Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 24, Issue 1–2, pp 49–63 | Cite as

Prozac and the Post-human Politics of Cyborgs

Article

Abstract

Working through the lens of Donna Haraway's cyborg theory and directed at the example of Prozac, I address the dramatic rise of new technoscience in medicine and psychiatry. Haraway's cyborg theory insists on a conceptualization and a politics of technoscience that does not rely on universal “Truths” or universal “Goods” and does not attempt to return to the “pure” or the “natural.” Instead, Haraway helps us mix politics, ethics, and aesthetics with science and scientific recommendations, and she helps us understand that (without recourse to universal truth or universal good) questions of legitimacy in science come down to local questions of effect and inclusion. What, in the case of my example, are the effects of Prozac? And for whom? Who is included and empowered to create legitimate psychiatric knowledge? Who is excluded and why? And, what political strategies will increase the democratic health of psychiatric science and practice?

Prozac cyborgs science studies Haraway technoscience depression politics post-human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baudrillard, J. (1988). Consumer society. In M. Poster (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings (pp. 29–57). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Better than well. (1996, April 6). Economist, 87–89.Google Scholar
  3. Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Breggin, P. (1991). Toxic psychiatry: Why therapy, empathy, and love must replace the drugs, electroshock, and biochemical theories of the New Psychiatry. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  5. Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability, oppression, and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordin (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 109–134). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  8. Grossberg, L. (1997). Bringing it all back home. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (Eds.). (1995). Posthuman bodies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, S. (1993). Encoding, decoding. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (pp. 60–103). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_witness@second millennium. FemaleMan_meets_oncomouse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hess, D. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hyman, S., Arana, G., & Rosenbaum, J. (1995). Handbook of psychiatric drug therapy. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Kleinman, A. (1988). Rethinking psychiatry: From cultural category to personal experience. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kramer, P. (1997). Listening to Prozac. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Eli Lilly, (1998, January 28). Eli Lilly Company NewsGoogle Scholar
  20. Mauro, J. (1994, July–August). And Prozac for all. Psychology Today, 27, 44–52.Google Scholar
  21. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rifkin, J. (1998). The biotech century: Harnessing the gene and remaking the world. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  23. Rorty, R. (1982). The consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ross, A. (1996a). Cultural studies and the challenge of science. In C. Nelson, & D. P. Gaonkar (Eds.), Disciplinarity and dissent in cultural studies (pp. 171–184). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Ross, A. (Ed.). (1996b). Science wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophcially. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Silverman, E. (1997, February 16). Depression drugs lead prescription sales list. Tribune Business News, 216.Google Scholar
  29. Traweek, S. (1993). An introduction to the cultural and social studies of sciences and technologies. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 17, 3–25.Google Scholar
  30. Traweek, S. (1996). Unity, dyads, triads, quads, and complexity: Cultural choreographies of science. In A. Ross (Ed.), Science wars (pp. 139–150). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Treichler, P. (1988). AIDS, homophobia, and biomedical discourse. In D. Crimp (Ed.), AIDS: Cultural analysis/cultural activism (pp. 31–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Weil, A. (1995). Spontaneous healing. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations