and Manickam A. 1996. Biochemical Methods. New Age International (P) Ltd. Publishers, pp. 126–128.Google Scholar
  30. Saha A.K. and Ray A.K. 1998. Cellulase activity in rohu fingerlings. Aquaculture International 6: 281–291.Google Scholar
  31. Sangiliyandi G. and Gunasekeran P. 1996. Extracellular lipase producing Bacillus licheniformis from an oil mill refinery effluent. Indian Journal of Microbiology 36: 109–110.Google Scholar
  32. Sarbahi D.S. 1951. Studies on the digestive enzymes of goldfish Carassius auratus (Linn.) and large mouth black bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacepede). Biological Bulletin 100: 244–257.Google Scholar
  33. Shcherbina M.A., Trofimova L.N. and Kazlaskene O.P. 1976. The activity of protease and the intensity of protein absorption with the introduction of different quantities of fat into the food of the carp Cyprinus carpio. Journal of Ichthyology 16: 632–636.Google Scholar
  34. Shcherbina M.A. and Kazlawlene O.P. 1971. The reaction of the medium and the rate of absorption of nutrients in the intestine of carp. Journal of Ichthyology 11: 81–85.Google Scholar
  35. Stavric S. and Kornegay T. 1995. Microbial probiotics for pigs and poultry. In: Wallace R.J. and Chesson A. (eds), Biotechnlogy in Animal Feeds and Animal Feeding. Weinheim, New York, pp. 205–231.Google Scholar
  36. Stickney R.R. 1975. Cellulase activity in the stomachs of freshwater fishes from Texas. Proceedings of Southeast Association of Game Fish Commision 29: 282–287.Google Scholar
  37. Stickney R.R. and Shumway S.E. 1974. Occurrence of cellulase activity in the stomachs of fish. Journal of Fish Biology 6: 779–790.Google Scholar
  38. Trust T.J. and Sparrow R.A.H. 1974. The bacterial flora in the alimentary tract of freshwater salmonid fishes. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 20: 1219–1228.Google Scholar
  39. Walter H.E. 1984. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, p. 238.Google Scholar
  40. Yokoe Y. and Yasumasu I. 1964. The distribution of cellulase in invertebrates. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 13: 223–238.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abhinanda Bairagi
    • 1
  • Keka Sarkar Ghosh
    • 1
  • Sukanta Kumar Sen
    • 2
  • Arun Kumar Ray
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyVisva-Bharati University, Fish Nutrition LaboratorySantiniketanIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyVisva-Bharati University, Microbiology LaboratorySantiniketanIndia

Personalised recommendations