Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 67–84 | Cite as

The Impact of CyberHealthcare on the Physician–Patient Relationship

  • James G. Anderson
  • Michelle R. Rainey
  • Gunther Eysenbach
Article

Abstract

It is estimated that 70 million Americans have used the Internet to acquire health-related information. Multiple factors provide the driving force behind this demand for online health information. Information technology is beginning to change the exclusive focus of medicine from curing disease to prevention of disease and enhancing health status. A critical feature of this change is the development of information and services that assist consumers to assume more responsibility for their own health and to actively participate in health care decisions. At the same time, physicians remain skeptical about the advantages of using the Internet for patient education. Some of the issues that this paper addresses include the following: What are the major factors that are leading to the increased use of the Internet by consumers to obtain health-related information? How do physicians view the use of the Internet by patients to obtain health-related information and services? How is the use of the Internet by consumers affecting physician–patient communications? What are the implications of the Internet for the future of physician–patient relationships?

information technology physician-patient relationship use of the Internet physician-patient e-mail 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    DiMaggio, P. Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., and Robinson, J. P., Social implications of the Internet. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:307–336, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cain, M. M., Mittman, R., and Sarasohn-Kahn, J., Wayne Health e-people: The Online Consumer Experience, Institute for the Future, California Health Care Foundation, Oakland, CA, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, J. G., and Goodman, K. W., Ethics and Information Technology: A Case-Based Approach to a Health Care System in Transition, Springer, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reents, S., and Miller, T. E., The health care industry in transition—The online mandate to change. Cyber Dialogue, 1998. http://www.cyberdialogue.com/free_data/white_papers/intel_health_day.htmlGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eysenbach, G., and Diepgen, T. L., Teleprevention and Teleepidemiology with the patient information system NeurodermIS on the World-Wide-Web. In Greiser, E., and Wischnewsky, M. (Hrsg.), Methoden der Medizinischen Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie in der modernen Informationsgesellschaft, MMW Medizin-Verlag, München, S.251-S.253, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eysenbach, G., Bauer, J., Sager, A., Bittorf, A., and Diepgen, T. L., An international dermatological image atlas on the WWW: Practical use for undergraduate and continuing medical education, patient education and epidemiological research. In Cesnik, B., McCray, A. T., and Scherrer, J. R. (eds.), Medinfo98, Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress on Medical Informatics, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 788–792, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eysenbach, G., and Diepgen, T. L., Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: Motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. Arch. Dermatol. 135:151–156, 1999. http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/journals/archive/derm/vol_135/no_2/dst8029.htmGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shelstad, K. R., and Clevenger, F. W., Information retrieval patterns and needs among practicing general surgeons: A statewide experience. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 84(4):490–497, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pencheon, D., NHS direct: Evaluate, integrate or bust. BMJ 317:1026–1027, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson, J. G., The business of cyberhealthcare. MD Computing 16(6):23–25, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eysenbach, G., and Diepgen, T. L., Responses to unsolicited patient e-mail requests for medical advice on the World Wide Web. JAMA 280:1333–1335, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O'Connor, A., Rostom, A., Fiset, V., Tetroe, J., Entwistle, V., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Holmes-Rovner, M., Barry, M., and Jones, J. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: Systematic review. BMJ 319:731–734, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strecher, V. J., and Bernhardt, J. M., Internet-based provider-patient interactions—The prognosis is out. In Business Briefing Global Health Care, 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 74–77, October 3–7, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bouhaddon, O., Lambert, J. G., and Miller, S., Consumer health informatics: Knowledge and evaluation studies of Medical HouseCall. Proc. AMIA Symp. 612–616, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brennan, P. F., and Strombom, I., Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: The role of computer technology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5(3):257–262, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barry, M. J., Fowler, F. J., Mulley, A. G., Henderson, J. V., and Wennberg, J. E., Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Med. Care. 33(8):772–773, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lenert, L. A., and Soetikno, R. M., Automated computer interviews to elicit utilities: Potential application in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4(1):449–456, 1997.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hafner, K., Can the Internet cure the common cold? The New York Times, July 9, 1998. http://www.corporateserver.com/qiodemo/nyt.htmGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lundberg, G. D., Providing reliable medical information to the public—Caveat lector. JAMA 262:945–946, 1989.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oreilly, M., Helping patients untangle a web of misinformation. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 162(12):1727–1728, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Key, S. W., and DeNoon, D. J., Internet opens up secret world of medicine. AIDS Weekly Plus 20–22, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coulter, A., Entwistle, V., and Gilbert, D., Sharing decisions with patients: Is the information good enough? BMJ 318:318–322, 1999.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Forrester, Why doctors hate the net. http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Interviews/0,1338,9114,FF.htmlGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sibbald, B., US physicians shunning online communication with patients. JAMC 164(8):1198, 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marshall, M. N., Shekelle, P. G., Leatherman, S., and Brook, R. H., The public release of performance data: What do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA 283(14):1866–1874, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carrns, A., AMA fights for control over doctor-price data web sites are providing. The Wall Street Journal. pp. A1,A5, August 25,2000.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keep data bank access limited. American Medical News, tApril 3, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parker, M., and Gray, J. A., What is the role of clinical ethics support in the era of e-medicine? J. Med. Ethics 27:133–135, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Electronic medicine: Possibilities and perils. Lancet 352(9134):1079, 1998.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    LaPorte, R. E., Telepreventive medicine—The autobahn to health. BMJ 313(7069), 1996.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gustafson, D. H., Robinson, T. N., Ansley, D., Adler, L., and Brennan, P. F., Consumers and Evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Am. J. Prev. Med. 16(1):23–29, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eysenbach, G., and Diepgen, T. L., Towards quality management of medical information on the Internet: Evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ 317:1496–1500, 1998. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7171/1496Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eysenbach, G., and Diepgen, T. L., Epidemiological data can be gathered with World Wide Web [Letter]. BMJ 316(7124):72, 1998. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7124/72Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eysenbach, G., Wyatt, J., Facilitating research via the Internet. In McKenzie, B., Internet and Medicine (3rd edition), Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pemberton, P. J., and Goldblatt, J., The Internet and the changing roles of doctors, patients and families. MJA 169:594–595, 1998. http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/xmas98/pemberton/pemberton.htmlGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goldsmith, J., How will the Internet change our health system? Health Aff. 19(1):148–156, 2000.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shortliffe, E. H., Networking health: Learning from others, taking the lead. Health Aff. 19(6):9–22, 2000.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tadjer, R., Better medicine: Health-care providers look to the net. http://www.informationweek.com/776/health.htm. March 6, 2000.-Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • James G. Anderson
    • 1
  • Michelle R. Rainey
    • 1
  • Gunther Eysenbach
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette
  2. 2.Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Toronto General Hospital, Department of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations