Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 307–309 | Cite as

Palliative care in seven European countries

  • Lars Johan Materstvedt


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beauchamp, T.L.: 1994, 'The “Four-Principles” Approach', in: R. Gillon (ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T.L. and J.F. Childress: 1994, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Broeckaert, B. and J.M. Nunez Olarte: 2002, 'Sedation in Palliative Care: Facts and Concepts', in: H. ten Have and D. Clark (eds.), The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspectives.Facing Death series. Oxford: Open University Press, pp. 166–180.Google Scholar
  4. Gillon, R.: 1994, 'Medical Ethics: Four Principles Plus Attention to Scope', BMJ 309: 184–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffiths, J., A. Bood and H. Weyers: 1998, Euthanasia and Law in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Have H. ten and D. Clark (eds.): 2002, The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspectives.Facing Death series. Oxford: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Krakauer, E.L., R.T. Penson, R.D. Truog, L.A. King, B.A. Chabner and T.J. Lynch Jr.: 2000, 'Sedation for Intractable Distress of a Dying Patient: Acute Palliative Care and the Principle of Double Effect', Oncologist 5, 53–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Materstvedt, L.J. and S. Kaasa: 2000, 'Is Terminal Sedation Active Euthanasia?' (Review. Norwegian.) Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen Jun 10; 120(15), 1763–1768.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Materstvedt, L.J. and S. Kaasa: 2002, 'Euthanasia and Physician-assisted Suicide in Scandinavia-with a Conceptual Suggestion Regarding International Research in Relation to the Phenomena', Palliat Med 16, 17–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Orentlicher, D.: 1997, 'The Supreme Court and Physicianassisted Suicide-Rejecting Assisted Suicide but Embracing Euthanasia'. Sounding Board, N Engl J Med 337, 1236–1239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Orentlicher, D.: 1998, 'The Supreme Court and Terminal Sedation. An Ethically Inferior Alternative to Physician-assisted Suicide', in: M.P. Battin, R. Rhodes and A. Silvers (eds.), Physician Assisted Suicide. Expanding the Debate.New York: Routledge, pp. 301–311.Google Scholar
  12. Popper, K.: 1935, Logik der Forschung. Wien: Julius Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Popper, K.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Popper, K.: 1972, Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Roy, D.J. C.-H. Rapin and the EAPC Board of Directors: 1994, Regarding Euthanasia. Eur Jour Palliat Care 1, 57–59. (Also available in full text at: projects/ethics.html)Google Scholar
  16. Quill, T.E., B. Lo and D.W. Brock: 'Palliative Options of Last Resort. A Comparison of Voluntarily Stopping Eating and drinking, Terminal Sedation, Physician-assisted Suicide, and Voluntary Active Euthanasia', JAMA 23, 2099–2104.Google Scholar
  17. World Health Organisation: 'Cancer Pain Relief and Palliative Care'. Technical Report Series 804. Geneva, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Zylicz, Z.: 'Palliative Care: Dutch Hospice and Euthanasia', in: D.C. Thomasma, T. Kimbrough-Kushner, G.K. Kimsma and C. Ciesielski-Carlucci (eds.) Asking to Die. Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187–203.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Johan Materstvedt
    • 1
  1. 1.The Norwegian Cancer Society, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Philosophy, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations