Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 859–878

The Elusive Honey Bee Dance “Language” Hypothesis

  • Adrian M. Wenner
Article

Abstract

In the mid-1930s, Karl von Frisch proposed the equivalent of an odor-search hypothesis for honey bee recruitment to food sources. A decade later he switched to the equivalent of a “dance language” hypothesis (though he apparently did not consider his conclusions as hypotheses in either case). The later and more exotic hypothesis rapidly gained acceptance, but it failed its first experimental tests in the mid-1960s; searching recruits did not behave as von Frisch indicated they should under the language hypothesis. His earlier and more conservative odor-search hypothesis meshed better with results obtained in those test experiments. Language advocates then ignored basic precepts of scientific process, rejected and/or ignored results not in accord with their favored hypothesis, and instead repeatedly sought additional supportive evidence. While so doing, they inadvertently accumulated yet more evidence counter to von Frisch's original intent. By invoking ad hoc modifications and qualifications, advocates weakened, rather than strengthened, the hypothesis they continued to embrace. That strict adherence to the language hypothesis has had an unfortunate result; the exclusive investment in that line of research by various governmental agencies has failed to provide practical help to beekeepers or growers in the past half-century.

honey bee “dance language” hypothesis odor-search hypothesis von Frisch recruitment to food 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bernard, C. ([1865] 1957). An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Carde, R. T. (1984). Chemo-orientation in flying insects. In Bell, W. J., and Carde, R. T. (eds), Chemical Ecology of Insects, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 111–124.Google Scholar
  3. Chalmers, A. F. ([1976] 1978). What Is This Thing Called Science? Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Chamberlin, T. C. ([1890] 1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 148: 754–759.Google Scholar
  5. Crane, E. (1990). Bees and Beekeeping: Science, Practice, and World Resources, Heinemann Newnes, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Donovan, B. J. (2000). A comprehensive honey bee dance and odour “language” hypothesis. Bee World 81: 5–10.Google Scholar
  7. Dyer, F. C. (2002). The biology of the dance language. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 917–949.Google Scholar
  8. Esch, H., and Bastian, J. A. (1970). How do newly recruited honey bees approach a food site? Z. Vergl. Physiol. 68: 175–181.Google Scholar
  9. Fleck, L. ([1935] 1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Free, J. B. (1987). Pheromones of Social Bees, Cornell University Press, lthaca, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Friesen, L. (1973). The search dynamics of recruited honey bees, Apis mellifera liguistica Spinola. Biol. Bull. 144: 107–131.Google Scholar
  12. Gary, N. E. (1992). Activities and behavior of honey bees. In Graham. J.M(ed.), The Hive and the Honey Bee, Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, IL, pp. 269–372.Google Scholar
  13. Gould, J. L. (1976). The dance-language controversy. Q. Rev. Biol. 51: 211–244.Google Scholar
  14. Gould, J. L., and Gould, C. G. (1988). The Honey Bee, Scientific American Library, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Gould, J. L., Henerey, M., and MacLeod, M. C. (1970). Communication of direction by the honey bee. Science 169: 544–554.Google Scholar
  16. Gould, S. J., and Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form. Palebiology 8: 4–15.Google Scholar
  17. Hailman, J. P. (1977). Bee dancing and evolutionary epistemology. Am. Nat. 11: 187–189.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, P. S. M., Wells, P. H., and Wells, H. (1997). Spontaneous flower constancy and learning in honey bees as a function of colour. Anim. Behav. 54: 615–627.Google Scholar
  19. Kak, S. C. (1991). The honey bee dance language controversy. Mankind Q. 31: 357–365.Google Scholar
  20. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, Vol. 4, pp. 91–195.Google Scholar
  21. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England.Google Scholar
  22. Lindauer, M. (1961). Communication Among Social Bees, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Lindegren, C. C. (1966). Cold War in Biology, Planarian Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  24. Medawar, P. B. ([1979] 1981). Advice to a Young Scientist, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Michelsen, A. (1993). The transfer of information in the dance language of honeybees: Progress and problems. J. Comp. Physiol. A 173: 135–141P.Google Scholar
  26. Michelsen, A., Andersen, B. B., Kirchner, W. H., and Lindauer, M. (1989). Honeybees can be recruited by a mechanical model of a dancing bee. Naturwissenschaften 76: 277–280.Google Scholar
  27. Michelsen, A., Andersen, B. B., Storm, J., Kirchner, W. H., and Lindauer, M. (1992). How honeybees perceive communication dances, studied by means of a mechanical model. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 143–150.Google Scholar
  28. Michener, C. D. (1974). The Social Behavior of the Bees: A Comparative Study,Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. O'Dea, J. D. (2000). Why do honeybees dance? http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-13/nsjdo. htmlGoogle Scholar
  30. Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science 146: 347–353.Google Scholar
  31. Popper, K. R. (1957). Philosophy of science: A personal report. In Mace, C. A. (ed.), British Philosophy in the Mid-Century, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Ribbands, C. R. (1953). The Behaviour and Social Life of Honeybees, Bee Research Assoc. London.Google Scholar
  33. Rosin, R. (1980). The honey-bee “dance language” hypothesis and the foundations of biology and behavior.J. Theor. Biol. 87: 457–481.Google Scholar
  34. Schmidt, J.O. (1994). Attraction of reproductive honey bee swarms to artificial nests by Nasonov pheromone. J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 1053–1056.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, J. O. (1999). Attractant or pheromone: The case of Nasonov secretion and honeybee swarms. J. Chem. Ecol. 25: 2051–2056.Google Scholar
  36. Seeley, T. D. (1985). Honeybee Ecology: A Study of Adaptation in Social Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  37. Seeley, T. D. (1995). The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  38. Steinbeck, J. ([1941] 1962). The Log from the Sea of Cortez, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Towne, W. F., and Gould, J. L. (1988). The spatial precision of the honey bees' dance communication. J. Insect Behav. 1: 129–155.Google Scholar
  40. Vadas, R. L., Jr. (1994). The anatomy of an ecological controversy: Honey-bee searching behavior. Oikos 69: 158–166.Google Scholar
  41. Veldink, C. (1989). The honey-bee language controversy. Interdisc. Sci. Rev. 14: 166–175.Google Scholar
  42. von Frisch, K. (1937). The language of bees. Sci. Progr. 32: 29–37 (reprinted inWenner, 1993).Google Scholar
  43. von Frisch, K. (1943). Versuche uber die Lenkung des Bienenfluges durch Dufstoffe [Experiments on directing bee flight by odors]. Naturwissenschaften 31: 445–460. [Translation by W. J. Nolan: Library of the International Bee Research Association.]Google Scholar
  44. von Frisch, K. (1947). The dance of the bees. Bull. Anim. Behav. 5: 1–32.Google Scholar
  45. von Frisch, K. (1948). Solved and unsolved problems of bee language. Bull. Anim. Behav. 9: 2–25.Google Scholar
  46. von Frisch, K. (1950). Bees: Their Vision, Chemical Senses, and Language, Cornell University Press, lthaca NY.Google Scholar
  47. von Frisch, K. (1962). Dialects in the language of the bees. Sci. Am. 207: 78–87.Google Scholar
  48. von Frisch, K. (1967). The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Waller, G. D. (1970). Attracting honeybees to alfalfa with citral, geraniol, and anise. J. Apicult. Res. 9: 9–12.Google Scholar
  50. Weidemuller, A., and Seeley, T. D. (1999). Imprecision in waggle dances of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 190–199.Google Scholar
  51. Wells, P. H. and Wenner, A. M. (1971). The influence of food scent on behavior of foraging honeybees. Physiol. Zool. 44: 191–209.Google Scholar
  52. Wells, P. H., and Wenner, A. M. (1973). Do bees have a language? Nature 241: 171–174.Google Scholar
  53. Wells, P., Wells, H., Vadehrav. Vu, N., Lee, C., Han, R., Han, K., and Chang, L. (1993). Does honey bee Nasanov pheromone attract foragers? Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 92: 70–77.Google Scholar
  54. Wenner, A. M. (1959). The relationship of sound production during the waggle dance of the honey bee to the distance of the food source. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 5: 142.Google Scholar
  55. Wenner, A. M. (1962). Sound production during the waggle dance of the honey bee. Anim. Behav. 10: 79–95.Google Scholar
  56. Wenner, A. M. (1964). Sound communication in honey bees. Sci. Am. 210: 116–124. 878 Wenner Google Scholar
  57. Wenner, A.M. (1971). The Bee Language Controversy: An Experience in Science, Educational Programs Improvement Corp., Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  58. Wenner, A. M. (1992). Swarm movement: A mystery explained. Am. Bee J. 132: 27–31. Wenner, A. M. [with K. von Frisch] (1993). The language of bees. Bee World 74: 90- 98.Google Scholar
  59. Wenner, A.M. (1997).The role of controversy in animal behavior. In Greenberg, C, and Tobach, E. (eds.), Comparative Psychology of Invertebrates: The Field and Laboratory Study of Insect Behavior, Garland, New York, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
  60. Wenner, A.M. (1998a). Honey bee “dance language” controversy. In Greenberg, C., and Hara, M. (eds.), Comparative Psychology: A Handbook, Garland, New York, pp. 823–836.Google Scholar
  61. Wenner, A.M. (1998b). Odors, wind and colony foraging—Part I. The need for odor. Am. Bee J. 138: 746–748.Google Scholar
  62. Wenner, A. M. (1998c). Odors, wind and colony foraging—Part II. The role of wind direction. Am. Bee J. 138: 807–810.Google Scholar
  63. Wenner, A. M. (1998d). Odors, wind and colony foraging—Part III. Insights from beehunting. Am. Bee J. 138: 897–899.Google Scholar
  64. Wenner, A. M., and Wells, P. H. (1990). Anatomy of a Controversy: The Question of a “Language” Among Bees, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  65. Wenner, A. M., Meade, D., and Friesen, L. J. (1991). Recruitment, search behavior, and flight ranges of honey bees. Am. Zool. 31: 768–782.Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, E. O. (1971). The Insect Societies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  67. Winston, M. L. (1987). The Biology of the Honey Bee, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  68. Winston, M. L., and Slessor, K. N. (1993). Applications of queen honey bee mandibular pheromone for beekeeping and crop pollination. Bee World 74: 111–128.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian M. Wenner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine BiologyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara

Personalised recommendations