Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 479–499 | Cite as

The Great Interview: 25 Strategies for Studying People in Bed

  • Joseph C. HermanowiczEmail author


Interviewing is among the most central methods in social science research. While common as a method, there are identifiable characteristics that distinguish good interviews from outstanding ones. Great interviewing is deceptively difficult, partly because it is an acquired ability that takes time to develop, partly because people often remain bound to conventional norms of behavior while interviewing that precludes open access to the people interviewed. While several texts are available on interviewing, few of them venture to draw the explicit distinction among characteristics that separate ordinary from outstanding interviews. Consequently, a concise and accessible guidepost that directs people to the essentials of outstanding interviewing is difficult to find. Based on interviews with a range of people about varied subjects, the author offers 25 directions that will, when followed in combination, point the interviewer along the road from the good (or not-so-good) interview to the great interview.

research methods interviews techniques 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Chambliss, D. F. (1989). The mundanity of excellence: An ethnographic report on stratification and Olympic swimmers. Sociological Theory, 7, 70-86.Google Scholar
  3. Converse, J. M., & Schuman, H. (1974). Conversations at random: Survey research as interviewers see it. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Douglas, J. D. (1985). Creative interviewing. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-376). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Gorden, R. (1969). Interviewing: Strategy, techniques, and tactics. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  8. Gorden, R. (1992). Basic interviewing skills. Itasca, IL: Peacock.Google Scholar
  9. Hermanowicz, J. C. (1998). The stars are not enough: Scientists-their passions and professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hertz, R., & Imber, J. (Eds.) (1995). Studying elites using qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1971). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  13. McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1956). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts(Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations