Advertisement

Adsorption

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 171–188 | Cite as

A Branched Pore Model Analysis for the Adsorption of Acid Dyes on Activated Carbon

  • Danny C.K. Ko
  • John F. Porter
  • Gordon McKayEmail author
Article

Abstract

A new branched-pore adsorption model has been developed using an external mass transfer coefficient, Kf, an effective diffusivity, Deff, a lumped micropore diffusion rate parameter, Kb, and the fraction of macropores, f, to describe sorption kinetic data from initial adsorbent-adsorbate contact to the long-term adsorption phase. This model has been applied to an environmental pollution problem—the removal of two dyes, Acid Blue 80 (AB80) and Acid Red 114 (AR114), by sorption on activated carbon. A computer program has been used to generate theoretical concentration-time curves and the four mass transfer kinetic parameters adjusted so that the model achieves a close fit to the experimental data. The best fit values of the parameters have been determined for different initial dye concentrations and carbon masses. Since the model is specifically applicable to fixed constant values of these four parameters, a further and key application of this project is to see if single constant values of these parameters can be used to describe all the experimental concentration-time decay curves for one dye-carbon system.

The error analysis and best fit approach to modeling the decay curves for both dye systems show that the correlation between experimental and theoretical data is good for the fixed values of the four fitted parameters. A significantly better fit of the model predictions is obtained when Kf, Kb and f are maintained constant but Deff is varied. This indicates that the surface diffusivity may vary as a function of surface coverage.

adsorption model acid dye activated carbon macropore micropore variable surface diffusivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, S.J., P. Brown, G. McKay, and O. Flynn, “An Evaluation of Single Resistance Transfers Models in the Sorption of Metal Ions by Peat,” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 54, 271-276 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. Crank, J. and P. Nicolson, “A Practical Method for Numerical Evaluation of Solutions of Partial Differential Equations of the Heat-Conduction Type,” Math. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 43, 50-67 (1947).Google Scholar
  3. Crittenden, J.C. and W.J. Weber, Jr., “Predictive Model for Design of Fixed-Bed Adsorbers: Parameter Estimation and Model Development,” ASCE J. Env. Eng. Div., 104(2), 185-197 (1978a).Google Scholar
  4. Crittenden, J.C. and W.J. Weber, Jr., “Predictive Model for Design of Fixed-Bed Adsorbers: Single-Component Model Verification,” ASCE J. Env. Eng. Div., 104 (3), 433-443 (1978b).Google Scholar
  5. Darken, L.S., “Diffusion, Mobility and their Interrelation through Free Energy in Binary Metallic Systems,” Trans. of Amer. Inst. of Min. Eng., 175, 184-201 (1948).Google Scholar
  6. Dedrick, R.L. and R.B. Beckmann, “Pore and Solid Diffusion Models for Batch Adsorbers,” Chem. Eng. Progr. Symp. Ser., 63(74), 68-81 (1967).Google Scholar
  7. DiGiano, F.A. and W.J. Weber, Jr., “Sorption Kinetics in Finite-Bath Systems,” ASCE J. Env. Eng. Div., 98(SA6), 1021-1036 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. Do, D.D. Adsorption Analysis: Equilibria and Kinetics, Imperial College Press, London, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Edeskuty, F.J. and N.R. Amundson, “Effects of Intraparticle Diffusion in Agitated Static Systems,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 44, 1968 (1952).Google Scholar
  10. Famularo, J., J.A. Mueller, and A.S. Pannu, “Prediction of Carbon Column Performance from Pure Solute Data,” J. Wat. Poll. Contr. Fed., 52(7), 2019-2032 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. Gilliland, E., R.F. Baddour, G.P. Perkinson K.J. Sladek, “Diffusion on Surfaces. I. Effect of Concentration on the Diffusivity of Physically Adsorbed Gases,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 13(2), 95-100 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. Glueckauf, E., “Formulas for Diffusion in Spheres and their Applications,” Trans. Faraday Soc., 51, 1540-1552 (1955).Google Scholar
  13. Griffin, R.P. and J.S. Dranoff, “Rate of Glycerol Adsorption by Ion Exchange Resins,” AlChE J., 9, 283-291 (1963).Google Scholar
  14. Hsieh, J.S., R.M. Turian, and C. Tien, “Experimental Investigation of the Adsorption of Organic Contaminants in Waste Water on Granular Activated Carbon,” Research Report Number RR-69-1, Fed. Water Poll. Control Admin., U.S. Department of Interior, 1969.Google Scholar
  15. Hu, X., “Multicomponent Adsorption Equilibrium of Gases in Zeolites: Effect of Pore Size Distribution,” Chem. Eng. Comm., 174, 201-214 (1999).Google Scholar
  16. Hu, X., S. Qiao, and D.D. Do, “Multicomponent Adsorption Kinetics of Gases in Activated Carbon: Effect of Pore Size Distribution,” Langmuir, 15, 6428-6437 (1999).Google Scholar
  17. Jury, S.H., “Improved Version of the Rate Equation for Molecular Diffusion in a Dispersed Phase,” AIChE J., 13, 1124-1135 (1967).Google Scholar
  18. Kasten, P.R. and N.R. Amundson, “Effect of Intraparticle Diffusion: Analytical Solution for Simple Systems in Moving-Bed Adsorbes,” Ind. Eng. Chem., 44(7), 1704-1715 (1952).Google Scholar
  19. Keinath, T.M. and W.J. Weber, Jr., Tech. Pub., Res. Proj. No. W.P. 00706, Fed. Water Poll. Control Admin., U.S. Department of Interior, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, M.C., W.E. Thacker, V.L. Snoeyink, and J.C. Crittenden, “Mathematical Modeling of Humic Substances Removal with Activated Carbon Beds,” ASCE Environmental Engineering Conference Proceedings, pp. 387-393 (1980).Google Scholar
  21. Mathews, A.P. and W.J. Weber, Jr., “Effects of External Mass Transfer and Intraparticle Diffusion on Adsorption Rates in Slurry Reactors,” AIChE Symp. Ser., 73, 166 (1976).Google Scholar
  22. McKay, G., “Analytical Solution Using a Pore Diffusion Model for a Pseudo Irreversible Isotherm for the Adsorption of Basic Dye on Silica,” AIChE J., 30(4), 692-697 (1984a).Google Scholar
  23. McKay, G., “The Adsorption of Basic Dye onto Silica from Aqueous Solutions-Solid Diffusion Model,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 39, 129-138 (1984b).Google Scholar
  24. McKay, G., S. McKee, and H.R.J. Walters, “Solid-Liquid Adsorption Based on External Mass Transfer, Macropore and Micropore Diffusion,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 42(5), 1145-1151 (1987).Google Scholar
  25. Min, Y.H, K.S. Lee, C.S. Yoon, and L.M. Do, “Surface Morphology Study of Corona-Poled Thin Films Derived from Sol-Gel Processed Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Materials for Photonics Applications,” J. Materials Chem., 8(5), 1225-1232 (1998).Google Scholar
  26. Miyahara, M. and M. Okazaki, “Concentration Dependence of Surface Diffusivity of Nitrobenzene and Benzonitrile in Liquid Phase Adsorption onto an Activated Carbon,” J. Chem. Eng. Japan, 25, 408-414 (1992).Google Scholar
  27. Muraki, M., Y. Iwashima, and T. Hayakawa, “Rate of Liquid-Phase Adsorption on Activated Carbon in the Stirred Tank,” J. Chem. Eng. Japan, 15(1), 34-39 (1982).Google Scholar
  28. NAG, The NAG Fortran Library Introductory Guide, Mark 16, The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd., 1993.Google Scholar
  29. Neretnieks, I., “Analysis of Some Adsorption Experiments with Activated Carbon,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 31(11), 1029-1035 (1976).Google Scholar
  30. Peel, R.G., A. Benedek, and C.M. Crowe, “A Branched Pore Kinetic Model for Activated Carbon Adsorption,” AIChE J., 27(1), 26-31 (1981).Google Scholar
  31. Spahn, H. and E.U. Schlunder, “Scale-up of Activated Carbon Columns for Water Purification, Based on Results from Batch Tests: 1. Theoretical and Experimental Determination of Adsorption Rates of Single Organic Solutes in Batch Tests,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 30, 529-537 (1975).Google Scholar
  32. Suzuki, M. and T. Fujii, “Concentration Dependence of Surface Diffusion Coefficient of Propionic Acid in Activated Carbon Particles,” AIChE J., 28(3), 380-385 (1982).Google Scholar
  33. Thacker, W.E., V.L. Snoeyink, and J.C. Crittenden, “Modeling of Activated Carbon and Coal Gasification Char Adsorbents in Single Solute and Bi-Solute Systems,” University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Water Resources Center, Research Report 0 (161), pp. 1-166, 1981.Google Scholar
  34. Tien, C., Adsorption Calculations and Modelling, Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton MA, 1994.Google Scholar
  35. Weber, T.W. and R.K. Chakravorti, “Pore and Solid Diffusion Models for Fixed-Bed Adsorbers,” AIChE J., 20(2), 228-238 (1974).Google Scholar
  36. Weber, W.J., Jr. and S. Liang, “Dual Particle-Diffusion Model for Porous Adsorbents in Fixed Beds,” Env. Progr., 2(3), 167-175 (1983).Google Scholar
  37. Weber, W.J., Jr. and K.T. Liu, “Determination of Mass Transport Parameters for Fixed-Bed Adsorbers,” Chem. Eng. Comm., 6, 49-60 (1980).Google Scholar
  38. Wild, K.A., Multicomponent Adsorption Column Parameter Studies in Activated Carbon Adsorption, Vol. I, I.H. Suffet and M.J. McGuire (Eds.), p. 251, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor MI, 1980.Google Scholar
  39. Yang, X.Y. and B. Al-Duri, “Application of Branched Pore Diffusion Model in the Adsorption of Reactive Dyes on Activated Carbon,” Chem. Eng. J., 83, 15-23 (2001).Google Scholar
  40. Yiacoumi, S. and C. Tien, Kinetics of Metal Ion Adsorption from Aqueous Solutions, Kluwer Academic, Boston MA, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyClear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SARPeoples' Republic of China

Personalised recommendations