Hydrobiologia

, Volume 477, Issue 1–3, pp 149–153

The use of Artemia biomass sampling to predict cyst yields in culture ponds

  • P. Baert
  • Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh
  • Alex Burch
  • P. Sorgeloos
Article

Abstract

The possibility of using biomass volume (= mean biomass present in the pond.week −1) to predict the total amount of harvestable cysts (= kg wet weight collected. week −1) produced in a culture pond by an Artemia franciscana population using a mixed model regression was evaluated for two different sampling methods; horizontal transects and vertical point samples. For transects, the following equation was found: `log (0.01 + cyst yields) = –2.05 + 0.025*(biomass volume)' with F(1, 4.87) = 8.83 and p = 0.032. For the point samples, the regression was also significant with F(1, 55.2) = 13.62 and p = 0.0005 for following equation: `log (0.01 + cyst yield) = –3.613 + 0.021*(biomass volume). As pond effect and interaction terms did not significantly explain a significant portion of the variance for either of the sampling methods (Transects: pond: F(3, 14.3) = 2.48; p = 0.103; pond*biomass volume: F(3, 3.61) = 4.63; p = 0.0976; Point samples: pond: F(3, 44.5) = 0.00; p = 0.999; pond*biomass volume: F(3, 44.2) = 0.11; p = 0.954 ), the variable pond (repeated measurement factor) was not included in the final calculations for the regression equations. Although a combination of factors influences the equation, the high significance levels of the regression indicate biomass volume can be safely used to predict production trends. The low investment requirements of this method make it especially attractive for on farm use, where correctly determining the point of cyst decline will help farmers to allocate resources where needed.

Artemia sp. biomass sampling volume cyst yield 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baert, P., N. T. Anh, V. D. Quynh, N. V. Hoa & P. Sorgeloos, 1997. Increasing cyst yields in Artemia culture ponds in Vietnam, the multi-cycle system. Aquacult. Res. 28: 809–814.Google Scholar
  2. Camara, M. R. & R. De Meideros Rocha, 1987. Artemia Culture in Brazil, an overview. In Sorgeloos, P., D. A. Bengtson., W. Decleir & E. Japsers (eds), Artemia Research and its Applications, Vol. 3. Universa Press. Wetteren, Belgium: 195–200.Google Scholar
  3. Haslett, S. J. & R. G. Wear, 1985. Biomass estimation of Artemia at Lake Grassmere, Marlborough, New Zealand. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 36: 537–557.Google Scholar
  4. Lenz, P. H., 1980. Ecology of an alkali-adapted variety of Artemia from Mono Lake California, U.S.A. In Persoone, G., P. Sorgeloos, O. Roels & E. Jaspers (eds), The Brine Shrimp Artemia, Vol.3. Universa Press. Wetteren, Belgium: 79–96.Google Scholar
  5. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup & R. D. Wolfinger, 1996. SAS Systems for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  6. Marchant, R. & W. D. Williams, 1977. Population dynamics and production of brine shrimp, Parartemia zietzana Sayce (Crustacea: Anostraca), in two salt lakes in Western Victoria, Australia. Aust. J. mar. Freshwater Res. 28: 417–438.Google Scholar
  7. Ramamoorthi, K. & G. S. Thangaraj, 1980. Ecology of Artemia in the salt pans of Tuticorn, South India. In Persoone, G., P. Sorgeloos, O. Roels & E. Jaspers (eds). The Brine Shrimp Artemia, Vol. 3. Universa Press. Wetteren, Belgium: 105–114.Google Scholar
  8. Ramanathan, N. P. & P. P. Natarajan, 1987. Ecology of Artemia along the Southeastern coast in India. In Sorgeloos, P., D. A. Bengtson, W. Decleir & E. Japsers (eds), Artemia Research and its Applications, Vol. 3. Universa Press. Wetteren, Belgium: 135–139.Google Scholar
  9. Scelzo, M. A. & J. F. Voglar, 1980. Ecological study of the Artemia populations in Boca Chica salt Lake, Margarita Island Venezuela. In Persoone, G., P. Sorgeloos, O. Roels & E. Jaspers (eds), The Brine Shrimp Artemia, Vol. 3. Universa Press. Wetteren, Belgium: 115–125.Google Scholar
  10. Schindler D.W., 1969. Two useful devices for vertical plankton and water sampling. J. Fish Res. Bd Can. 26: 1948–1955.Google Scholar
  11. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman & Company, New York: 887 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Sournia, A., 1978. Phytoplankton Manual. Unesco, Paris: 337 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Southwood, T. R. E., 1995. Ecological Methods (with particular reference to the study of insect populations). Chapman & Hall, London: 524 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Stephens, D. W., 1990. Changes in lake levels, salinity and the biological community of Great Salt lake, (Utah, U.S.A.), 1847-1987. Hydrobiologia 197: 139–146.Google Scholar
  15. Wear, G. R. & S. J. Haslett, 1987. Studies on the biology and ecology of Artemia from Lake Grassmere, New Zealand. In Sorgeloos, P., D. A. Bengtson, W. Decleir & E. Japsers (eds), Artemia Research and its Applications, Vol. 3. Universa Press. Wetteren, Belgium: 101–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Baert
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh
    • 3
  • Alex Burch
    • 4
  • P. Sorgeloos
    • 2
  1. 1.Provinciaal Natuurcentrum, Het Groene HuisGenkBelgium
  2. 2.Laboratory of Aquaculture & Artemia Reference CenterGhent UniversityBelgium
  3. 3.Aquaculture and Fisheries Sciences Institute (AFSI)Can Tho UniversityCan ThoVietnam
  4. 4.School of Ocean SciencesUniversity of Wales – BangorAngleseyU.K

Personalised recommendations