Landscape Ecology

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 419–431 | Cite as

Landscape dynamics and equilibrium in areas of slash-and-burn agriculture with short and long fallow period (Bragantina region, NE Brazilian Amazon)

  • Jean Paul Metzger


Fallow periods used in slash-and-burn agriculture in the Bragantinaregion, the oldest agricultural frontier in the Brazilian Amazon, are beingreduced. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of a shortenedfallow period on the Bragantina landscape dynamics and equilibrium. Dynamicswere characterized by landscape structural changes, particularly in the spatialdistribution of secondary forests, and by transition matrix. Equilibrium wasdefined by temporal and spatial parameters, and by the increment ofagriculturalareas from 1985 to 1996, analyzed with 6 LANDSAT-TM images. I worked with 6areas of 250 ha each, 3 with short fallow periods (2–4years)and 3 with long fallow periods (about 10 years). Results showed that shortfallow period areas did not present an equilibrium situation. In these areas,developed secondary vegetation tended to disappear and agricultural areas werebeing expanded at an average rate of 3% per year. Landscape structure changespointed out that a reduction in fallow period was occurring in already shortfallow period areas. Long fallow period areas presented a shifting mosaicsteady-state condition, where punctual changes due to agricultural uses werecompensated by field abandonment rate. Both agricultural uses and fieldabandonment rates were lower in long fallow period areas when compared withshort ones. Comparisons with indigenous traditional cropping-fallow cyclesindicate that sustainable conditions could be maintained with 11 years offallowfor each cropping year, while shorter cycles would break down the system ifagricultural improvements are not implemented.

Brazilian amazon Fallow period Landscape dynamics Landscape equilibrium Secondary forests Slash-and-burn agriculture Sustainability Tropical deforestation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Attiwill P.M. 1994. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: The ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management 63: 247-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckerman S. 1987. Swidden in Amazonia and the Amazon rim. In: Turner B.L. II and Brush S.B. (eds), Comparative Farming Systems. Guilford Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 55-94.Google Scholar
  3. Boormann F.H. and Likens G.E. 1979. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Brondizio E.S., Moran E.F., Mausel P. and Wu Y. 1994. Land use change in the Amazon estuary: patterns of caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecology 22: 249-278.Google Scholar
  5. Brondizio E.S., Moran E.F. and Mausel P. 1996. Land cover in the Amazon estuary: linking of the Thematic Mapper with botanical and historical data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 62: 921-928.Google Scholar
  6. Brown L.A. 1970. On the use of Markov chains in movement research. Economic Geography 46: 393-403.Google Scholar
  7. Brown S. and Lugo A.E. 1990. Tropical secondary forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6: 1-32.Google Scholar
  8. Conklin H.C. 1961. The study of shifting cultivation. Current Anthropology 2: 27-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Jong W. 1997. Developing swidden agriculture and the threat of biodiversity loss. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 62: 187-197.Google Scholar
  10. Denich M. 1991. Estudo da importância de uma vegetação secundária nova para o incremento da produtividade do sistema de produção na Amazônia Oriental Brasileira. PhD Dissertation, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Embrapa/CPATUGTZ, Eschborn, Germany.Google Scholar
  11. Diniz T.D.A.S. 1986. Caracterização climática da Amazônia Oriental. Pesquisas sobre a utilização e conservação do solo na Amazônia Oriental. Relatório final do convênio Embrapa-CPATU/GTZ. Embrapa-CPATU, Belém, Brazil, Documentos 40.Google Scholar
  12. Diretoria de Serviços Cartográficos (DSG) 1982a. Castanhal, Folha SA. 23.V-C-I, MI-385, 1:100.000. Ministério do Exército, Brasília, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
  13. Diretoria de Serviços Cartográficos (DSG) 1982b. Capanema, Folha SA. 23.V-C-II, MI-386, 1:100.000. Ministério do Exército, Brasília, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
  14. Diretoria de Serviços Cartográficos (DSG) 1982c. Marapanim, Folha SA. 23.V-A-IV, MI-337, 1:100.000. Ministério do Exército, Brasília, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
  15. Diretoria de Serviços Cartográficos (DSG) 1982d. Salinópolis, Folha SA. 23.V-A-V, MI-338, 1:100.000. Ministério do Exército, Brasília, DF, Brazil.Google Scholar
  16. Fearnside P.M. 1986. Human Carrying Capacity of the Brazilian Rainforest. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Fearnside P.M. 1996. Amazonian deforestation and global warming: Carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil’s Amazon forest. Forest Ecology and Management 80: 21-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fearnside P.M. and Guimarães W.M. 1996. Carbon uptake by secondary forests in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 80: 35-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fox J., Krummel J., Yarnasarn S., Ekasingh M. and Podger N. 1995. Land-use and landscape dynamics in Northern Thailand: assessing change in 3 upland watersheds. Ambio 24: 328-334.Google Scholar
  20. Franklin J.F. and Forman R.T.T. 1987. Creating landscape pattern by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1: 5-18.Google Scholar
  21. Fujisaka S., Bell W., Thomas N., Hurtado L. and Crawford E. 1996. Slash-and-burn agriculture, conversion to pasture, and deforestation in two Brazilian Amazon colonies. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 59: 115-130.Google Scholar
  22. Hölscher D., Möller M.R., Denich M. and Fölster H. 1997. Nutrient input-output budget of shifting agriculture in Eastern Amazonia. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 47: 49-57.Google Scholar
  23. Houghton R.A., Lefkowitz D.S. and Skole D.L. 1991. Changes in the landscape of Latin-America between 1850 and 1985: 1. progressive loss of forests. Forest Ecology and Management 38: 143-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleinn C., Dees M. and Pelz D.R. 1993. Sampling aspects in the TREES project: global inventory of tropical forests. Final Report to the Joint Research Center. Freiburg Universität, Freiburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  25. Köppen W. 1936. Das geographische System der Klimate. In: Köppen W. and Geiger R. (eds), Handbuch der Klimatologie. Bornträger, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Lawrence D., Peart D.R. and Leighton M. 1998. The impact of shifting cultivation on a rainforest landscape in West Kalimantan: spatial and temporal dynamics. Landscape Ecology 13: 135-148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li H., Franklin J.F., Swanson F.J. and Spies T.A. 1993. Developing alternatives forest cutting patterns: a simulation approach. Landscape Ecology 8: 63-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li Y., Mausel P. and Wu Y. 1994. Discrimination between advanced secondary succession and mature moist forest near Altamira, Brazil, using Landsat TM data. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing., pp. 350-364.Google Scholar
  29. Mausel P., Wu Y., Li Y., Moran E.F. and Brondizio E.S. 1993. Spectral identification of successional stages following deforestation in the Amazon. Geocarto International 4: 61-71.Google Scholar
  30. Metzger J.P. 2001. Effects of deforestation pattern and private nature reserves on the forest conservation in agricultural areas of the Brazilian Amazon. Biota Neotropica (1/2) [online] http:// Scholar
  31. Metzger J.P. and Muller E. 1996. Characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries by remote sensing. Landscape Ecology 11: 65-77.Google Scholar
  32. Miller P.M. and Kauffman J.B. 1998. Seedling and sprout response to slash-and-burn agriculture in a tropical deciduous forest. Biotropica 30: 538-546.Google Scholar
  33. Moran E.F. 1981. Developing the Amazon. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Moran E.F., Brondizio E., Mausel P. and Wu Y. 1994. Integrating Amazonia vegetation, land-use, and satellite data. BioScience 44: 329-338.Google Scholar
  35. Muller E. 1993. Evaluation and correction of angular anisotropic effects in multidate SPOT and Thematic Mapper data. Remote Sensing of Environment 45: 295-309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nepstad D.C., Moutinho P.R., Uhl C., Vieira I.C. and Silva J.M.C. 1996. The ecological importance of forest remnants in an Eastern Amazonian frontier landscape. In: Schellas J. and Greenberg R. (eds), Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Island press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 133-150.Google Scholar
  37. Norman M.J.T., Pearson C.J. and Searle P.G.E. 1984. The Ecology of Tropical Food Crops. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  38. Penteado A.R. 1967. Problemas de colonização e de uso da terra na região Bragantina do Estado do Pará. Coleção Amazônica. Universidade Federal do Pará, Pará, PA, USA, Coleção Amazônica, Série José Veríssimo.Google Scholar
  39. RADAMBRASIL 1973. Folha SA 23 São Luis: geologia, geomorfologia, solos, vegetação e uso potencial da terra. Levantamento de Recursos Naturais. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
  40. Ripple W.J., Bradshaw G.A. and Spies T. 1991. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA. Biological Conservation 57: 73-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Romme W.H. 1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Monographs 52: 199-221.Google Scholar
  42. Sanchez P.A. 1976. Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Scatena F.N., Walker R.T., Homma A.K.O., de Conto A.J., Ferreira C.A.P., Carvalho R.D. et al. 1996. Cropping and fallowing sequences of small farms in the “terra firme” landscape of the Brazilian Amazon: A case study from Santarém, Pará. Ecological Economics 18: 29-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Serrão E.A.S., Nepstad D. and Walker R. 1996. Upland agricultural and forestry development in the Amazon: sustainability, criticality and resilience. Ecological Economics 18: 3-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silva B.N.R. 1994. Levantamento detalhado dos solos em áreas destinadas a pesquisa agroflorestal no município de Igarapé-Açu, PA. Relatório de atividade de apoio ao desenvolvimento. Embrapa-CPATU, Belém, PA, Brazil.Google Scholar
  46. Smith N.J.H. 1981. Colonization lessons from a tropical forest. Science 214: 755-761.Google Scholar
  47. Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1995. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. Freeman and Company, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Thomlinson J.R., Serrano M.I., López T.M., Aide T.M. and Zimmerman J. 1996. Land-use dynamics in a post-agricultural Puerto Rican landscape (1936-1988). Biotropica 28: 525-536.Google Scholar
  49. Tucker J.M., Brondizio E.S. and Moran E.F. 1998. Rates of forest regrowth in eastern Amazônia: a comparison of Altamira and Bragantina regions, Pará sate, Brazil. Interciencia 23: 64-73.Google Scholar
  50. Turner M.G., Romme W.H., Gardner R.H., O’Neill R.V. and Kratz T.K. 1993. A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 213-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valverde O. and Dias C.V. 1967. A rodovia Belém-Brasília: estudo de geografia regional. Fundação IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
  52. Vasconcelos H.L. 1999. Effects of forest disturbance on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in central Amazonia. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 409-420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vieira I.C.G. 1996. Forest succession after shifting cultivation in eastern Amazonia. PhD Dissertation, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
  54. Vieira I.C.G. and Proctor J. 1999. Dinâmica de sementes e regeneração vegetativa em florestas sucessionais da Amazônia oriental. In: CATIE. Reuniões Técnicas. Vol. 9., Turrialba, Costa Rica, pp. 89-97.Google Scholar
  55. Vielhauer K., Kanashiro M., Sá T.D.A. and Denich M. 1998. Technology development of slash-and-mulch and fallow enrichment in shifting cultivation systems of the Eastern Amazon. In: Proceedings of the Third SHIFT-Workshop., Manaus, Brazil, pp. 49-59.Google Scholar
  56. Walker R. and Homma A.K.O. 1996. Land use and land cover dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon: an overview. Ecological Economics 18: 67-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker R.T., Homma A.K.O., Scatena F.N., Conto A.J., Rodrigues-Pedrazza C.D., Ferreira C.A.P. et al. 1997. Land cover evolution of small properties: the Transamazon Highway. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 35: 115-126.Google Scholar
  58. Zipperer W.C. 1993. Deforestation patterns and their effects on forest patches. Landscape Ecology 8: 177-184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Paul Metzger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology – Institute of BioscienceUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations