Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 47, Issue 3–4, pp 179–191 | Cite as

An Examination of Implicitly Activated, Explicitly Activated, and Nullified Stereotypes on Mathematical Performance: It's Not Just a Woman's Issue

  • Jessi L. Smith
  • Paul H. White
Article

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the different ways that stereotypes might become activated in testing situations and the effects this activation has on task performance. In Experiment 1, women undergraduates exposed to an explicitly activated stereotype (i.e., told men outperform women in mathematics) performed worse than women exposed to a nullified stereotype (i.e., told men and women perform at the same level in mathematics). The stereotype threat also was activated implicitly under “normal” conditions (i.e., just given the test with nothing else stated) such that performance in this condition was at the same (low) level as the explicitly activated threat. In Experiment 2, the results were replicated with White male undergraduates using the stereotype that “Asians are better than Whites” in mathematics. In addition, in a small field survey we found that this belief about ethnicity did occur spontaneously for White men in college calculus courses. Taken together, the results of these studies suggest that even under normal circumstances, math test situations may lead to nonoptimal performance for both stigmatized (women) and traditionally nonstigmatized (White men) group members. Implications for threat nullification techniques are discussed.

stereotype threat mathematics group processes motivation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allport, G. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: The AAUW report: Astudy of major findings on girls in education. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When White men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29-46.Google Scholar
  4. Aronson, J., Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 83-103). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474-480.Google Scholar
  7. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262-1264.Google Scholar
  8. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029-1031.Google Scholar
  9. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399-410.Google Scholar
  10. Brandon, K. (1992, October 22). Barbie's banter just adds to math minuses for girls. Chicago Tribune, p. D16.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, R. P., & Josephs, R. A. (1999). A burden of proof: Stereo-type relevance and gender differences in math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 246-257.Google Scholar
  12. Bryan, T., & Bryan, J. (1991). Positive mood and math performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 490-494.Google Scholar
  13. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3-25.Google Scholar
  14. Cacioppo, J. T., Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1981). The nature of attitudes and cognitive responses and their relationships to behavior. In R. Petty, T. Ostrom, & T. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 31-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 504-553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereo-type threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588-594.Google Scholar
  17. Eccles, J. (1984). Sex differences in achievement patterns. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Psychology and gender: Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 32, pp. 97-132). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.Google Scholar
  19. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T., & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.Google Scholar
  20. Educational Testing Service. (1996). Practicing to take the general test: Big book. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  21. Farmer, H. S. (1997). Women's motivation related to mastery, career salience, and career aspiration: A multivariate model focusing on the effects of sex role socialization. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 355-381.Google Scholar
  22. Gaertner, S., & Dovidio, J. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In S. Gaertner & J. Dovidio (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.Google Scholar
  24. Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed-effects analysis of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237-288.Google Scholar
  25. Grandy, J. (1994). Gender and ethnic differences among science and engineering majors: Experiences, achievements, and expectations (GRE board research report No 92-03R, ETS research report 94-30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  26. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. A. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.Google Scholar
  28. Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.Google Scholar
  29. Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and children's ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932-944.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, J. M. (1997). Prejudice and racism (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Kimball, M. M. (1998). Gender and math: What makes a difference? In D. L. Anselmi & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender: Perspectives and paradoxes (pp. 446-460). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 565-579.Google Scholar
  33. LeFevre, J. A., Kulak, A. G., & Heymans, S. L. (1992). Factors influencing the selection of university majors varying in mathematical content. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24, 276-289.Google Scholar
  34. Leyens, J. P., Désert, M., Croizet, J. C., & Darcis, C. (2000). Stereo-type threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization pre-conditions of stereotype threat? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189-1199.Google Scholar
  35. Maurer, K. L., Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1995). Subtyping versus subgrouping processes in stereotype representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 812-824.Google Scholar
  36. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knownsand unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.Google Scholar
  37. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59.Google Scholar
  38. Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women's generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 55-71.Google Scholar
  39. Renninger, K. A. (2000). How might the development of individual interest contribute to the conceptualization of intrinsic motivation? In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 375-407). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers' expectancies: Determinants of pupils' IQ gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115-118.Google Scholar
  41. Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79, 437-473.Google Scholar
  42. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.Google Scholar
  43. Smart, L., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). The hidden costs of hidden stigma. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 220-242). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, J. L., & White, P. H. (2001). Development of the domain identification measure: A tool for investigating stereotype threat effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 1040-1057.Google Scholar
  45. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.Google Scholar
  46. Stangor, C., Carr, C., & Kiang, L. (1998). Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1191-1197.Google Scholar
  47. Stangor, C., & Sechrist, G. B. (1998). Conceptualizing the determinants of academic choice and task performance across social groups. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 105-124). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.Google Scholar
  49. Steele, C. M. (1999, August). Thin ice: Stereotype threat and Black college students. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 44-54.Google Scholar
  50. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.Google Scholar
  51. Steen, L. A. (1987). Mathematics education: A predictor of scientific competitiveness. Science, 237, 251-253.Google Scholar
  52. Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Lee, S. Y. (1993). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children: Ten years later. Science, 259, 53-58.Google Scholar
  53. Stone, J., Lynch, C. I., Sjomeling, M., & Darley, J. M. (1999). Stereo-type threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1213-1227.Google Scholar
  54. Sue, S., & Okazaki, S. (1990). Asian American educational achievements. American Psychologist, 45, 913-920.Google Scholar
  55. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.Google Scholar
  56. Weber, R., & Cracker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961-977.Google Scholar
  57. Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34-52.Google Scholar
  58. Word, C. O., Zanna, M., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109-120.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessi L. Smith
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul H. White
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake City
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyOhio State UniversityNewark

Personalised recommendations