Political Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 151–170 | Cite as

Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification

  • Christopher H. Achen


This article constructs a rational choice model of the intergenerational transmission of party identification. At a given time, identification with a party is the estimate of average future benefits from candidates of that party. Experienced voters constantly update this expectation using political events since the last realignment to predict the future in accordance with Bayes Rule. New voters, however, have no experience of their own. In Bayesian terms, they need prior beliefs. It turns out that under certain specified conditions, these young voters should rationally choose to employ parental experience to help orient themselves to politics. The resulting model predicts several well–known features of political socialization, including the strong correlation between parents' and children's partisanship, the greater partisan independence of young voters, and the tendency of partisan alignments to decay.

socialization party identification political parties party systems Bayesian retrospective voting 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achen, Christopher H. (1992). Social psychology, demographic variables, and linear regression: breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior 14, 3 (September): 195–211.Google Scholar
  2. Bartels, Larry M. (1993). Messages received. American Political Science Review 41, 2 (April): 641–674.Google Scholar
  3. Bartels, Larry M. (2001a). A generational model of political learning. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September.Google Scholar
  4. Bartels, Larry M. (2001b). Beyond the running tally. Presented at the Parties and Partisanship Conference, Vanderbilt University, October 25-27.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1980). The American Voter (Midway Reprint). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1960)Google Scholar
  6. Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In David E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Converse, Philip E. (1969). Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies 2: 139–71.Google Scholar
  8. Converse, Philip E., and Pierce, Roy (1985). Measuring partisanship. Political Methodology 11, 3-4: 143–166.Google Scholar
  9. Converse, Philip E., and Pierce, Roy (1986). Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  11. Easton, David, and Dennis, Jack (1969). Children in the Political System. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Fiorina, Morris (1981). Retrospective Voting in American Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Flanigan, William H., Rahn, Wendy M., and Zingale, Nancy (1989). Political parties as objects of identification and orientation. Presented at the Western Political Science annual meeting, Salt Lake City, March.Google Scholar
  14. Franklin, Charles H. (1984). Issue preferences, socialization, and the evolution of party identification.” American Journal of Political Science 28, 3 (August): 459–478.Google Scholar
  15. Franklin, Charles H., and Jackson, John E. (1983). The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review 77: 957–973.Google Scholar
  16. Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald P. (1998). Rational learning and partisan attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 42, 3 (July): 794–818.Google Scholar
  17. Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Greenstein, Fred I. (1969). Children and Politics (revised edition). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hess, Robert D., and Torney, Judith V. (1968). The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, John E. (1975a). Issues, party choices and presidential votes. American Journal of Political Science 19: 161–185.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, John E. (1975b). Issues and party alignment. In Louis Maisel and Paul M. Sacks (eds.), The Future of Political Parties pp. 101–123. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G. (1981). Generations and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Johnston, Richard (1988). Paper presented at the 1988 meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  24. Kershaw, Ian (1983). Popular Opinion and Political Dissent in the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Key, V. O. (1959). Secular realignment and the party system. Journal of Politics 21: 198–210.Google Scholar
  26. Key, V. O. (1966). The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  27. Kramer, Gerald (1988). Political science as science.” In Herb Weisberg, ed. Political Science: The Science of Politics pp. 11–23. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, Warren E., and Shanks, J. Merrill (1996). The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sears, David O. (1975). Political Socialization. In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science (vol. 2), pp. 93–136. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. Shively, W. Phillips (1980). The nature of party identification: a review of recent developments. In John C. Pierce and John L. Sullivan (eds.), The Electorate Reconsidered pp. 219–236. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Trevor, Margaret C. (1999). Political socialization, party identification, and the gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly 63, 1 (Spring): 62–89.Google Scholar
  32. Weisberg, Herbert F. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior 2: 33–60.Google Scholar
  33. Zechman, Martin J. (1979). Dynamic models of the voter's decision calculus. Public Choice 34, 3-4: 297–315.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher H. Achen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Social Research—Center for Political StudiesUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations