Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 691–710

Anomalous Rayleigh-Wave Propagation Along Oceanic Trench

  • Kiyoshi Yomogida
  • Riko Okuyama
  • Ichiro Nakanishi
Article

Abstract

A clear later phase of amplitude larger than the direct surface wave packet was observed at stations in Hokkaido, Japan, for several events of the December 1991 off-Urup earthquake swarm in the Kuril Islands region. From its particle motion, this phase is likely to be a fundamental Rayleigh wave packet that arrived with an azimuth largely deviated from each great-circle direction. As its origin, Nakanishi (1992) proposed that the sea-trench topography in this area as deep as 10 km may produce a narrow zone of low velocity for Rayleigh waves of periods around 15 sec. Following this idea, we compute ray paths and estimate how Rayleigh waves would propagate if we assume that lateral velocity variations are caused only by seafloor topography. We confirm that thick sea water in the trench indeed produces the phase velocity of Rayleigh waves to be smaller than in a surrounding area by the degree over 100%. Such a low-velocity zone appears only in a period range from 12 to 20 sec. Although this strong low-velocity zone disturbs the direction of Rayleigh wave propagation from its great circle, the overall ray paths are not so affected as far as an epicentre is outside this low-velocity zone, that is, off the trench axis. In contrast, the majority of rays are severely distorted for an event within the low-velocity zone or, in other words, in the neighborhood of the trench axis. For such an event, a part of wave energy appears to be trapped in this zone and eventually propagates outwards due to the curvature or bend of trench geometry, resulting in very late arriving waves of large amplitude with an incident direction clearly different from great circles. This phenomenon is observed only at a very limited period range around 16 sec. These theoretical results are consistent with the above mentioned observation of Nakanishi (1992).

Rayleigh wave later phase oceanic trench ray tracing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aki K. and Richards P.G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  2. Boore D.M., 1972. Finite difference methods for seismic wave propagation in heterogeneous materials. In: B.A. Bolt (Ed.), Seismology: Surface Waves and Earth Oscillations (Methods in Computational Physics, vol. 11) (ed. by B.A. Bolt), New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Červený V., 2001. Seismic Ray Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlen F.A. and Tromp J., 1998. Theoretical Global Seismology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  5. Debayle E. and Kennett B.L.N., 2000. The Australian continental upper mantle: Structure and deformation inferred from surface waves. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 25243-25450.Google Scholar
  6. Dorman J., Ewing M. and Oliver J., 1960. Study of shear-velocity distribution in the upper mantle by mantle Rayleigh waves. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 50, 87-115.Google Scholar
  7. Ewing M., Press F. and Worzel J.L., 1952. Further study of the T phase. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 42, 37-51.Google Scholar
  8. Fukao Y. and Kanjo K., 1980. A zone of low-frequency earthquakes beneath the inner wall of the Japan trench. Tectonophysics, 67, 153-162.Google Scholar
  9. Hori S., Inoue H., Fukao Y. and Ukawa M., 1985. Seismic detection of the untransformed ‘basaltic’ oceanic crust subducting into the mantle. Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc., 83, 169-197.Google Scholar
  10. Ihmle P.F. and Madariaga R., 1996. Monochromatic body waves excited by great subduction zone earthquakes. Geophy. Res. Lett., 23, 2999-3002.Google Scholar
  11. Jobert N. and Jobert G., 1983. An application of ray theory to the propagation of waves along a laterally heterogeneous spherical earth. Geophys. Res. Lett., 10, 1148-1151.Google Scholar
  12. Kennett B.L.N., 1998. Guided waves in three-dimensional structures. Geophys. J. Int., 133, 159-174.Google Scholar
  13. Kennett B.L.N., Bostock M.G. and Xie J.-K., 1960. Guided-wave tracking in 3-D: A tool for interpreting complex regional seismograms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 80, 633-642.Google Scholar
  14. Kirpichnikova N.Y., 1969. Rayleigh wave concentrated near a ray on the surface of an inhomogeneous elastic body. In: Mathematical problems in wave propagation theory, part II, Seminar in Mathematics, 15, 49-62, Steklov Mathematical Institute, Nauka, Leningrad (in Russian, English translation by Consultants Bureau, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  15. Nakanishi I., 1992. Rayleigh waves guided by sea-trench topography. Geophy. Res. Lett., 19, 2385-2388.Google Scholar
  16. Nakanishi I., Hanakago Y., Moriya T. and Kasahara M., 1991. Performance test on long-period moment tensor determination for near earthquakes by a sparse local network. Geophy. Res. Lett., 18, 223-226.Google Scholar
  17. Okamoto T., 1993. Effects of sedimentary structure and bathymetry near the source on teleseismic P waveforms from shallow subduction zone earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int., 112, 471-490.Google Scholar
  18. Petersen H., Avouac J.P. and Campillo M., 1998. Anomalous surface waves from Lop Nor nuclear explosions: Observations and numerical modelling. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 15051-15068.Google Scholar
  19. Saito M., 1988. DISPER80: A subroutine package for the calculation of seismic normal-mode solutions. In: D.J. Doornbos (Ed.), Seismological Algorithms, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  20. Shapiro N.M., Campillo M., Singh S.K. and Pacheco J., 1998. Seismic channel waves in the accretionary prism of the Middle America Trench. Geophy. Res. Lett., 25, 101-194.Google Scholar
  21. Shapiro N.M., Olsen K.B. and Singh S.K., 2000. Wave-guide effects in subduction zones: evidence from three-dimensional modelling. Geophy. Res. Lett., 27, 433-436.Google Scholar
  22. Van Heijst H.J. and Woodhouse J.H., 1999. Global high-resolution phase velocity distributions of overtone and fundamental-mode surface waves determined by mode branch stripping. Geophys. J. Int., 137, 601-620.Google Scholar
  23. Wadati K., 1928. Unusual nature of deep-sea earthquakes — on the three types of earthquakes. Kishoshushi, 6, 1-43 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  24. Woodhouse J.H., 1974. Surface waves in a laterally varying layered structure. Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc., 37, 461-490.Google Scholar
  25. Woodhouse J.H. and Dziewonski A.M., 1984. Mapping the upper mantle: Three-dimensional modelling of Earth structure by inversion of seismic waveforms. J. Geophys. Res., 37, 5953-5986.Google Scholar
  26. Woodhouse J.H. and Wong Y.K., 1986. Amplitude, phase and path anomalies of mantle waves. Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc., 87, 753-773.Google Scholar
  27. Yomogida K., 1984. Gaussian beams for surface waves in laterally slowly-varying media. Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc., 82, 511-533.Google Scholar
  28. Yomogida K. and Aki K., 1985. Waveform synthesis of surface waves in a laterally heterogeneous Earth by the Gaussian beam method. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 7665-7688.Google Scholar
  29. Yoshida M., 2000. Fluctuation of group velocity of Love waves across a dent in the continental crust. Earth, Planets Space, 52, 393-402.Google Scholar
  30. Zahradník J. and Moczo P., 1996. Hybrid seismic modelling based on discrete-wavenumber and finite-difference methods. Pure Appl. Geophys., 148, 21-38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© StudiaGeo s.r.o. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiyoshi Yomogida
    • 1
  • Riko Okuyama
    • 2
  • Ichiro Nakanishi
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Planetary Systems Science, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of HiroshimaHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Department of GeophysicsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations