Landscape Ecology

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 403–418 | Cite as

Changes in mixed deciduous forests of boreal Sweden 1866–1999 based on interpretation of historical records

  • Anna-Lena Axelsson
  • Lars Östlund
  • Erik Hellberg


Current knowledge of patterns and abundance of deciduous trees in thepre-industrial landscape of boreal Sweden is limited. This is due to a dramatictransformation of the forest landscape during the last 100 years and the lackofrepresentative forest reserves. We used historical records to study change infive mixed deciduous forests between 1866 and 1999. The results show that largechanges occurred due to complex interactions between fire disturbance, firesuppression, logging and silviculture. Before fire suppression, the presence ofdeciduous trees was mainly determined by earlier fire influence. Laterselectivelogging disturbed natural succession and favoured regeneration of deciduoustrees. During the 20th century deciduous trees were removed bygirdling, thinning and herbicide spraying. Much of the mixed deciduous standschanged to coniferous stands between 1906–15 and 1969–70, and thendeciduous trees were totally removed from these stands between late 1960s and1999. Today mixed deciduous forest occurs mainly in young stands and on othersites than previously. Our results also show that large coniferous trees andmulti-aged forest occurred in all sites in the early 1900s. Most sites weredominated by coniferous species and forest dominated by deciduous treesoccurredonly in smaller areas. These results are not consistent with the current viewthat deciduous-dominated forest occupied substantial areas in boreal Swedenbefore fire suppression. Appropriate changes in forest management arediscussed,as is the value of historical data in interpreting changes in forestlandscapes.

Boreal Deciduous trees Fire Forest history Forest management Land-use history Logging Regeneration Restoration Succession 


  1. Angelstam P.K. 1998. Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 593-602.Google Scholar
  2. Anon 1932. Uppskattning av Sveriges skogstillgångar verkställd åren 1923-1929: redogörelse avgiven av Riksskogstaxeringsnämnden. Vol. 26. Statens offentliga utredningar, Jordbruksdepartementet.Google Scholar
  3. Anon 1990. Statistiska meddelanden. Serie J: Jordbruk, skogsbruk och fiske. Statistiska centralbyrån.Google Scholar
  4. Anon 1997. Swedish FSC Standard for Forest Certification-English version. The Swedish FSC Working Group Secretariat. Anon 2000. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  5. Ås S. 1993. Are habitat islands islands-woodliving beetles (Coleoptera) in deciduous forest fragments in boreal forest. Ecography 16: 219-228.Google Scholar
  6. Axelsson A.-L. 2001. Forest landscape change in boreal Sweden 1850-2000-a multi-scale approach. PhD Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
  7. Axelsson A.-L. and Östlund L. 2001. Retrospective gap analysis in a Swedish boreal forest landscape using historical data. Forest Ecology and Management 147: 109-122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg A., Ehnström B., Gustafsson L., Hallingbäck T., Jonsell M. and Weslien J. 1994. Threatened plant, animal and fungus species in Swedish forests-distribution and habitat associations. Conservation Biology 8: 718-731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg A., Ehnström B., Gustafsson L., Hallingbäck T., Jonsell M. and Weslien J. 1995. Threat levels and threats to red-listed species in Swedish forests. Conservation Biology 9: 1629-1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berg S., Lundström A. and Svensson S.A. 1996. Lövträd i Sverige: tillgångar och utnyttjande idag samt framtida utveckling i några områden. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  11. Bergman F. 1991. Björk och asp i ett skogshistoriskt perspektiv. In: Anon (ed.), Björk och asp. Skogsfakta., pp. 4-15.Google Scholar
  12. Bunte R., Gaunitz S. and Borgegård L. 1982. Vindeln-En norrländsk kommuns ekonomiska utveckling 1800-1980. Bröderna Ekstrands Tryckeri AB, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  13. Burgi M. 1999. A case study of forest change in the Swiss lowlands. Landscape Ecology 14: 567-575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engelmark O. 1999. Boreal Forest Disturbances. In: Walker L.R. (ed.), Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 161-186.Google Scholar
  15. Ericsson O. 1992. The influence of forest fires on seedling establishment of Populus tremula L. and Salix caprea L. MSc Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
  16. Esseen P.A., Ehnström B., Ericson L. and Sjöberg K. 1997. Boreal forests. In: Hansson L. (ed.), Boreal Ecosystems and Landscapes: Structures, Processes and Conservation of Biodiversity., pp. 16-47.Google Scholar
  17. Hazell P. and Gustafsson L. 1999. Retention of trees at final harvest-evaluation of a conservation technique using epiphytic bryophyte and lichen transplants. Biological Conservation 90: 133-142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heinselman M. 1996. The Boundary Waters Wilderness Ecosystem. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Jansson G. and Angelstam P. 1999. Threshold levels of habitat composition for the presence of the long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) in a boreal landscape. Landscape Ecology 14: 283-290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johansson O. 1998. Handledning för ekologisk landskapsplanering (ELP) inom AssiDomän. AssiDomän, Växjö.Google Scholar
  21. Jonsell M., Weslien J. and Ehnström B. 1998. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 749-764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langston N. 1995. Forest Dreams, Forest Nightmares. The Paradox of Old Growth in the Inland West. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Linder P. 1998. Stand structure and successional trends in forest reserves in boreal Sweden. PhD Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
  24. Linder P. and Östlund L. 1998. Structural changes in three midboreal Swedish forest landscapes, 1885-1996. Biological Conservation 85: 9-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lämås T. and Fries C. 1995. Emergence of a biodiversity concept in Swedish forest policy. Water Air and Soil Pollution 82: 57-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martikainen P., Kaila L. and Haila Y. 1998. Threatened beetles in White-backed Woodpecker habitats. Conservation Biology 12: 293-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mikusinski G. and Angelstam P. 1999. Man and deciduous trees in managed boreal landscape. In: Kovar P. (ed.), Nature and Culture in Landscape Ecology. Experience for the 3rd Millenium. The Karolinum Press, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 220-224.Google Scholar
  28. Niklasson M. 1998. Dendroecological studies in forest and fire history. PhD Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
  29. Niklasson M. and Granström A. 2000. Numbers and sizes of fires: Long-term spatially explicit fire history in a Swedish boreal landscape. Ecology 81: 1484-1499.Google Scholar
  30. Östlund L. 1993. Exploitation and structural changes in the north Swedish boreal forest 1800-1992. PhD Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
  31. Östlund L. and Linderson H. 1995. A Dendrochronological Study of the Exploitation and Transformation of a Boreal Forest Stand. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 10: 56-64.Google Scholar
  32. Östlund L., Zackrisson O. and Axelsson A.-L. 1997. The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 1198-1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Radeloff V.C., Mladenoff D.J., He H.S. and Boyce M.S. 1999. Forest landscape change in the northwestern Wisconsin Pine Barrens from pre-European settlement to the present. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 1649-1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Romme W.H., Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., Hargrove W.W., Tuskan G.A., Despain D.G. et al. 1997. A rare episode of sexual reproduction in Aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx) following the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Natural Areas Journal 17: 17-25.Google Scholar
  35. Romme W.H., Turner M.G., Wallace L.L. and Walker J.S. 1995. Aspen, Elk, and Fire in Northern Yellowstone-National-Park. Ecology 76: 2097-2106.Google Scholar
  36. Sachs D.L., Sollins P. and Cohen W.B. 1998. Detecting landscape changes in the interior of British Columbia from 1975 to 1992 using satellite imagery. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 23-36.Google Scholar
  37. Siitonen J. and Martikainen P. 1994. Occurence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Populus-tremula-a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9: 185-191.Google Scholar
  38. Slotte H. 1997. Hamling-historisk tillbakablick och råd för naturvårdare. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 91: 1-21.Google Scholar
  39. Stener L.-G. 1998. Länsvisa uppgifter om areal och virkesförråd för lövträd: uppgifter baserade på riksskogstaxeringarna 1990-1995. Vol. 4. Redogörelse, Skogforsk, Sweden.Google Scholar
  40. Stenman L. 1983. Avvittringen i Västerbottens läns lappmarker. PhD Dissertation, Kulturgeografiska institutionen, Uppsala universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  41. Stokes M.A. and Smiley T.L. 1968. An introduction to tree-ring dating. Chicago University Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Thorell K.E. and Östlin E.O. 1931. The National Forest Survey of Sweden. Journal of Forestry 4: 585-591.Google Scholar
  43. Tirén L. 1937. Skogshistoriska studier i trakten av Degerfors i Västerbotten. Meddelanden från Statens skogsförsöksanstalt 30: 67-322.Google Scholar
  44. Trolle J.-P. 1947. Träkolsindustrien i Lycksele. In: Schrevelius L.F.s. (ed.), Lycksele stad och lappmark. Hälsingborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  45. Weir J.M.H. and Johnson E.A. 1998. Effects of escaped settlement fires and logging on forest composition in the mixedwood boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 459-467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White P.S. and Walker J.L. 1997. Approximating nature’s variation: Selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5: 338-349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whitney G.G. 1987. An Ecological History of the Great-Lakes Forest of Michigan. Journal of Ecology 75: 667-684.Google Scholar
  48. Whitney G.G. 1994. From Coastal Wilderness to Fruited Plain. A History of Environmental Change in Temperate North America from 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  49. Wikars L.-O. and Ås S. 1999. Skalbaggarna som följer branden. Skog & Forskning 2: 53-58.Google Scholar
  50. Zackrisson O. 1977. Influence of forest fires on the north Swedish boreal forest. Oikos 29: 22-32.Google Scholar
  51. Zackrisson O. 1985. Some evolutionary aspects of life history characteristics of broadleaved tree species found in the boreal forest. In: Hägglund B. and Peterson G. (eds), Broadleaves in Boreal Silviculture-an Obstacle or an Asset? Institutionen för skogsskötsel, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Umeå, Sweden, pp. 17-36.Google Scholar
  52. Zackrisson O. and Östlund L. 1991. Branden formade skogslandskapets mosaik. Skog & Forskning 4: 13-21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna-Lena Axelsson
    • 1
  • Lars Östlund
    • 2
  • Erik Hellberg
    • 2
  1. 1.The National Board of Forestry83, JönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Forest Vegetation EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations