Advertisement

Teaching Business Ethics

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 435–445 | Cite as

Comparing Levels of Machiavellianism of Today's College Students with College Students of the 1960s

  • Robert L. Webster
  • Harry A. Harmon
Article

Abstract

The tactics, strategies, and behaviors thatwere suggested by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince (1513) have become synonymous withmanipulative and unethical behavior. AlthoughMachiavelli wrote to the politician, hiswritings have since been expanded to describebusiness leaders as well as general behavior. The research we report examined theMachiavellian tendencies of current collegestudents and compares the results to theseminal study by Christie and Geis (1970). Theresearch reported here examined thecontemporary student's propensity towardMachiavellianism distinguished by major fieldof study and by gender. The data werecollected from students at colleges located inthe Midwest and the Southwest. We reportfindings that are similar to Christie and Geisand extend the trend line suggested by theirresearch. We believe these findings provideinsight for understanding the dynamics ofcontemporary college students and suggest acontinuing societal movement towardMachiavellian behavior.

Keywords

College Student General Behavior Unethical Behavior Trend Line Societal Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, 'A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 265–280.Google Scholar
  2. Calhoon, R. P.: 1969, 'Niccolo Machiavelli and the Twentieth Century Administrator', Academy of Management Journal 12 (June), 205–212.Google Scholar
  3. Christie, R. and F. L. Geis: 1970, Studies in Machiavellianism, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Chonko, L. B.: 1982, 'Are Purchasing Agents Machiavellian?', Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 18 (Winter), 15–20.Google Scholar
  5. Dubinsky, A. J.: 1978, 'A Call for Action: Students' Assessments of Personal Selling', Paper presented at the Midwest Business Administration Association Conference, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Ferrell, O. C. and S. J. Skinner: 1988, 'Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations', Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February), 103–109.Google Scholar
  7. Gemmill, G. R. and W. J. Heisler: 1972, 'Machiavellianism as a Factor in Managerial Job Strain, Job Satisfaction, and Upward Mobility', Academy of Management Journal (March), 51–62.Google Scholar
  8. Grant, E. W. Jr. and L. S. Broom: 1988, 'Attitudes Toward Ethics: A View of the College Student', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 617–619.Google Scholar
  9. Hunt, S. D. and L. B. Chonko: 1984, 'Marketing and Machiavellianism', Journal of Marketing 48, 30–42.Google Scholar
  10. La Barbera, P. A. and Z. Gurhan: 1997, 'The Role of Materialism, Religiosity, and Demographics in Subjective Well-Being', Psychology & Marketing 14(1), 71–97.Google Scholar
  11. Likierman, A.: 1989, 'Ethical Dilemmas for Accountants: A United Kingdom Perspective', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 617–629.Google Scholar
  12. Machiavelli, N.: 1513, 1966, The Prince, Translated by Daniel Donno, Bantam Books, New York.Google Scholar
  13. McKay, S., J. F. Hair Jr., M. W. Johnston and D. L. Sherrell: 1991, 'An Exploratory Investigation of Reward and Corrective Responses to Salesperson Performance: An Attributional Approach', Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management XI 2 (Spring), 39–48.Google Scholar
  14. Merritt, S.: 1991, 'Marketing Ethics and Education: Some Empirical Findings', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 625–632.Google Scholar
  15. Petersen, A.: 1999, 'All the Hot Gen X Pundits, Like, Vanished', Wall Street Journal August 31, 1999, B1.Google Scholar
  16. Rayburn, J. M. and L. G. Rayburn: 1996, 'Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Type A Personality and Ethical-Orientation', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 1209–1219.Google Scholar
  17. Sirgy, M. J.: 1999, 'Social Responsibility and the Marketing Educator: A Discussion Document', Journal of Business Ethics 19, 193–206.Google Scholar
  18. Touhey, J. C.: 1973, 'Intelligence, Machiavellianism, and Social Mobility', British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 12 (February), 34–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Webster
    • 1
  • Harry A. Harmon
    • 2
  1. 1.Ouachita Baptist UniversityUSA
  2. 2.College of Business AdministrationCentral Missouri State UniversityWarrensburg

Personalised recommendations