Sex Roles

, Volume 47, Issue 5–6, pp 289–293 | Cite as

But She Was Unfaithful: Benevolent Sexism and Reactions to Rape Victims Who Violate Traditional Gender Role Expectations

  • G. Tendayi Viki
  • Dominic Abrams
Article

Abstract

The role of benevolent sexism (BS) in accounting for victim blame in an acquaintance rape case was investigated. Participants were presented with vignettes that described an acquaintance rape. Control condition participants were given no descriptive information about the victim, whereas in the “cheating” condition the victim was described as a “married woman.” As predicted, participants who scored high in BS attributed more blame to the acquaintance rape victim who was assaulted during an act of infidelity than to a victim in similar circumstances whose marital status was unknown. These findings complement those of other research (Abrams, Viki, Masser, & Bohner, in press), which indicate that individuals high in BS are more likely to react negatively to rape victims who can be viewed as violating social norms concerning appropriate conduct for women.

benevolent sexism hostile sexism rape victim blame 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (in press). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance and stranger rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Google Scholar
  2. Bohner, G., Reinhard, M., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257–268.Google Scholar
  3. Bohner, G., & Schwarz, N. (1996). The threat of rape: Its psychological impact on non-victimized women. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 162–175). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports of rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.Google Scholar
  5. Cassidy, L., & Hurell, R. M. (1995). The influence of victim's attire on adolescents' judgments of date rape. Adolescence, 30, 319–324.Google Scholar
  6. Corcoran, K. J., & Thomas, L. R. (1991). The influence of observed alcohol consumption on perceptions of initiation of sexual activity in a college dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 500–507.Google Scholar
  7. Costin, F. (1985). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 319–325.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, G. J. (1986). College student attitudes toward forcible rape: I. Cognitive predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 457–466.Google Scholar
  9. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.Google Scholar
  10. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mlandinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as a simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, K. K. P. (1995). Attributions about date rape: Impact of clothing, sex, money spent, date type, and perceived similarity. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23, 292–311.Google Scholar
  12. Krahé, B. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 50–58.Google Scholar
  13. L'Armand, K., & Pepitone, A. (1982). Judgments of rape: A study of victim-rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 134–139.Google Scholar
  14. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.Google Scholar
  15. Luginbuhl, J., & Mulin, C. (1981). Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed? Sex Roles, 7, 547–559.Google Scholar
  16. Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: The relationships among hostility, benevolence, and neosexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 503–517.Google Scholar
  17. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Tendayi Viki
    • 1
  • Dominic Abrams
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Kent at CanterburyCanterburyUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations